Comparative analysis of protein thermostability: Differences in amino acid content and substitution at the surfaces and in the core regions of thermophilic and mesophilic proteins
Source abstract
Abstract
In order to investigate the factors responsible for protein thermostability, we performed a comparative analysis. For this study, we prepared a new dataset composed of 47 homologous pairs of thermophilic and mesophilic proteins. It is he largest comparative study dataset ever presented. The frequency and substitution preference of each amino acid type in the dataset were analyzed.Twokinds of residual structural states were considered, i.e. surface (solvent-exposed) and core (buried) regions. On the surface of thermophilic proteins, higher frequencies were observed for Arg, Glu, and Tyr. Analysis of substitution preference also suggests that these often appear by replacement of other amino acid types. The results indicate that Arg, Glu, and Tyr are suitable for location on the surface of thermophilic proteins. On the other hand, at the core of thermophilic proteins, Ala is often appeared. In addition, our t-test analysis provides the first quantitative information about trends in the frequencies and substitution preferences for Cys, Gln, Met, and Ser. The results indicate that Gln and Met on the surface and Cys and Ser in the core are disadvantageous for protein thermostability.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Protein Structure and Dynamics · Enzyme Structure and Function · Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1073/pnas.96.7.357810.1073/pnas.96.7.3578 ↗
2. 10.1074/jbc.C00049720010.1074/jbc.C000497200 ↗
3. 10.1007/PL0000093510.1007/PL00000935 ↗
4. 10.1006/jmbi.1998.215910.1006/jmbi.1998.2159 ↗
5. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(20000301)38:4<368::AID-PROT3>3.0.CO;2-R10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(20000301)38:4<368::AID-PROT3>3.0.CO;2-R ↗
6. 10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00251-910.1016/S0969-2126(01)00251-9 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00267-210.1016/S0969-2126(01)00267-2 ↗
8. 10.1006/jmbi.1999.281010.1006/jmbi.1999.2810 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0167-7799(98)01193-710.1016/S0167-7799(98)01193-7 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00133-710.1016/S0969-2126(00)00133-7 ↗
11. 10.1128/MMBR.65.1.1-43.200110.1128/MMBR.65.1.1-43.2001 ↗
12. 10.1021/bi970532110.1021/bi9705321 ↗
13. G. Vogt · Struct. Fold. Des. · 1997 · 2 · S4010.1016/S1359-0278(97)00062-X ↗
14. 10.1006/jmbi.1997.104210.1006/jmbi.1997.1042 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0301-4622(01)00154-510.1016/S0301-4622(01)00154-5 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0301-4622(99)00103-910.1016/S0301-4622(99)00103-9 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2004.01.01810.1016/j.jbiotec.2004.01.018 ↗
18. 10.1093/nar/28.1.23510.1093/nar/28.1.235 ↗
19. 10.1093/nar/gkh03910.1093/nar/gkh039 ↗
20. 10.1093/nar/25.17.338910.1093/nar/25.17.3389 ↗
21. E. Myers · Comput. Appl. Biosci. · 1988 · 4 · 11
22. 10.1016/0022-2836(72)90513-X10.1016/0022-2836(72)90513-X ↗
23. 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)73929-510.1016/S0006-3495(02)73929-5 ↗
24. 10.1021/bp034045q10.1021/bp034045q ↗
25. 10.1093/protein/13.3.17910.1093/protein/13.3.179 ↗
26. 10.1073/pnas.96.17.945910.1073/pnas.96.17.9459 ↗
27. 10.1006/jmbi.1994.102210.1006/jmbi.1994.1022 ↗
28. 10.1093/protein/13.11.75310.1093/protein/13.11.753 ↗
29. 10.1081/PB-12001545910.1081/PB-120015459 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0378-1119(02)00871-510.1016/S0378-1119(02)00871-5 ↗
31. 10.1006/jmbi.2001.471810.1006/jmbi.2001.4718 ↗