journal article·2020-01-31Open access

A comparative study of the influence of the deposition technique (electrodeposition versus sputtering) on the properties of nanostructured Fe70Pd30 films

Matteo Cialone, Monica Fernandez-Barcia, Federica Celegato, Marco Coisson, Gabriele Barrera, Margitta Uhlemann, Annett Gebert, Jordi Sort, Eva Pellicer, Paola Rizzi, Paola Tiberto

Abstract

Sputtering and electrodeposition are among the most widespread techniques for metallic thin film deposition. Since these techniques operate under different principles, the resulting films typically show different microstructures even when the chemical composition is kept fixed. In this work, films of Fe70Pd30 were produced in a thickness range between 30 and 600 nm, using both electrodeposition and sputtering. The electrodeposited films were deposited under potentiostatic regime from an ammonia sulfosalicylic acid-based aqueous solution. Meanwhile, the sputtered films were deposited from a composite target in radio frequency regime. Both approaches were proven to yield high quality and homogenous films. However, their crystallographic structure was different. Although all films were polycrystalline and Fe and Pd formed a solid solution with a body-centered cubic structure, a palladium hydride phase was additionally detected in the electrodeposited films. The occurrence of this phase induced internal stress in the films, thereby influencing their magnetic properties. In particular, the thickest electrodeposited Fe70Pd30 films showed out-of-plane magnetic anisotropy, whereas the magnetization easy axis lied in the film plane for all the sputtered films. The domain pattern of the electrodeposited films was investigated by magnetic force microscopy. Finally, nanoindentation studies highlighted the high quality of both the sputtered and electrodeposited films, the former exhibiting higher reduced Young’s modulus and Berkovich hardness values.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrodeposition and Electroless Coatings · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Copper Interconnects and Reliability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Chemistry Department and NIS, University of Torino, Torino, Italy

Metrology of Innovative Materials and Life Science, INRiM, Torino, Italy

Institute for Complex Materials, IFW Dresden, Dresden, Germany

Department of Physics, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cerdanyola Del Vallès, Spain

Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies, Barcelona, Spain

Funding

Generalitat de Catalunya · H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions · Spanish Government

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.rinp.2018.02.02410.1016/j.rinp.2018.02.024 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.287.5460.198910.1126/science.287.5460.1989 ↗
3. 10.1109/20.82441810.1109/20.824418 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0304-8853(99)00649-610.1016/S0304-8853(99)00649-6 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.03.02210.1016/j.actamat.2007.03.022 ↗
6. Morley SA · Sci Rep · 2018 · 4
7. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.11.05410.1016/j.actamat.2014.11.054 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.actamat.2003.08.02410.1016/j.actamat.2003.08.024 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.11763710.1063/1.117637 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.145807510.1063/1.1458075 ↗
11. 10.1002/adem.20120005210.1002/adem.201200052 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0022-0248(98)00036-010.1016/S0022-0248(98)00036-0 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.11.19310.1016/j.jallcom.2013.11.193 ↗
14. 10.1002/adem.20120004110.1002/adem.201200041 ↗
15. 10.1088/1367-2630/10/6/06300710.1088/1367-2630/10/6/063007 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2016.02.06210.1016/j.matchemphys.2016.02.062 ↗
17. 10.1088/0268-1242/23/12/12500310.1088/0268-1242/23/12/125003 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.tsf.2017.09.00210.1016/j.tsf.2017.09.002 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.07.02210.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.07.022 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.09.02210.1016/j.electacta.2010.09.022 ↗
21. 10.33961/JECST.2018.9.3.20210.33961/JECST.2018.9.3.202 ↗
22. 10.2320/matertrans.44.29810.2320/matertrans.44.298 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.03.04610.1016/j.electacta.2011.03.046 ↗
24. 10.1007/978-1-4757-5943-310.1007/978-1-4757-5943-3 ↗
25. 10.1557/S088376940004163410.1557/S0883769400041634 ↗
26. von Goldbeck O · 198210.1007/978-3-662-08024-5 ↗
27. 10.1038/s41598-017-16963-510.1038/s41598-017-16963-5 ↗
28. 10.1007/b10119010.1007/b101190 ↗
29. 10.1146/annurev.ms.21.080191.00141310.1146/annurev.ms.21.080191.001413 ↗
30. DPBroom · 2011
31. 10.1080/00202967.2000.1187129710.1080/00202967.2000.11871297 ↗
32. 10.1364/AO.41.00305310.1364/AO.41.003053 ↗
33. 10.1116/1.56868210.1116/1.568682 ↗
34. 10.1109/20.10438910.1109/20.104389 ↗
35. Cullity B · 2009
36. 10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00231-610.1016/S1359-6454(98)00231-6 ↗
37. Skomski R · J Phys · 2003 · 15 · R841
38. 10.1143/JJAP.31.134710.1143/JJAP.31.1347 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.32488110.1063/1.324881 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.physb.2003.08.10110.1016/j.physb.2003.08.101 ↗
41. 10.1109/TMAG.2009.203251910.1109/TMAG.2009.2032519 ↗
42. 10.1063/1.145227910.1063/1.1452279 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2008.11.00710.1016/j.vacuum.2008.11.007 ↗
44. 10.1016/S0043-1648(00)00488-910.1016/S0043-1648(00)00488-9 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.02.07710.1016/j.electacta.2013.02.077 ↗