A comparative study of the influence of the deposition technique (electrodeposition versus sputtering) on the properties of nanostructured Fe70Pd30 films
Source abstract
Abstract
Sputtering and electrodeposition are among the most widespread techniques for metallic thin film deposition. Since these techniques operate under different principles, the resulting films typically show different microstructures even when the chemical composition is kept fixed. In this work, films of Fe70Pd30 were produced in a thickness range between 30 and 600 nm, using both electrodeposition and sputtering. The electrodeposited films were deposited under potentiostatic regime from an ammonia sulfosalicylic acid-based aqueous solution. Meanwhile, the sputtered films were deposited from a composite target in radio frequency regime. Both approaches were proven to yield high quality and homogenous films. However, their crystallographic structure was different. Although all films were polycrystalline and Fe and Pd formed a solid solution with a body-centered cubic structure, a palladium hydride phase was additionally detected in the electrodeposited films. The occurrence of this phase induced internal stress in the films, thereby influencing their magnetic properties. In particular, the thickest electrodeposited Fe70Pd30 films showed out-of-plane magnetic anisotropy, whereas the magnetization easy axis lied in the film plane for all the sputtered films. The domain pattern of the electrodeposited films was investigated by magnetic force microscopy. Finally, nanoindentation studies highlighted the high quality of both the sputtered and electrodeposited films, the former exhibiting higher reduced Young’s modulus and Berkovich hardness values.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrodeposition and Electroless Coatings · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Copper Interconnects and Reliability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Chemistry Department and NIS, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
Metrology of Innovative Materials and Life Science, INRiM, Torino, Italy
Institute for Complex Materials, IFW Dresden, Dresden, Germany
Department of Physics, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cerdanyola Del Vallès, Spain
Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies, Barcelona, Spain
Funding
Generalitat de Catalunya · H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions · Spanish Government
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.rinp.2018.02.02410.1016/j.rinp.2018.02.024 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.287.5460.198910.1126/science.287.5460.1989 ↗
3. 10.1109/20.82441810.1109/20.824418 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0304-8853(99)00649-610.1016/S0304-8853(99)00649-6 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.03.02210.1016/j.actamat.2007.03.022 ↗
6. Morley SA · Sci Rep · 2018 · 4
7. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.11.05410.1016/j.actamat.2014.11.054 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.actamat.2003.08.02410.1016/j.actamat.2003.08.024 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.11763710.1063/1.117637 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.145807510.1063/1.1458075 ↗
11. 10.1002/adem.20120005210.1002/adem.201200052 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0022-0248(98)00036-010.1016/S0022-0248(98)00036-0 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.11.19310.1016/j.jallcom.2013.11.193 ↗
14. 10.1002/adem.20120004110.1002/adem.201200041 ↗
15. 10.1088/1367-2630/10/6/06300710.1088/1367-2630/10/6/063007 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2016.02.06210.1016/j.matchemphys.2016.02.062 ↗
17. 10.1088/0268-1242/23/12/12500310.1088/0268-1242/23/12/125003 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.tsf.2017.09.00210.1016/j.tsf.2017.09.002 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.07.02210.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.07.022 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.09.02210.1016/j.electacta.2010.09.022 ↗
21. 10.33961/JECST.2018.9.3.20210.33961/JECST.2018.9.3.202 ↗
22. 10.2320/matertrans.44.29810.2320/matertrans.44.298 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.03.04610.1016/j.electacta.2011.03.046 ↗
24. 10.1007/978-1-4757-5943-310.1007/978-1-4757-5943-3 ↗
25. 10.1557/S088376940004163410.1557/S0883769400041634 ↗
26. von Goldbeck O · 198210.1007/978-3-662-08024-5 ↗
27. 10.1038/s41598-017-16963-510.1038/s41598-017-16963-5 ↗
28. 10.1007/b10119010.1007/b101190 ↗
29. 10.1146/annurev.ms.21.080191.00141310.1146/annurev.ms.21.080191.001413 ↗
30. DPBroom · 2011
31. 10.1080/00202967.2000.1187129710.1080/00202967.2000.11871297 ↗
32. 10.1364/AO.41.00305310.1364/AO.41.003053 ↗
33. 10.1116/1.56868210.1116/1.568682 ↗
34. 10.1109/20.10438910.1109/20.104389 ↗
35. Cullity B · 2009
36. 10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00231-610.1016/S1359-6454(98)00231-6 ↗
37. Skomski R · J Phys · 2003 · 15 · R841
38. 10.1143/JJAP.31.134710.1143/JJAP.31.1347 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.32488110.1063/1.324881 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.physb.2003.08.10110.1016/j.physb.2003.08.101 ↗
41. 10.1109/TMAG.2009.203251910.1109/TMAG.2009.2032519 ↗
42. 10.1063/1.145227910.1063/1.1452279 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2008.11.00710.1016/j.vacuum.2008.11.007 ↗
44. 10.1016/S0043-1648(00)00488-910.1016/S0043-1648(00)00488-9 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.02.07710.1016/j.electacta.2013.02.077 ↗