Electrochemical Oxidation of CO on Cu Single Crystals under Alkaline Conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
We perform a joint experimental–theoretical study of the electrochemical oxidation of CO on copper (Cu) under alkaline conditions. Using cyclic voltammetry on Cu single-crystal surfaces, we demonstrate that both Cu terraces and steps show CO oxidation activity at potentials just slightly positive (0.03–0.14 V) of the thermodynamic equilibrium potential. The overpotentials are 0.23–0.12 V lower than that of gold (≈0.26 V), which until now has been considered to be the most active catalyst for this process. Our theoretical calculations suggest that Cu’s activity arises from the advantageous combination of simultaneous *CO and *OH adsorption under CO oxidation potentials and surmountable *CO–*OH coupling barriers. Experimentally observed onset potentials are in agreement with the computed onsets of *OH adsorption. We furthermore show that the onsets of *OH adsorption on steps are more affected by *CO–*OH interactions than on terraces due to a stronger competitive adsorption. Overall, Cu(100) shows the lowest overpotential (0.03 V) of the facets considered.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Fysikvej 311, 2750 Ballerup, Denmark
Center for Bachelor of Engineering Studies, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Lautrupvang 15, 2750 Ballerup, Denmark
Funding
H2020 Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions · Villum Fonden
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0022-0728(85)80083-810.1016/0022-0728(85)80083-8 ↗
2. 10.1021/j100167a03710.1021/j100167a037 ↗
3. 10.1021/jp952560410.1021/jp9525604 ↗
4. 10.1021/jp036483l10.1021/jp036483l ↗
5. 10.1021/la101404810.1021/la1014048 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.pecs.2020.10084210.1016/j.pecs.2020.100842 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41467-018-05544-310.1038/s41467-018-05544-3 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b0372810.1021/acs.jpclett.9b03728 ↗
9. Nørskov J. K. · 201410.1002/9781118892114 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.514491210.1063/1.5144912 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b0364410.1021/acs.langmuir.8b03644 ↗
12. 10.1039/b803956a10.1039/b803956a ↗
13. 10.1021/acscatal.8b0281310.1021/acscatal.8b02813 ↗
14. 10.1039/C8SC02495B10.1039/C8SC02495B ↗
15. 10.1016/S0022-0728(02)00669-110.1016/S0022-0728(02)00669-1 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0106410.1021/acsenergylett.9b01064 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.23514910.1103/PhysRevB.85.235149 ↗
18. 10.1088/0953-8984/21/39/39550210.1088/0953-8984/21/39/395502 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.367640710.1063/1.3676407 ↗
20. Andreussi, O. ENVIRON package. http://www.quantum-environment.org.
21. 10.1021/jp047349j10.1021/jp047349j ↗
22. 10.1039/C5CY01332A10.1039/C5CY01332A ↗
23. 10.1063/1.132967210.1063/1.1329672 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.132322410.1063/1.1323224 ↗
25. 10.1088/1361-648X/aa680e10.1088/1361-648X/aa680e ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.15600110.1103/PhysRevLett.122.156001 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.498678710.1063/1.4986787 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.10410310.1103/PhysRevB.100.104103 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.jpca.9b0031110.1021/acs.jpca.9b00311 ↗
30. 10.1038/s41929-020-00505-w10.1038/s41929-020-00505-w ↗