Capacitive deionisation for water desalination review: experimental and simulation
Source abstract
Abstract
Capacitive Deionization (CDI) has emerged as an energy-efficient and environmentally friendly technology for water desalination. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of CDI, covering both experimental and simulation approaches. It introduces the background, definition, and diverse applications of CDI, from water desalination to environmental monitoring and resource recovery. The review highlights CDI's advantages, such as low energy consumption and operational simplicity, as well as its limitations, particularly its design-specific operating window favoring low-to-moderate salinity waters and sensitivity to organic-rich conditions. Strategies such as hybrid CDI systems and electrode surface functionalization are discussed to mitigate these challenges. Key working principles and advancements, including innovations in electrode materials, synthesis methods, and reactor design, are examined to improve ion removal efficiency, selectivity, energy use, and system durability. Material modification strategies are presented in the context of structure - performance relationships, emphasizing rational design principles. The review also explores simulation methods, including reactor modeling, computational fluid dynamics, molecular dynamics, and numerical approaches, and machine learning highlighting their synergy with experiments in optimizing CDI performance and guiding scale-up. Coupling CDI with other systems and its applications in water purification, particularly for ion and organic compound removal are also discussed. Finally, challenges in both experimental and simulation efforts, such as material cost, model complexity, computational demands, and scalability, are discussed. While CDI shows promise for sustainable water desalination and resource recovery, further research on hybrid configurations, predictive modeling, and pilot-scale validation is needed to address its limitations and enable large-scale adoption.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques · Membrane Separation Technologies · Fuel Cells and Related Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Hamburg University of Technology
Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), German Research Foundation, e-Biotech · Funding Programme Open Access Publishing of Hamburg University of Technology
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/978-1-59745-278-6_1210.1007/978-1-59745-278-6_12 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.02.02410.1016/j.jelechem.2018.02.024 ↗
3. 10.1039/C5EE00519A10.1039/C5EE00519A ↗
4. Faraday M. IV. Experimental researches in electricity.—third series Philos. Trans R Soc Lond. 1997;123:23–54.
5. Farmer JC, Fix, D. V. Richardson JH, May, S. C, & Thomson, S. L. Desalination with carbon aerogel electrodes. Livermore (CA) (United States): Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL); 1996.
6. 10.1016/j.desal.2014.02.03110.1016/j.desal.2014.02.031 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.desal.2020.11439010.1016/j.desal.2020.114390 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.watres.2021.11722210.1016/j.watres.2021.117222 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.10481610.1016/j.jwpe.2024.104816 ↗
10. 10.1186/s11671-016-1284-110.1186/s11671-016-1284-1 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.03.00510.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.03.005 ↗
12. 10.1002/smll.20240121410.1002/smll.202401214 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.desal.2024.11785010.1016/j.desal.2024.117850 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.desal.2007.08.00510.1016/j.desal.2007.08.005 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.desal.2023.11727810.1016/j.desal.2023.117278 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.15369910.1016/j.cej.2024.153699 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.desal.2024.11778710.1016/j.desal.2024.117787 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.desal.2023.11689910.1016/j.desal.2023.116899 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.13907110.1016/j.cej.2022.139071 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.13701110.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137011 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.10714610.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107146 ↗
22. 10.3390/polym1421477610.3390/polym14214776 ↗
23. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c0084810.1021/acssuschemeng.1c00848 ↗
24. 10.1039/D0EE03145C10.1039/D0EE03145C ↗
25. 10.1016/j.desal.2018.10.01310.1016/j.desal.2018.10.013 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12449310.1016/j.cej.2020.124493 ↗
27. 10.1080/08927022.2019.163752010.1080/08927022.2019.1637520 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.04.15610.1016/j.cej.2019.04.156 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.cej.2018.11.23610.1016/j.cej.2018.11.236 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.desal.2017.10.01210.1016/j.desal.2017.10.012 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.07.04310.1016/j.memsci.2017.07.043 ↗
32. 10.3390/ma1007084710.3390/ma10070847 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.watres.2016.02.00410.1016/j.watres.2016.02.004 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.desal.2015.03.02910.1016/j.desal.2015.03.029 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.desal.2014.03.02810.1016/j.desal.2014.03.028 ↗
36. 10.1039/C4EE02378A10.1039/C4EE02378A ↗
37. 10.1002/ceat.20130068110.1002/ceat.201300681 ↗
38. 10.18174/26477710.18174/264777 ↗
39. 10.1080/19443994.2012.71507610.1080/19443994.2012.715076 ↗
40. 10.1039/c3ee24443a10.1039/c3ee24443a ↗
41. 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.01.06310.1016/j.electacta.2013.01.063 ↗
42. 10.1126/science.adn624210.1126/science.adn6242 ↗
43. 10.1016/b978-0-12-813306-4.00013-610.1016/b978-0-12-813306-4.00013-6 ↗
44. Tomsjansen CJE. Characterisation of electrochemical properties of capacitive membrane electrodes. Determination of the relation between the electrochemical parameters and the performance of capacitive membrane electrodes with electrochemical impedance spectroscopy [master’s thesis]. Delft: Delft University of Technology; 2023. https://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:ec01d189-008e-45cc-a64c-fb58b6bbdc27
45. Vos GHR. Ion selectivity in multi-channel CDI: permselectivity of porous carbon capacitive membrane electrodes used in multi-channel capacitive deionisation [master’s thesis]. Delft: Delft University of Technology; 2024. https://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:725d016b-77e3-4423-8e57-fbd50f4858b2
46. 10.1016/j.jece.2023.11136810.1016/j.jece.2023.111368 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.desal.2023.11723610.1016/j.desal.2023.117236 ↗
48. 10.1038/s41467-024-52219-310.1038/s41467-024-52219-3 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.12.04610.1016/j.matpr.2023.12.046 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.watres.2021.11731810.1016/j.watres.2021.117318 ↗
51. 10.3390/membranes1408017510.3390/membranes14080175 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.08710.1016/j.rser.2015.12.087 ↗
53. 10.3390/membranes1102012610.3390/membranes11020126 ↗
54. 10.1038/s41545-024-00331-810.1038/s41545-024-00331-8 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.05.08510.1016/j.seppur.2019.05.085 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12812910.1016/j.cej.2020.128129 ↗
57. 10.1021/acs.est.8b0485810.1021/acs.est.8b04858 ↗
58. 10.1021/acs.estlett.2c0055110.1021/acs.estlett.2c00551 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.desal.2014.03.04310.1016/j.desal.2014.03.043 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.13640510.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136405 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.desal.2019.04.00310.1016/j.desal.2019.04.003 ↗
62. 10.1021/acs.est.4c0067210.1021/acs.est.4c00672 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.09.04310.1016/j.memsci.2009.09.043 ↗
64. 10.3390/ijerph19171059910.3390/ijerph191710599 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.desal.2020.11438310.1016/j.desal.2020.114383 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.desal.2013.06.00910.1016/j.desal.2013.06.009 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.desal.2023.11714610.1016/j.desal.2023.117146 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.11.06210.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.11.062 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.watres.2017.10.02410.1016/j.watres.2017.10.024 ↗
70. 10.1002/9781119429418.ch810.1002/9781119429418.ch8 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2018.06.05210.1016/j.vacuum.2018.06.052 ↗
72. 10.1021/acsnano.1c0593110.1021/acsnano.1c05931 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.01.02910.1016/j.polymer.2006.01.029 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.seppur.2009.10.02310.1016/j.seppur.2009.10.023 ↗
75. 10.1016/S0008-6223(03)00013-710.1016/S0008-6223(03)00013-7 ↗
76. 10.1021/es201551e10.1021/es201551e ↗
77. 10.1007/s13369-016-2301-510.1007/s13369-016-2301-5 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.11470310.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114703 ↗
79. 10.3390/s2023683310.3390/s20236833 ↗
80. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.15942210.1016/j.jallcom.2021.159422 ↗
81. 10.1021/ba-1960-0027.ch02010.1021/ba-1960-0027.ch020 ↗
82. 10.1016/j.watres.2013.01.02510.1016/j.watres.2013.01.025 ↗
83. 10.1039/C4RA14447C10.1039/C4RA14447C ↗
84. 10.1021/acs.est.9b0066210.1021/acs.est.9b00662 ↗
85. 10.1080/09593330.2024.231866910.1080/09593330.2024.2318669 ↗
86. 10.1039/C9RA04426D10.1039/C9RA04426D ↗
87. 10.1016/j.gee.2025.02.00710.1016/j.gee.2025.02.007 ↗
88. 10.1002/adfm.20240633310.1002/adfm.202406333 ↗
89. 10.2139/ssrn.492128410.2139/ssrn.4921284 ↗
90. 10.3390/app1001040310.3390/app10010403 ↗
91. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0145210.1021/acsenergylett.3c01452 ↗
92. 10.1002/cssc.20190207110.1002/cssc.201902071 ↗
93. 10.1021/acsami.3c0204410.1021/acsami.3c02044 ↗
94. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0478510.1021/acsnano.8b04785 ↗
95. 10.1016/j.watres.2018.11.06410.1016/j.watres.2018.11.064 ↗
96. Liu M, Waugh J, Babu SK, et al. Numerical modeling of ion transport and adsorption in porous. Media: A Two-scale Study for Capacitive Deionization Desalination; 2022.
97. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b0916810.1021/acs.jpcb.7b09168 ↗
98. 10.1016/j.desal.2020.11484210.1016/j.desal.2020.114842 ↗
99. 10.3390/membranes1207071710.3390/membranes12070717 ↗
100. 10.3390/w1409137910.3390/w14091379 ↗