journal article·2023-12-31Open access

Accelerated discovery of high-performance Al-Si-Mg-Sc casting alloys by integrating active learning with high-throughput CALPHAD calculations

Jianbao Gao, Jing Zhong, Guangchen Liu, Shaoji Zhang, Jiali Zhang, Zuming Liu, Bo Song, Lijun Zhang

Abstract

Scandium is the best alloying element to improve the mechanical properties of industrial Al-Si-Mg casting alloys. Most literature reports devote to exploring/designing optimal Sc additions in different commercial Al-Si-Mg casting alloys with well-defined compositions. However, no attempt to optimize the contents of Si, Mg, and Sc has been made due to the great challenge of simultaneous screening in high-dimensional composition space with limited experimental data. In this paper, a novel alloy design strategy was proposed and successfully applied to accelerate the discovery of hypoeutectic Al-Si-Mg-Sc casting alloys over high-dimensional composition space. Firstly, high-throughput CALculation of PHAse Diagrams (CALPHAD) solidification simulations of ocean of hypoeutectic Al-Si-Mg-Sc casting alloys over a wide composition range were performed to establish the quantitative relation 'composition-process-microstructure'. Secondly, the relation 'microstructure-mechanical properties' of Al-Si-Mg-Sc hypoeutectic casting alloys was acquired using the active learning technique supported by key experiments designed by CALPHAD and Bayesian optimization samplings. After a benchmark in A356-xSc alloys, such a strategy was utilized to design the high-performance hypoeutectic Al-xSi-yMg alloys with optimal Sc additions that were later experimentally validated. Finally, the present strategy was successfully extended to screen the optimal contents of Si, Mg, and Sc over high-dimensional hypoeutectic Al-xSi-yMg-zSc composition space. It is anticipated that the proposed strategy integrating active learning with high-throughput CALPHAD simulations and key experiments should be generally applicable to the efficient design of high-performance multi-component materials over high-dimensional composition space.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Central South University

Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Funding

the Science and Technology Program of Guangxi province, China · the National Natural Science Foundation of China · the Youth Talent Project of Innovation-driven Plan at Central South University · the Central Universities of Central South University

References (72)

Show source-provided references
1. Davis JR. Aluminum and aluminum alloys. OH: ASM International; 1993.
2. 10.1016/j.matpr.2016.03.04210.1016/j.matpr.2016.03.042 ↗
3. 10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00259-810.1016/S1359-6454(02)00259-8 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.10.01610.1016/j.jallcom.2008.10.016 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.07.16910.1016/j.jallcom.2009.07.169 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.07.01810.1016/j.jallcom.2012.07.018 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.05.13910.1016/j.jallcom.2013.05.139 ↗
8. 10.1007/s11661-014-2395-x10.1007/s11661-014-2395-x ↗
9. 10.1007/s12598-017-0970-110.1007/s12598-017-0970-1 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.09.13210.1016/j.jallcom.2016.09.132 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.12.03410.1016/j.matdes.2016.12.034 ↗
12. 10.1080/13640461.2018.143621410.1080/13640461.2018.1436214 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.10.12510.1016/j.jallcom.2017.10.125 ↗
14. 10.1007/s12666-018-1293-010.1007/s12666-018-1293-0 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.07.06910.1016/j.jallcom.2019.07.069 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.10122710.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101227 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.07.18310.1016/j.jallcom.2009.07.183 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.04.05910.1016/j.jallcom.2011.04.059 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.09.05410.1016/j.jallcom.2017.09.054 ↗
20. 10.1016/S1471-5317(02)00004-410.1016/S1471-5317(02)00004-4 ↗
21. 10.1080/09506608.2015.113769210.1080/09506608.2015.1137692 ↗
22. 10.1007/BF0302741210.1007/BF03027412 ↗
23. 10.1007/BF0302755910.1007/BF03027559 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.11.05110.1016/j.commatsci.2012.11.051 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.16765010.1016/j.jallcom.2022.167650 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.11711710.1016/j.actamat.2021.117117 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jmst.2020.03.05610.1016/j.jmst.2020.03.056 ↗
28. 10.1007/s10853-015-9487-x10.1007/s10853-015-9487-x ↗
29. 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.10.00610.1016/j.matlet.2014.10.006 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.03.00510.1016/j.msea.2014.03.005 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.msea.2016.08.02210.1016/j.msea.2016.08.022 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.matchar.2015.10.03010.1016/j.matchar.2015.10.030 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.16547710.1016/j.jallcom.2022.165477 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jmst.2020.08.00810.1016/j.jmst.2020.08.008 ↗
35. 10.1002/adfm.20210936710.1002/adfm.202109367 ↗
36. 10.1038/s41524-021-00500-010.1038/s41524-021-00500-0 ↗
37. 10.1007/s11661-015-2911-710.1007/s11661-015-2911-7 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.16382810.1016/j.jallcom.2022.163828 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.11743110.1016/j.actamat.2021.117431 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jmst.2021.09.06110.1016/j.jmst.2021.09.061 ↗
41. Yi W, Liu GC, Gao JB, et al. Boosting for concept design of casting aluminum alloys driven by combining computational thermodynamics and machine learning techniques. J Mater Inf. 2021;1(2):11.
42. 10.3390/ma1601030610.3390/ma16010306 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.apmate.2021.09.00510.1016/j.apmate.2021.09.005 ↗
44. 10.1038/s41524-020-0334-510.1038/s41524-020-0334-5 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15615910.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156159 ↗
46. 10.3389/fmats.2022.92429410.3389/fmats.2022.924294 ↗
47. 10.1038/s41524-019-0153-810.1038/s41524-019-0153-8 ↗
48. 10.1038/s41467-021-24523-910.1038/s41467-021-24523-9 ↗
49. 10.1016/S0364-5916(02)00037-810.1016/S0364-5916(02)00037-8 ↗
50. 10.1007/s12613-022-2458-810.1007/s12613-022-2458-8 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.16598410.1016/j.jallcom.2022.165984 ↗
52. 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.0c0010410.1021/acsmaterialslett.0c00104 ↗
53. 10.1007/s11661-020-06132-110.1007/s11661-020-06132-1 ↗
54. 10.1126/science.abo494010.1126/science.abo4940 ↗
55. Amornsamankul S, Pimpunchat B, Triampo W, et al. A comparison of machine learning algorithms and their applications. Int J Simul Syst Sci Technol. 2019;20:8.
56. Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J Mach Learn Res. 2011;12:2825–2830.
57. Paszke A, Gross S, Massa F, et al., editors. Pytorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Vol. 32. Vancouver (BC): Curran Associates, Inc; 2019.
58. 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.03.01010.1016/j.actamat.2019.03.010 ↗
59. Xie J, Su Y, Xue D, et al. Machine learning for materials research and development. Acta Metall Sin. 2021;57(11):1343–1361.
60. 10.1038/s41598-018-21936-310.1038/s41598-018-21936-3 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.10.01410.1016/j.matdes.2018.10.014 ↗
62. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.296622810.1109/ACCESS.2020.2966228 ↗
63. Brochu E Cora VM De Freitas N. A tutorial on Bayesian optimization of expensive cost functions with application to active user modeling and hierarchical reinforcement learning. 2010.
64. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.10101810.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.101018 ↗
65. 10.1038/ncomms1124110.1038/ncomms11241 ↗
66. 10.1038/srep1966010.1038/srep19660 ↗
67. 10.31399/asm.tb.aacppa.978162708335510.31399/asm.tb.aacppa.9781627083355 ↗
68. 10.1038/s41524-021-00658-710.1038/s41524-021-00658-7 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10977710.1016/j.matdes.2021.109777 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.16446810.1016/j.jallcom.2022.164468 ↗
71. 10.1038/s43246-020-00074-210.1038/s43246-020-00074-2 ↗
72. Drouzy M, Jacob S, Richard M. Interpretation of tensile results by means of quality index and probable yield strength. AFS Int Cast Metals J. 1980;5:43–50.