Accelerated discovery of high-performance Al-Si-Mg-Sc casting alloys by integrating active learning with high-throughput CALPHAD calculations
Source abstract
Abstract
Scandium is the best alloying element to improve the mechanical properties of industrial Al-Si-Mg casting alloys. Most literature reports devote to exploring/designing optimal Sc additions in different commercial Al-Si-Mg casting alloys with well-defined compositions. However, no attempt to optimize the contents of Si, Mg, and Sc has been made due to the great challenge of simultaneous screening in high-dimensional composition space with limited experimental data. In this paper, a novel alloy design strategy was proposed and successfully applied to accelerate the discovery of hypoeutectic Al-Si-Mg-Sc casting alloys over high-dimensional composition space. Firstly, high-throughput CALculation of PHAse Diagrams (CALPHAD) solidification simulations of ocean of hypoeutectic Al-Si-Mg-Sc casting alloys over a wide composition range were performed to establish the quantitative relation 'composition-process-microstructure'. Secondly, the relation 'microstructure-mechanical properties' of Al-Si-Mg-Sc hypoeutectic casting alloys was acquired using the active learning technique supported by key experiments designed by CALPHAD and Bayesian optimization samplings. After a benchmark in A356-xSc alloys, such a strategy was utilized to design the high-performance hypoeutectic Al-xSi-yMg alloys with optimal Sc additions that were later experimentally validated. Finally, the present strategy was successfully extended to screen the optimal contents of Si, Mg, and Sc over high-dimensional hypoeutectic Al-xSi-yMg-zSc composition space. It is anticipated that the proposed strategy integrating active learning with high-throughput CALPHAD simulations and key experiments should be generally applicable to the efficient design of high-performance multi-component materials over high-dimensional composition space.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Central South University
Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Funding
the Science and Technology Program of Guangxi province, China · the National Natural Science Foundation of China · the Youth Talent Project of Innovation-driven Plan at Central South University · the Central Universities of Central South University
References (72)
Show source-provided references
1. Davis JR. Aluminum and aluminum alloys. OH: ASM International; 1993.
2. 10.1016/j.matpr.2016.03.04210.1016/j.matpr.2016.03.042 ↗
3. 10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00259-810.1016/S1359-6454(02)00259-8 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.10.01610.1016/j.jallcom.2008.10.016 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.07.16910.1016/j.jallcom.2009.07.169 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.07.01810.1016/j.jallcom.2012.07.018 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.05.13910.1016/j.jallcom.2013.05.139 ↗
8. 10.1007/s11661-014-2395-x10.1007/s11661-014-2395-x ↗
9. 10.1007/s12598-017-0970-110.1007/s12598-017-0970-1 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.09.13210.1016/j.jallcom.2016.09.132 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.12.03410.1016/j.matdes.2016.12.034 ↗
12. 10.1080/13640461.2018.143621410.1080/13640461.2018.1436214 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.10.12510.1016/j.jallcom.2017.10.125 ↗
14. 10.1007/s12666-018-1293-010.1007/s12666-018-1293-0 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.07.06910.1016/j.jallcom.2019.07.069 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.10122710.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101227 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.07.18310.1016/j.jallcom.2009.07.183 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.04.05910.1016/j.jallcom.2011.04.059 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.09.05410.1016/j.jallcom.2017.09.054 ↗
20. 10.1016/S1471-5317(02)00004-410.1016/S1471-5317(02)00004-4 ↗
21. 10.1080/09506608.2015.113769210.1080/09506608.2015.1137692 ↗
22. 10.1007/BF0302741210.1007/BF03027412 ↗
23. 10.1007/BF0302755910.1007/BF03027559 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.11.05110.1016/j.commatsci.2012.11.051 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.16765010.1016/j.jallcom.2022.167650 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.11711710.1016/j.actamat.2021.117117 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jmst.2020.03.05610.1016/j.jmst.2020.03.056 ↗
28. 10.1007/s10853-015-9487-x10.1007/s10853-015-9487-x ↗
29. 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.10.00610.1016/j.matlet.2014.10.006 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.03.00510.1016/j.msea.2014.03.005 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.msea.2016.08.02210.1016/j.msea.2016.08.022 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.matchar.2015.10.03010.1016/j.matchar.2015.10.030 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.16547710.1016/j.jallcom.2022.165477 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jmst.2020.08.00810.1016/j.jmst.2020.08.008 ↗
35. 10.1002/adfm.20210936710.1002/adfm.202109367 ↗
36. 10.1038/s41524-021-00500-010.1038/s41524-021-00500-0 ↗
37. 10.1007/s11661-015-2911-710.1007/s11661-015-2911-7 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.16382810.1016/j.jallcom.2022.163828 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.11743110.1016/j.actamat.2021.117431 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jmst.2021.09.06110.1016/j.jmst.2021.09.061 ↗
41. Yi W, Liu GC, Gao JB, et al. Boosting for concept design of casting aluminum alloys driven by combining computational thermodynamics and machine learning techniques. J Mater Inf. 2021;1(2):11.
42. 10.3390/ma1601030610.3390/ma16010306 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.apmate.2021.09.00510.1016/j.apmate.2021.09.005 ↗
44. 10.1038/s41524-020-0334-510.1038/s41524-020-0334-5 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15615910.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156159 ↗
46. 10.3389/fmats.2022.92429410.3389/fmats.2022.924294 ↗
47. 10.1038/s41524-019-0153-810.1038/s41524-019-0153-8 ↗
48. 10.1038/s41467-021-24523-910.1038/s41467-021-24523-9 ↗
49. 10.1016/S0364-5916(02)00037-810.1016/S0364-5916(02)00037-8 ↗
50. 10.1007/s12613-022-2458-810.1007/s12613-022-2458-8 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.16598410.1016/j.jallcom.2022.165984 ↗
52. 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.0c0010410.1021/acsmaterialslett.0c00104 ↗
53. 10.1007/s11661-020-06132-110.1007/s11661-020-06132-1 ↗
54. 10.1126/science.abo494010.1126/science.abo4940 ↗
55. Amornsamankul S, Pimpunchat B, Triampo W, et al. A comparison of machine learning algorithms and their applications. Int J Simul Syst Sci Technol. 2019;20:8.
56. Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J Mach Learn Res. 2011;12:2825–2830.
57. Paszke A, Gross S, Massa F, et al., editors. Pytorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Vol. 32. Vancouver (BC): Curran Associates, Inc; 2019.
58. 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.03.01010.1016/j.actamat.2019.03.010 ↗
59. Xie J, Su Y, Xue D, et al. Machine learning for materials research and development. Acta Metall Sin. 2021;57(11):1343–1361.
60. 10.1038/s41598-018-21936-310.1038/s41598-018-21936-3 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.10.01410.1016/j.matdes.2018.10.014 ↗
62. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.296622810.1109/ACCESS.2020.2966228 ↗
63. Brochu E Cora VM De Freitas N. A tutorial on Bayesian optimization of expensive cost functions with application to active user modeling and hierarchical reinforcement learning. 2010.
64. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.10101810.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.101018 ↗
65. 10.1038/ncomms1124110.1038/ncomms11241 ↗
66. 10.1038/srep1966010.1038/srep19660 ↗
67. 10.31399/asm.tb.aacppa.978162708335510.31399/asm.tb.aacppa.9781627083355 ↗
68. 10.1038/s41524-021-00658-710.1038/s41524-021-00658-7 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10977710.1016/j.matdes.2021.109777 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.16446810.1016/j.jallcom.2022.164468 ↗
71. 10.1038/s43246-020-00074-210.1038/s43246-020-00074-2 ↗
72. Drouzy M, Jacob S, Richard M. Interpretation of tensile results by means of quality index and probable yield strength. AFS Int Cast Metals J. 1980;5:43–50.