journal article·2022-12-31Open access

Biomimetic materials based on zwitterionic polymers toward human-friendly medical devices

Kazuhiko Ishihara

Abstract

This review summarizes recent research on the design of polymer material systems based on biomimetic concepts and reports on the medical devices that implement these systems. Biomolecules such as proteins, nucleic acids, and phospholipids, present in living organisms, play important roles in biological activities. These molecules are characterized by heterogenic nature with hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity, and a balance of positive and negative charges, which provide unique reaction fields, interfaces, and functionality. Incorporating these molecules into artificial systems is expected to advance material science considerably. This approach to material design is exceptionally practical for medical devices that are in contact with living organisms. Here, it is focused on zwitterionic polymers with intramolecularly balanced charges and introduce examples of their applications in medical devices. Their unique properties make these polymers potential surface modification materials to enhance the performance and safety of conventional medical devices. This review discusses these devices; moreover, new surface technologies have been summarized for developing human-friendly medical devices using zwitterionic polymers in the cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, orthopedic, and ophthalmology fields.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Osaka University

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s40264-019-00878-310.1007/s40264-019-00878-3 ↗
2. 10.1007/s12016-018-8707-y10.1007/s12016-018-8707-y ↗
3. 10.1039/D0BM01284J10.1039/D0BM01284J ↗
4. 10.1099/jmm.0.00003210.1099/jmm.0.000032 ↗
5. 10.2174/09298673270620031615340310.2174/092986732706200316153403 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.nano.2017.08.01210.1016/j.nano.2017.08.012 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.12145010.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121450 ↗
8. 10.1002/adhm.20190168210.1002/adhm.201901682 ↗
9. 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-062117-12094010.1146/annurev-bioeng-062117-120940 ↗
10. 10.2174/092986732566618091411011910.2174/0929867325666180914110119 ↗
11. 10.1083/jcb.20210305210.1083/jcb.202103052 ↗
12. 10.1039/C9BM01392J10.1039/C9BM01392J ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b0055910.1021/acs.accounts.9b00559 ↗
14. 10.1039/D0TB00472C10.1039/D0TB00472C ↗
15. 10.3390/biomimetics503003410.3390/biomimetics5030034 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.04510.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.045 ↗
17. 10.3390/ijms2202094410.3390/ijms22020944 ↗
18. 10.3390/md1509026510.3390/md15090265 ↗
19. 10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060718-03040110.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060718-030401 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsami.1c2220510.1021/acsami.1c22205 ↗
21. Fathi F, Sadrnia M, Arjomandzadegan M, et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of antibacterial and anti-biofilm properties of five ethnomedicinal plants against oral bacteria by TEM. Avicenna J Phytomed. 2021;11(2):180–189.
22. 10.1159/00051019110.1159/000510191 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.06.02110.1016/j.actbio.2019.06.021 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.06.02210.1016/j.actbio.2019.06.022 ↗
25. 10.2186/jpr.JPOR_2019_35610.2186/jpr.JPOR_2019_356 ↗
26. 10.1098/rsta.2009.001110.1098/rsta.2009.0011 ↗
27. 10.3390/nano1202017710.3390/nano12020177 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsabm.1c0093210.1021/acsabm.1c00932 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b0156510.1021/acs.langmuir.8b01565 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b0061010.1021/acs.langmuir.9b00610 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b0030010.1021/acs.accounts.9b00300 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.10410.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.104 ↗
33. 10.1021/la048644y10.1021/la048644y ↗
34. 10.1021/bm200480310.1021/bm2004803 ↗
35. 10.1080/14686996.2021.190809510.1080/14686996.2021.1908095 ↗
36. 10.1007/s10439-010-0025-310.1007/s10439-010-0025-3 ↗
37. 10.1007/s00216-004-2805-910.1007/s00216-004-2805-9 ↗
38. 10.1586/17434440.3.2.16710.1586/17434440.3.2.167 ↗
39. 10.1088/1468-6996/13/6/06410110.1088/1468-6996/13/6/064101 ↗
40. 10.1016/S1468-6996(00)00012-710.1016/S1468-6996(00)00012-7 ↗
41. Lewis AL, Lloyd AW. Biomedical applications of biomimetic polymers: the phosphorylcholine-containing polymers in biomimetic, bioresponsive, and bioactive materials: an introduction to integrating materials with tissues. In: Santin M. Phillips G, editors. Chapter 4, John Wiley & Sons; 2012. p. 95–140.
42. 10.1021/acs.biomac.0c0049710.1021/acs.biomac.0c00497 ↗
43. 10.1080/09205063.2014.92730010.1080/09205063.2014.927300 ↗
44. 10.1038/pj.2014.4610.1038/pj.2014.46 ↗
45. 10.3390/ijms2217932110.3390/ijms22179321 ↗
46. 10.1007/s10965-022-03041-210.1007/s10965-022-03041-2 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2017.07.00610.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2017.07.006 ↗
48. 10.1002/jbm.a.3663510.1002/jbm.a.36635 ↗
49. 10.1295/polymj.22.35510.1295/polymj.22.355 ↗
50. 10.1295/polymj.24.125910.1295/polymj.24.1259 ↗
51. Ishihara K, Fukazawa K. 2-Methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine polymer. In: Monge S, and David G, editors. Phosphorus-based polymers: from synthesis to applications. Cambridge, UK: RSC Publishing; 2014. p. 68–96.
52. 10.1021/ma021032510.1021/ma0210325 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.polymer.2015.01.07010.1016/j.polymer.2015.01.070 ↗
54. 10.1021/la050277i10.1021/la050277i ↗
55. 10.1080/09205063.2020.183934010.1080/09205063.2020.1839340 ↗
56. 10.1002/pola.2109510.1002/pola.21095 ↗
57. 10.1002/mabi.20180048510.1002/mabi.201800485 ↗
58. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c0051210.1021/acs.langmuir.2c00512 ↗
59. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c0167210.1021/acs.langmuir.0c01672 ↗
60. 10.1080/09205063.2017.129827810.1080/09205063.2017.1298278 ↗
61. 10.1038/pj.2015.7010.1038/pj.2015.70 ↗
62. 10.1016/S1359-0294(01)00104-210.1016/S1359-0294(01)00104-2 ↗
63. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b0205710.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02057 ↗
64. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c0041710.1021/acs.langmuir.1c00417 ↗
65. 10.1021/acs.biomac.2c0048410.1021/acs.biomac.2c00484 ↗
66. 10.1246/cl.21060110.1246/cl.210601 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.cossms.2020.10089710.1016/j.cossms.2020.100897 ↗
68. 10.1080/09205063.2014.95299210.1080/09205063.2014.952992 ↗
69. 10.1039/D2TB00242F10.1039/D2TB00242F ↗
70. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b0083810.1021/acs.langmuir.8b00838 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.02.03410.1016/j.actbio.2018.02.034 ↗
72. 10.1021/acsabm.0c0114710.1021/acsabm.0c01147 ↗
73. 10.1021/acsami.0c1774410.1021/acsami.0c17744 ↗
74. 10.1177/088532821983104410.1177/0885328219831044 ↗
75. 10.1097/MAO.000000000000328810.1097/MAO.0000000000003288 ↗
76. 10.1007/s13770-021-00400-w10.1007/s13770-021-00400-w ↗
77. 10.1039/D1TB02323C10.1039/D1TB02323C ↗
78. 10.1039/D2BM00598K10.1039/D2BM00598K ↗
79. 10.1021/jp071995b10.1021/jp071995b ↗
80. 10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00264-510.1016/S0032-3861(99)00264-5 ↗
81. 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.08.00410.1016/j.jcis.2021.08.004 ↗
82. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c0128710.1021/acs.langmuir.0c01287 ↗
83. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.7b0059210.1021/acsmacrolett.7b00592 ↗
84. 10.4068/cmj.2019.55.1.110.4068/cmj.2019.55.1.1 ↗
85. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.1c0064310.1021/acsmacrolett.1c00643 ↗
86. 10.1021/jacs.5b1315610.1021/jacs.5b13156 ↗
87. 10.1021/acs.biomac.0c0012010.1021/acs.biomac.0c00120 ↗
88. 10.1126/sciadv.aaw956210.1126/sciadv.aaw9562 ↗
89. 10.1002/wnan.160010.1002/wnan.1600 ↗
90. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.07.04310.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.07.043 ↗
91. 10.1021/acs.est.7b0618310.1021/acs.est.7b06183 ↗
92. 10.1021/acsomega.9b0033910.1021/acsomega.9b00339 ↗
93. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.10420910.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104209 ↗
94. 10.1016/j.cis.2021.10245110.1016/j.cis.2021.102451 ↗
95. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b0151510.1021/acs.langmuir.8b01515 ↗
96. 10.1021/la303690210.1021/la3036902 ↗
97. 10.1021/la001525810.1021/la0015258 ↗
98. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.05.02910.1016/j.actbio.2016.05.029 ↗
99. 10.1039/D0SC03690K10.1039/D0SC03690K ↗
100. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.06.03410.1016/j.actbio.2017.06.034 ↗