Constitutive modelling of hot deformation behaviour of a CoCrFeMnNi high-entropy alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
Models describing the constitutive flow behaviour of a metallic material are desired for appropriate process design and realization of defect-free components. In this study, constitutive equations based on the hyperbolic-sinusoidal Arrhenius-type model have been developed to define the hot deformation characteristics of a CoCrFeMnNi high-entropy alloy. The experimental true stress-true strain data were generated over a wide temperature (1023–1423 K) and strain rates (10−3–10 s−1) ranges. The impact of strain rate and temperature on deformation behaviour was further characterized through a temperature compensated strain rate parameter, i.e. Zener-Hollomon parameter. Additionally, a mathematical relation was employed to express the influence of various material constants on true-strain ranging from 0.2 to 0.75. Typical third order polynomial relations were found to be appropriate to fit the true-strain dependency of these material constants. The accuracy of the developed constitutive equations was evaluated by using the average absolute relative error (AARE) and correlation coefficient (R); the obtained values were 7.63% and 0.9858, respectively, suggesting reasonable predictions. These results demonstrate that the developed constitutive equations can predict the flow stress behaviour of the alloy with a good accuracy over a wide range of temperature and strain rate conditions and for large strains.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High Entropy Alloys Studies · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · High Temperature Alloys and Creep
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Materials Science and Environmental Engineering, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
Materials and Mechanical Engineering, Centre for Advanced Steels Research, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adem.20030056710.1002/adem.200300567 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.msea.2003.10.25710.1016/j.msea.2003.10.257 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.mattod.2015.11.02610.1016/j.mattod.2015.11.026 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.08.08110.1016/j.actamat.2016.08.081 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.msea.2015.08.01010.1016/j.msea.2015.08.010 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.intermet.2013.08.01610.1016/j.intermet.2013.08.016 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.intermet.2012.03.00510.1016/j.intermet.2012.03.005 ↗
8. 10.1038/nature1798110.1038/nature17981 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41598-017-10774-410.1038/s41598-017-10774-4 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.04.00410.1016/j.actamat.2018.04.004 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.28610.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.286 ↗
12. 10.1557/jmr.2018.21410.1557/jmr.2018.214 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.03.37310.1016/j.jallcom.2019.03.373 ↗
14. 10.1126/science.125458110.1126/science.1254581 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.mattod.2019.03.00110.1016/j.mattod.2019.03.001 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.11.04910.1016/j.actamat.2018.11.049 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.wear.2019.03.00210.1016/j.wear.2019.03.002 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.10.00710.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.10.007 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.wear.2019.03.02610.1016/j.wear.2019.03.026 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.12.01710.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.12.017 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.02.12110.1016/j.jallcom.2014.02.121 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.09.34210.1016/j.jallcom.2018.09.342 ↗
23. Zhang KB · Mater Sci Eng A · 2009 · 508
24. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.05.02010.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.05.020 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.10.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.10.001 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.10.23710.1016/j.jallcom.2013.10.237 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.06.01810.1016/j.actamat.2013.06.018 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.08.20010.1016/j.jallcom.2018.08.200 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.intermet.2014.05.01410.1016/j.intermet.2014.05.014 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.msea.2015.03.10910.1016/j.msea.2015.03.109 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.04.00510.1016/j.actamat.2016.04.005 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.07.03010.1016/j.actamat.2015.07.030 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.msea.2019.04.05710.1016/j.msea.2019.04.057 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.06.06210.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.06.062 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.msea.2015.03.09710.1016/j.msea.2015.03.097 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.04.05810.1016/j.actamat.2013.04.058 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.12.00210.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.12.002 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.msea.2013.12.07610.1016/j.msea.2013.12.076 ↗
39. 10.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-910.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.33802410.1063/1.338024 ↗
41. 10.1016/0001-6160(66)90207-010.1016/0001-6160(66)90207-0 ↗
42. 10.1038/s41598-018-23617-710.1038/s41598-018-23617-7 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.msea.2013.09.04910.1016/j.msea.2013.09.049 ↗
44. ASM International Edited by Prasad, YVRK, Rao KP, Sasidhar S. Hot Working guide: a compendium of processing maps. 2nd ed. Google Books; ASM International; 2015.
45. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.12.21210.1016/j.jallcom.2018.12.212 ↗
46. 10.1063/1.170736310.1063/1.1707363 ↗
47. 10.1007/s11665-017-2609-710.1007/s11665-017-2609-7 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.intermet.2014.06.01510.1016/j.intermet.2014.06.015 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.12.05210.1016/j.actamat.2017.12.052 ↗