journal article·2021-12-31Open access

Mechanical properties and fluid permeability of gyroid and diamond lattice structures for intervertebral devices: functional requirements and comparative analysis

Anatolie Timercan, Vadim Sheremetyev, Vladimir Brailovski

Abstract

Current intervertebral fusion devices present multiple complication risks such as a lack of fixation, device migration and subsidence. An emerging solution to these problems is the use of additively manufactured lattice structures that are mechanically compliant and permeable to fluids, thus promoting osseointegration and reducing complication risks. Strut-based diamond and sheet-based gyroid lattice configurations having a pore diameter of 750 µm and levels of porosity of 60, 70 and 80% are designed and manufactured from Ti-6Al-4V alloy using laser powder bed fusion. The resulting structures are CT–scanned, compression tested and subjected to fluid permeability evaluation. The stiffness of both structures (1.9–4.8 GPa) is comparable to that of bone, while their mechanical resistance (52–160 MPa) is greater than that of vertebrae (3–6 MPa), thus decreasing the risks of wither bone or implant failure. The fluid permeability (5–57 × 10−9 m2) and surface-to-volume ratios (~3) of both lattice structures are close to those of vertebrae. This study shows that both types of lattice structures can be produced to suit the application specifications within certain limits imposed by physical and equipment-related constraints, providing potential solutions for reducing the complication rate of spinal devices by offering a better fixation through osseointegration.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics · Engineering Technology and Methodologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, École de Technologie Supérieure, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Metal Forming Department, National University of Science and Technology MISiS, Moscow, Russia

Funding

Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Nature et Technologies · Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada · Fonds de Développement de l’École de Technologie Supérieure

References (72)

Show source-provided references
1. Murphy K · 2006
2. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.07.02210.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.07.022 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.01.03210.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.01.032 ↗
4. 10.1007/s00586-013-2772-y10.1007/s00586-013-2772-y ↗
5. 10.1007/s00586-014-3466-910.1007/s00586-014-3466-9 ↗
6. 10.1007/s00586-009-1036-310.1007/s00586-009-1036-3 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.08.00710.1016/j.spinee.2018.08.007 ↗
8. 10.1002/jbm.b.1053010.1002/jbm.b.10530 ↗
9. 10.3928/01477447-20170810-0410.3928/01477447-20170810-04 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.prostr.2018.12.06210.1016/j.prostr.2018.12.062 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.14410.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.144 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.11.16010.1016/j.wneu.2017.11.160 ↗
13. Head WC · Clin Orthop Relat Res · 1995 · 85
14. 10.1098/rsta.2005.167810.1098/rsta.2005.1678 ↗
15. 10.1039/C9TB00420C10.1039/C9TB00420C ↗
16. 10.1016/S0883-5403(99)90063-310.1016/S0883-5403(99)90063-3 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.06910.1016/j.msec.2015.10.069 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.msec.2015.11.02510.1016/j.msec.2015.11.025 ↗
19. 10.1007/s00586-016-4473-910.1007/s00586-016-4473-9 ↗
20. Mahmoud D · J Manuf Mater Process · 2017 · 1 · 13
21. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.12.00610.1016/j.addma.2017.12.006 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10570210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105702 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2007.06.00310.1016/j.advwatres.2007.06.003 ↗
24. 10.1016/S8756-3282(95)00165-410.1016/S8756-3282(95)00165-4 ↗
25. 10.1002/aja.100189010910.1002/aja.1001890109 ↗
26. 10.1097/00007632-198810000-0000210.1097/00007632-198810000-00002 ↗
27. 10.1097/00007632-199203000-0001010.1097/00007632-199203000-00010 ↗
28. 10.3109/1745367760899896610.3109/17453677608998966 ↗
29. Wolfram U · Bonekey Rep · 2016 · 510.1038/bonekey.2016.60 ↗
30. Davis JR · 2003
31. 10.1080/10255842.2011.56575110.1080/10255842.2011.565751 ↗
32. 10.1016/S1350-4533(97)00030-110.1016/S1350-4533(97)00030-1 ↗
33. 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.1.8910.1359/jbmr.1997.12.1.89 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.09.02710.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.09.027 ↗
35. Food and Drug Administration · 2007
36. Martin RB · Crit Rev Biomed Eng · 1984 · 10 · 179
37. 10.1016/j.bone.2014.11.01610.1016/j.bone.2014.11.016 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.09.00610.1016/j.engstruct.2012.09.006 ↗
39. 10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00246-X10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00246-X ↗
40. 10.1114/1.19510.1114/1.195 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.11.00110.1016/j.medengphy.2014.11.001 ↗
42. 10.1080/17452759.2018.149171310.1080/17452759.2018.1491713 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.01.01610.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.01.016 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.01.01310.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.01.013 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.09.05310.1016/j.matdes.2018.09.053 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.10352010.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103520 ↗
47. Zhang X-Y · Addit Manuf · 2020 · 32 · 101015
48. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.10548010.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105480 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.11636710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116367 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10875410.1016/j.matdes.2020.108754 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10903410.1016/j.matdes.2020.109034 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.02.02410.1016/j.actbio.2017.02.024 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.02110.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.021 ↗
54. Soul H · J Manuf Mater Process · 2018 · 2 · 25
55. 10.1007/s00170-021-06773-510.1007/s00170-021-06773-5 ↗
56. Maskery I · Addit Manuf · 2020 · 36 · 101548
57. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.10424310.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104243 ↗
58. 10.1007/BF0242784610.1007/BF02427846 ↗
59. 10.1016/0021-9290(74)90019-010.1016/0021-9290(74)90019-0 ↗
60. 10.1007/s00170-020-05361-310.1007/s00170-020-05361-3 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.05010.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.050 ↗
62. ISO13314. Mechanical testing of metals — ductility testing — compression test for porous and cellular metals.
63. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.08.03410.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.08.034 ↗
64. ASTM. F2450-18 standard guide for assessing microstructure of polymeric scaffolds for use in tissue-engineered medical products.
65. ASTM. B963-17 standard test methods for oil content, oil-impregnation efficiency, and surface-connected porosity of sintered powder metallurgy (PM) products using Archimedes’ principle.
66. Sobieski W · 2014
67. 10.1007/BF0019215210.1007/BF00192152 ↗
68. 10.1029/2011WR01178810.1029/2011WR011788 ↗
69. 10.3390/ma1208131310.3390/ma12081313 ↗
70. 10.3389/fphy.2018.0007610.3389/fphy.2018.00076 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10139210.1016/j.addma.2020.101392 ↗
72. MatWeb. Polyetheretherketone material properties (unreinforced). 2019 [cited 2019 Sep 1]. Available from: http://www.matweb.com/search/DataSheet.aspx?MatGUID=2164cacabcde4391a596640d553b2ebe&ckck=1