Deep-learning-based inverse design of three-dimensional architected cellular materials with the target porosity and stiffness using voxelized Voronoi lattices
Source abstract
Abstract
Architected cellular materials are a class of artificial materials with cellular architecture-dependent properties. Typically, designing cellular architectures paves the way to generate architected cellular materials with specific properties. However, most previous studies have primarily focused on a forward design strategy, wherein a geometry is generated using computer-aided design modeling, and its properties are investigated experimentally or via simulations. In this study, we developed an inverse design framework for a disordered architected cellular material (Voronoi lattices) using deep learning. This inverse design framework is a three-dimensional conditional generative adversarial network (3D-CGAN) trained based on supervised learning using a dataset consisting of voxelized Voronoi lattices and their corresponding relative densities and Young's moduli. A well-trained 3D-CGAN adopts variational sampling to generate multiple distinct Voronoi lattices with the target relative density and Young's modulus. Consequently, the mechanical properties of the 3D-CGAN generated Voronoi lattices are validated through uniaxial compression tests and finite element simulations. The inverse design framework demonstrates potential for use in bone implants, where scaffold implants can be automatically generated with the target relative density and Young's modulus.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Advanced Materials and Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Tsukuba
National Institute for Materials Science
Funding
JSPS · Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology · Japan Science and Technology Agency
References (75)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41578-022-00450-z10.1038/s41578-022-00450-z ↗
2. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-03162410.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-031624 ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20170185010.1002/adma.201701850 ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20200797710.1002/adma.202007977 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.11449010.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114490 ↗
6. 10.1126/science.121164910.1126/science.1211649 ↗
7. 10.1126/science.125229110.1126/science.1252291 ↗
8. 10.1038/nmat469410.1038/nmat4694 ↗
9. 10.1002/adma.20130198610.1002/adma.201301986 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10931310.1016/j.matdes.2020.109313 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.11017810.1016/j.matdes.2021.110178 ↗
12. 10.1002/adma.20160165010.1002/adma.201601650 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41586-019-1538-z10.1038/s41586-019-1538-z ↗
14. 10.1002/adfm.20210512810.1002/adfm.202105128 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41586-021-03698-710.1038/s41586-021-03698-7 ↗
16. 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.6610.1038/natrevmats.2017.66 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.apmt.2022.10166210.1016/j.apmt.2022.101662 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41586-019-1736-810.1038/s41586-019-1736-8 ↗
19. 10.1038/s41467-019-11986-010.1038/s41467-019-11986-0 ↗
20. 10.1039/C9MH00302A10.1039/C9MH00302A ↗
21. 10.1038/srep3111010.1038/srep31110 ↗
22. 10.1002/adma.20210129810.1002/adma.202101298 ↗
23. 10.1002/aisy.20200006010.1002/aisy.202000060 ↗
24. 10.1126/scirobotics.aav449410.1126/scirobotics.aav4494 ↗
25. 10.1126/scirobotics.aay902410.1126/scirobotics.aay9024 ↗
26. 10.1002/adfm.20180871310.1002/adfm.201808713 ↗
27. 10.1002/adma.20170658910.1002/adma.201706589 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.13631710.1016/j.cej.2022.136317 ↗
29. 10.1039/C7MH00699C10.1039/C7MH00699C ↗
30. 10.1021/acsomega.1c0543710.1021/acsomega.1c05437 ↗
31. 10.1002/adma.20210930410.1002/adma.202109304 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10983810.1016/j.matdes.2021.109838 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.coelec.2020.02.01110.1016/j.coelec.2020.02.011 ↗
34. 10.1557/mrs.2019.22910.1557/mrs.2019.229 ↗
35. 10.1038/nature2104410.1038/nature21044 ↗
36. 10.1126/science.aao464010.1126/science.aao4640 ↗
37. 10.1038/nature2107510.1038/nature21075 ↗
38. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-03182610.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-031826 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jmps.2018.01.01310.1016/j.jmps.2018.01.013 ↗
40. 10.3389/fbioe.2021.61714110.3389/fbioe.2021.617141 ↗
41. 10.1038/s41524-020-0341-610.1038/s41524-020-0341-6 ↗
42. 10.1126/sciadv.abj673110.1126/sciadv.abj6731 ↗
43. Bastek JH, Kumar S, Telgen B, et al. Inverting the structure–property map of truss metamaterials by deep learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2022;119(1):e2111505119.
44. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.11027810.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110278 ↗
45. 10.1038/s41524-020-0309-610.1038/s41524-020-0309-6 ↗
46. 10.1126/sciadv.aaz416910.1126/sciadv.aaz4169 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10909810.1016/j.matdes.2020.109098 ↗
48. 10.3390/ma1510358110.3390/ma15103581 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.10774110.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107741 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.11170210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.111702 ↗
51. 10.1080/00401706.2000.1048597810.1080/00401706.2000.10485978 ↗
52. 10.1007/s10853-018-2285-510.1007/s10853-018-2285-5 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.cma.2020.11324210.1016/j.cma.2020.113242 ↗
54. 10.1115/1.404055510.1115/1.4040555 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.09.00610.1016/j.commatsci.2013.09.006 ↗
56. Said B, Salah M, Kanit T, et al. On the homogenization of 2D porous material with determination of RVE. International Journal of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering. 2016;16(1):81–86.
57. 10.1017/CBO978113987832610.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
58. 10.1002/nme.326410.1002/nme.3264 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.cma.2020.11337710.1016/j.cma.2020.113377 ↗
60. 10.1115/1.405381410.1115/1.4053814 ↗
61. Wu J, Zhang C, Xue T, et al. Learning a probabilistic latent space of object shapes via 3D generative-adversarial modeling. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2016;29:82–90.
62. 10.1145/342262210.1145/3422622 ↗
63. 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.289910810.1109/ACCESS.2019.2899108 ↗
64. 10.1109/3DV.2016.7910.1109/3DV.2016.79 ↗
65. Zguris Z. How mechanical properties of stereolithography 3D prints are affected by UV curing. Formlabs White Paper. 2016. p. 1–11.
66. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.10.02810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.10.028 ↗
67. 10.1007/s00466-020-01943-w10.1007/s00466-020-01943-w ↗
68. 10.1002/adma.20150248510.1002/adma.201502485 ↗
69. 10.1007/978-3-319-19440-0_2410.1007/978-3-319-19440-0_24 ↗
70. 10.1038/s41578-020-0204-210.1038/s41578-020-0204-2 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.mattod.2020.11.02110.1016/j.mattod.2020.11.021 ↗
72. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0406210.1021/acs.jpcc.8b04062 ↗
73. 10.1039/C7EE03571C10.1039/C7EE03571C ↗
74. Warde-Farley D, Goodfellow I. 11 adversarial perturbations of deep neural networks. Perturbations, Optimization, and Statistics. 2016;311:5.
75. Salimans T, Goodfellow I, Zaremba W, et al. Improved techniques for training gans. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2016;29:2234–2242.