Source abstract
Abstract
Development and commercialization of self-healing concrete is hampered due to a lack of standardized test methods. Six inter-laboratory testing programs are being executed by the EU COST action SARCOS, each focusing on test methods for a specific self-healing technique. This paper reports on the comparison of tests for mortar and concrete specimens with polyurethane encapsulated in glass macrocapsules. First, the pre-cracking method was analysed: mortar specimens were cracked in a three-point bending test followed by an active crack width control technique to restrain the crack width up to a predefined value, while the concrete specimens were cracked in a three-point bending setup with a displacement-controlled loading system. Microscopic measurements showed that with the application of the active control technique almost all crack widths were within a narrow predefined range. Conversely, for the concrete specimens the variation on the crack width was higher. After pre-cracking, the self-healing effect was characterized via durability tests: the mortar specimens were tested in a water permeability test and the spread of the healing agent on the crack surfaces was determined, while the concrete specimens were subjected to two capillary water absorption tests, executed with a different type of waterproofing applied on the zone around the crack. The quality of the waterproofing was found to be important, as different results were obtained in each absorption test. For the permeability test, 4 out of 6 labs obtained a comparable flow rate for the reference specimens, yet all 6 labs obtained comparable sealing efficiencies, highlighting the potential for further standardization.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Affiliations
Magnel-Vandepitte Laboratory, Department of Structural Engineering and Building Materials, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Department of Structural, Geotechnical and Building Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy
Responsible Risk Resilience Centre, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy
Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, Cracow, Poland
KU Leuven, Department of Civil Engineering, Materials and Constructions, Ghent Technology Campus, Ghent, Belgium
Department of Building Materials and Products, Institute of Materials and Structures, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Riga Technical University, LV-Riga, Latvia
Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
INSTM Research Unit PoliTO-LINCE Laboratory, Department of Applied Science and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy
Funding
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · European Cooperation in Science and Technology · H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions · Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport
References (57)
Show source-provided references
6. COST Action SARCOS homepage 2020 cited 2020 May 29. Available from: https://www.sarcos.eng.cam.ac.uk/
13. De Belie N · 2020
14. SMARTINCS homepage 2020 cited 2020 May 29. Available from: http://www.smartincs.eu
19. Thao TDP. Quasi-brittle self-healing materials: numerical modelling and applications in civil engineering: National University of Signapore; 2011.
21. Joseph C · 2007
34. Tziviloglou E · 2014 · 650
44. Tziviloglou E · 2016
48. Garcia Feiteira JL · 2016
49. Hanne, Bumanis, Girts, Litina, Chrysoula, … De Belie, Nele. (2020). Raw data and supplementary material of the fifth inter-laboratory testing program (RRT5, self-healing concrete with macrocapsules) of the EU COST action SARCOS (Version v1.0) [Data set]. Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3865635
56. Van Mullem, Tim, Anglani, Giovanni, Dudek, Marta, Vanoutrive, Hanne, Bumanis, Girts, Litina, Chrysoula, … De Belie, Nele. (2020). Raw data and supplementary material of the fifth inter-laboratory testing program (RRT5, self-healing concrete with macrocapsules) of the EU COST action SARCOS (Version v1.0) [Data set]. Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3865635