Self-assisted wound healing using piezoelectric and triboelectric nanogenerators
Source abstract
Abstract
The complex process of wound healing depends on the coordinated interaction between various immunological and biological systems, which can be aided by technology. This present review provides a broad overview of the medical applications of piezoelectric and triboelectric nanogenerators, focusing on their role in the development of wound healing technology. Based on the finding that the damaged epithelial layer of the wound generates an endogenous bioelectric field to regulate the wound healing process, development of technological device for providing an exogenous electric field has therefore been paid attention. Authors of this review focus on the design and application of piezoelectric and triboelectric materials to manufacture self-powered nanogenerators, and conclude with an outlook on the current challenges and future potential in meeting medical needs and commercialization.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Conducting polymers and applications · Dielectric materials and actuators
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Tsing Hua University
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Chang Gung University
Industrial Technology Research Institute
Funding
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and National Tsing Hua University Joint Research Program
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/ed058pA314.210.1021/ed058pA314.2 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.sna.2015.03.02510.1016/j.sna.2015.03.025 ↗
3. Mohammadi MM. A comparison between quartz and PZT ceramic for sensoric applications. Res Desk. 2015;2(4):321–325.
4. 10.1002/app.3941510.1002/app.39415 ↗
5. 10.1088/0964-1726/23/3/03300110.1088/0964-1726/23/3/033001 ↗
6. 10.1038/srep2508710.1038/srep25087 ↗
7. 10.1109/TUFFC.2003.123532810.1109/TUFFC.2003.1235328 ↗
8. 10.1038/srep1072810.1038/srep10728 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.233699910.1063/1.2336999 ↗
10. Telega JJ, Wojnar R. Piezoelectric effects in biological tissues. J Theor Appl Mech. 2002;40(3):723–759.
11. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1974.tb26776.x10.1111/j.1749-6632.1974.tb26776.x ↗
12. 10.1080/0015019840801752910.1080/00150198408017529 ↗
13. 10.1143/JPSJ.26.77710.1143/JPSJ.26.777 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0703810.1021/acsnano.8b07038 ↗
15. 10.1007/s13167-017-0081-y10.1007/s13167-017-0081-y ↗
16. Guo S, Dipietro, LA. Factors affecting wound healing . J Dent Res 89 (03) . 2010 219–229 .
17. 10.1002/adma.20190254910.1002/adma.201902549 ↗
18. 10.1080/14686996.2019.169388010.1080/14686996.2019.1693880 ↗
19. Hunt TK, Hopf H, Hussain Z. Physiology of wound healing. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2000 May-Jun;13(2 Suppl):6–11.
20. Broughton G 2nd, Janis JE, Attinger CE. Wound healing: an overview. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Jun;117(7Suppl):1e-S-32e-S.
21. Vanwijck R. Surgical biology of wound healing. Bull Mem Acad R Med Belg. 2001;156(3–4):175–84; discussion 185.
22. 10.1016/S0070-2153(03)58001-210.1016/S0070-2153(03)58001-2 ↗
23. 10.1089/wound.2013.044210.1089/wound.2013.0442 ↗
24. 10.1038/nprot.2007.20510.1038/nprot.2007.205 ↗
25. 10.1089/ten.tea.2010.003010.1089/ten.tea.2010.0030 ↗
26. Murphy PS, Evans GR. Advances in wound healing: a review of current wound healing products. Plast Surg Int. 2012;2012:190436.
27. 10.3390/healthcare204044510.3390/healthcare2040445 ↗
28. 10.1002/jcp.1014410.1002/jcp.10144 ↗
29. 10.1097/00007632-200211150-0000310.1097/00007632-200211150-00003 ↗
30. 10.1038/nature0492510.1038/nature04925 ↗
31. 10.1002/adfm.20160349710.1002/adfm.201603497 ↗
32. 10.1097/00007611-196907000-0000810.1097/00007611-196907000-00008 ↗
33. 10.1007/BF0244696310.1007/BF02446963 ↗
34. 10.3402/dfa.v4i0.2208110.3402/dfa.v4i0.22081 ↗
35. 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1993.tb00420.x10.1111/j.1524-4725.1993.tb00420.x ↗
36. 10.1111/1523-1747.ep1254349810.1111/1523-1747.ep12543498 ↗
37. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-186X(1996)17:6<450::AID-BEM4>3.0.CO;2-210.1002/(SICI)1521-186X(1996)17:6<450::AID-BEM4>3.0.CO;2-2 ↗
38. 10.4049/jimmunol.181.4.246510.4049/jimmunol.181.4.2465 ↗
39. Sosa IJ, Reyes O, Kuffler DP. Elimination of a pressure ulcer with electrical stimulation–a case study. P R Health Sci J. 2008 Jun;27(2):175–179.
40. 10.1006/smim.2001.034310.1006/smim.2001.0343 ↗
41. 10.1002/bies.1030710.1002/bies.10307 ↗
42. 10.1242/jcs.0112510.1242/jcs.01125 ↗
43. 10.1152/physrev.00020.200410.1152/physrev.00020.2004 ↗
44. 10.1111/1523-1747.ep1234545610.1111/1523-1747.ep12345456 ↗
45. 10.1091/mbc.10.4.125910.1091/mbc.10.4.1259 ↗
46. Chang PC, Sulik GI, Soong HK, et al. Galvanotropic and galvanotaxic responses of corneal endothelial cells. J Formos Med Assoc. 1996 Aug;95(8):623–627.
47. 10.1242/jcs.0086810.1242/jcs.00868 ↗
48. 10.1038/nrm80910.1038/nrm809 ↗
49. 10.1002/jor.110003030810.1002/jor.1100030308 ↗
50. 10.1021/nn900472n10.1021/nn900472n ↗
51. 10.1002/adfm.20100207710.1002/adfm.201002077 ↗
52. 10.1063/1.496162310.1063/1.4961623 ↗
53. 10.1063/1.507418410.1063/1.5074184 ↗
54. 10.1088/0034-4885/61/9/00210.1088/0034-4885/61/9/002 ↗
55. 10.1021/acsami.7b1425710.1021/acsami.7b14257 ↗
56. 10.3390/s1811360510.3390/s18113605 ↗
57. 10.1016/B0-08-042993-9/00145-510.1016/B0-08-042993-9/00145-5 ↗
58. 10.3390/mi1112107610.3390/mi11121076 ↗
59. 10.1021/nl102959k10.1021/nl102959k ↗
60. 10.1039/c0ee00137f10.1039/c0ee00137f ↗
61. 10.3390/ma908067110.3390/ma9080671 ↗
62. T A G C Y-S L. inventorsSystem and method for a piezoelectric scaffold for nerve growth and repair2016a.
63. 10.1088/0957-4484/20/8/08570610.1088/0957-4484/20/8/085706 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.07.01010.1016/j.actbio.2015.07.010 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.02.02010.1016/j.medengphy.2014.02.020 ↗
66. 10.1007/s11051-011-0344-910.1007/s11051-011-0344-9 ↗
67. 10.1002/advs.20170002910.1002/advs.201700029 ↗
68. 10.1021/nn404614z10.1021/nn404614z ↗
69. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.11.05910.1016/j.nanoen.2014.11.059 ↗
70. 10.1002/adma.20150429910.1002/adma.201504299 ↗
71. 10.1021/nl401300210.1021/nl4013002 ↗
72. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0196810.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01968 ↗
73. 10.1002/adma.20160566810.1002/adma.201605668 ↗
74. 10.1002/adma.20140056210.1002/adma.201400562 ↗
75. 10.1126/science.112400510.1126/science.1124005 ↗
76. 10.1002/adfm.20160349710.1002/adfm.201603497 ↗
77. 10.1039/c3ee24230g10.1039/c3ee24230g ↗
78. 10.1126/science.112400510.1126/science.1124005 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.matchar.2011.11.01710.1016/j.matchar.2011.11.017 ↗
80. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.00910.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.009 ↗
81. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.02.04610.1016/j.nanoen.2016.02.046 ↗
82. 10.1021/nl302560k10.1021/nl302560k ↗
83. 10.1002/aenm.20180290610.1002/aenm.201802906 ↗
84. 10.1063/1.497995410.1063/1.4979954 ↗
85. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.11.02310.1016/j.nanoen.2017.11.023 ↗
86. 10.3390/nano903034910.3390/nano9030349 ↗
87. 10.1007/s12274-020-2891-910.1007/s12274-020-2891-9 ↗
88. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0129010.1021/acsnano.5b01290 ↗
89. 10.1097/00006534-197001000-0005310.1097/00006534-197001000-00053 ↗
90. 10.1007/s12274-017-1549-810.1007/s12274-017-1549-8 ↗
91. 10.1088/1748-3182/6/4/04500610.1088/1748-3182/6/4/045006 ↗
92. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.03.01410.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.03.014 ↗
93. 10.12968/jowc.2006.15.3.2687910.12968/jowc.2006.15.3.26879 ↗
94. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00910.201810.1152/japplphysiol.00910.2018 ↗
95. 10.1016/j.apmt.2020.10075610.1016/j.apmt.2020.100756 ↗
96. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0767810.1021/acsnano.5b07678 ↗
97. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.01.03310.1016/j.nanoen.2018.01.033 ↗
98. Kim KN Biocompatible and Flexible Nanogenerators for Wearable and Implantable Mechano-Energy Harvester; 2015.
99. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.12.07710.1016/j.nanoen.2018.12.077 ↗
100. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10546310.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105463 ↗