journal article·2026-01-23Open access

A comprehensive experimental investigation to evaluate the impact of MWCNTs on the mechanical attributes of GFRP/CFRP composites for unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) structure

Ahmad Hosseini, Ma Yubo, Xing Shen, Huimin He

Abstract

Abstract Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) technology has revolutionized numerous sectors, including precision agriculture, infrastructure inspection and defense. Consequently, there is a critical need to develop a unique composite structures that offer high durability, low density, and enhanced mechanical properties for UAV airframes. This study addresses this demand by investigating the enhancement of glass and carbon fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP/CFRP) composites through the integration of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs at 0.5 and 1 wt%). The mechanical properties including tensile, flexural, and interlaminar shear strength (ILSS) were experimentally characterized and microstructural analysis was performed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The results indicated that carbon fiber composites (CFRP) with 1.0 wt% MWCNTs achieved a strength of 289 MPa, representing a 9.5 % improvement in tensile strength over the 0.5 wt% CFRP. However, the CFRP with 0.5 wt% MWCNTs demonstrated better performance in both flexural and ILSS strength, exhibiting 8.8 % and 13.6 % higher than the 1.0 wt% CFRP sample, respectively the same pattern was observed for glass fiber composites (GFRP), where the 0.5 wt% MWCNTs showed higher flexural and ILSS characteristics compared to the 1.0 wt% GFRP sample. SEM analysis confirmed that the superior performance of the 0.5 wt% samples was due to better fiber-matrix adhesion and uniform dispersion. It was concluded that a 0.5 wt% MWCNTs is optimal for both CFRP and GFRP, providing the best balance of mechanical properties for weight sensitive UAV applications, while higher concentrations lead to property degradation due to agglomeration.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Smart Materials for Construction · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Aerospace Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics , Nanjing , China

Institute for Frontier Science, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics , Nanjing 210016 , China

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. Sdoukou, E, Milidonis, A, Efstathiou, K, Voyiatzis, I. A survey of UAV hardware selection. J Eng Appl Sci 2025;72:88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-025-00645-5.10.1186/s44147-025-00645-5 ↗
2. Zhang, N, Xu, LZ, An, TH, Zhang, JG, Guo, H. Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) aeromagnetic system based on fluxgate sensor and its applications. Appl Geophys 2025;15:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11770-025-1248-2.10.1007/s11770-025-1248-2 ↗
3. Rojas Viloria, D, Solano-Charris, EL, Muñoz-Villamizar, A, Montoya-Torres, JR. Unmanned aerial vehicles/drones in vehicle routing problems: a literature review. Int Trans Oper Res 2021;28:1626–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12783.10.1111/itor.12783 ↗
4. Chen, B, Maurer, J, Gong, W. Applications of UAV in landslide research: a review: B. Chen et al. Landslides 2025;13:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-025-02547-2.10.1007/s10346-025-02547-2 ↗
5. Emimi, M, Khaleel, M, Alkrash, A. The current opportunities and challenges in drone technology. Int J Electr Eng Sustain 2023;20:74–89. https://doi.org/10.65998/ijees.v1i3.47. https://ijees.org/index.php/ijees/article/view/4.10.65998/ijees.v1i3.47 ↗
6. Studiawan, H, Grispos, G, Choo, KK. Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) forensics: the good, the bad, and the unaddressed. Comput Secur 2023;132:103340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2023.103340.10.1016/j.cose.2023.103340 ↗
7. Studiawan, H, Choo, KK. Drone and UAV forensics: a Hands-On approach. Cham: Springer Nature; 2025.10.1007/978-3-031-93511-4 ↗
8. Maghazei, O, Netland, T. Drones in manufacturing: exploring opportunities for research and practice. J Manuf Technol Manag 2020;31:1237–59. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-03-2019-0099.10.1108/JMTM-03-2019-0099 ↗
9. Sanklong, N, Pitayachaval, P. The challenges and opportunities of UAV industry in Thailand. Advances in Manufacturing Processes and Smart Manufacturing Systems 2025;495. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202503.0495.v1.10.20944/preprints202503.0495.v1 ↗
10. Choi, HW, Kim, HJ, Kim, SK, Na, WS. An overview of drone applications in the construction industry. Drones 2023;7:515. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7080515.10.3390/drones7080515 ↗
11. Abdulrahman, GA, Qasem, NA, Abdelrahman, WG, Abdallah, AM. A review of powering unmanned aerial vehicles by clean and renewable energy technologies. Sustain Energy Technol Assessments 2025;73:104150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2024.104150.10.1016/j.seta.2024.104150 ↗
12. Hassanalian, M, Abdelkefi, A. Classifications, applications, and design challenges of drones: a review. Prog Aero Sci 2017;91:99–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.10.1016/j.paerosci.2017.04.003 ↗
13. ElFaham, MM, Mostafa, AM, Nasr, GM. Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) manufacturing materials: synthesis, spectroscopic characterization and dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA). J Mol Struct 2020;1201:127211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2019.127211.10.1016/j.molstruc.2019.127211 ↗
14. Hairi, SM, Saleh, SJ, Ariffin, AH, Omar, ZB. A review on composite aerostructure development for UAV application. Green Hybrid Compos Eng Non-Eng Appl 2023:137–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1583-5_9.10.1007/978-981-99-1583-5_9 ↗
15. Kantaros, A, Drosos, C, Papoutsidakis, M, Pallis, E, Ganetsos, T. Composite filament materials for 3D-Printed drone parts: advancements in mechanical strength, weight optimization and embedded electronics. Materials 2025;18:2465. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18112465.10.3390/ma18112465 ↗
16. Lehto, M, Hutchinson, B. Mini-drones swarms and their potential in conflict situations. In: 15th international conference on cyber warfare and security; 2020, vol 12:326–34 pp.
17. Mohsan, SA, Khan, MA, Noor, F, Ullah, I, Alsharif, MH. Towards the unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs): a comprehensive review. Drones 2022;6:147. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones6060147.10.3390/drones6060147 ↗
18. Easter, S, Turman, J, Sheffler, D, Balazs, M, Rotner, J. Using advanced manufacturing to produce unmanned aerial vehicles: a feasibility study. In: Ground/air multisensor interoperability, integration, and networking for persistent ISR IV. Bellingham: SPIE; 2013, 8742:20–35 pp.10.1117/12.2027616 ↗
19. Ince, JC, Peerzada, M, Mathews, LD, Pai, AR, Al-Qatatsheh, A, Abbasi, S, et al.. Overview of emerging hybrid and composite materials for space applications. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 2023;6:130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-023-00678-5.10.1007/s42114-023-00678-5 ↗
20. Parveez, B, Kittur, MI, Badruddin, IA, Kamangar, S, Hussien, M, Umarfarooq, MA. Scientific advancements in composite materials for aircraft applications: a review. Polymers 2022;14:5007. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14225007.10.3390/polym14225007 ↗
21. Karataş, MA, Gökkaya, H. A review on machinability of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) and glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) composite materials. Def Technol 2018;14:318–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2018.02.001.10.1016/j.dt.2018.02.001 ↗
22. Dickson, AN, Barry, JN, McDonnell, KA, Dowling, DP. Fabrication of continuous carbon, glass and Kevlar fibre reinforced polymer composites using additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 2017;16:146–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.06.004.10.1016/j.addma.2017.06.004 ↗
23. Dong, S, Xie, S, Zhou, P, Li, C, Xian, G. The experimental status of the impact performance of carbon-and glass-fiber reinforced thermoplastic polymer composites. In: Structures. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2025, 76:108997.10.1016/j.istruc.2025.108997 ↗
24. Thakur, RK, Singh, KK. Influence of fillers on polymeric composite during conventional machining processes: a review. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 2021;43:94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-02813-z.10.1007/s40430-021-02813-z ↗
25. Vigneshwaran, S, Uthayakumar, M, Arumugaprabu, V. A review on erosion studies of fiber-reinforced polymer composites. J Reinforc Plast Compos 2017;36:1019–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684417699711.10.1177/0731684417699711 ↗
26. Borowski, E, Soliman, E, Kandil, UF, Reda, TM. Interlaminar fracture toughness of CFRP laminates incorporating multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Polymers 2015;7:1020–45. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym7061020.10.3390/polym7061020 ↗
27. Ojha, S, Raghavendra, G, Acharya, SK. A comparative investigation of bio waste filler (wood apple‐coconut) reinforced polymer composites. Polym Compos 2014;35:180–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.22648.10.1002/pc.22648 ↗
28. Lingaraju, D, Ramji, K, Rao, NM, lakshmi, UR. Characterization and prediction of some engineering properties of polymer-Clay/Silica hybrid nanocomposites through ANN and regression models. Procedia Eng 2011;10:9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.004.10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.004 ↗
29. Khan, D, Ali, Z, Asif, D, Panjwani, MK, Khan, I. Incorporation of carbon nanotubes in photoactive layer of organic solar cells. Ain Shams Eng J 2021;12:897–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.06.002.10.1016/j.asej.2020.06.002 ↗
30. Zhang, J, Zhang, X. Interfacial bonding characteristics of multi-walled carbon nanotube/ultralight foamed concrete. Sci Eng Compos Mater 2024;31:20240028. https://doi.org/10.1515/secm-2024-0028.10.1515/secm-2024-0028 ↗
31. Naim, AF, AlFannakh, H, Arafat, S, Ibrahim, SS. Characterization of PVC/MWCNTs nanocomposite: solvent blend. Sci Eng Compos Mater 2020;27:55–64. https://doi.org/10.1515/secm-2020-0003.10.1515/secm-2020-0003 ↗
32. Qiaoli, ZH, Yuliang, HO, Weihan, WA, Yutong, LI, Cheng, LI. Experimental and numerical investigation of mechanical behavior of plain woven CFRP composites subjected to three-point bending. Chin J Aeronaut 2023;36:505–17.10.1016/j.cja.2023.04.028 ↗
33. Wang, A, Li, R, Liu, X. Analysis of the tensile properties and probabilistic characteristics of large-tow carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Polymers 2024;16:2197. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16152197.10.3390/polym16152197 ↗
34. Fu, SY, Li, SH, Li, SX, He, GH, Zhou, BL. Theoretical study of the stress transfer in single-fibre composites. Part II. Partially debonded fibre-matrix interface. Sci Eng Compos Mater 1994;3:145–52. https://doi.org/10.1515/SECM.1994.3.3.145.10.1515/SECM.1994.3.3.145 ↗
35. Mallampati, SC, Komal, UK, Rakesh, P, Barman, P. Investigation of the mechanical response of MWCNTs infused carbon/glass fiber-based hybrid composites using digital image correlation. Constr Build Mater 2025;492:143068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.143068 ↗
36. Fernández, C, Medina, C, Pincheira, G, Canales, C, Flores, P. The effect of multiwall carbon nanotubes on the in-plane shear behavior of epoxy glass fiber reinforced composites. Compos B Eng 2013;55:421–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.07.010.10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.07.010 ↗
37. Cheng, C, Zhang, C, Zhou, J, Jiang, M, Sun, Z, Zhou, S, et al.. Improving the interlaminar toughness of the carbon fiber/epoxy composites via interleaved with polyethersulfone porous films. Compos Sci Technol 2019;183:107827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107827.10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107827 ↗
38. Fekiač, JJ, Krbata, M, Kohutiar, M, Janík, R, Kakošová, L, Breznická, A, et al.. Comprehensive review: optimization of epoxy composites, mechanical properties, & technological trends. Polymers 2025;17:271. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17030271.10.3390/polym17030271 ↗
39. Zhang, J, Zhang, Z, Huang, R, Tan, L. Advances in toughening modification methods for epoxy resins: a comprehensive review. Polymers 2025;17:1288. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17091288.10.3390/polym17091288 ↗
40. Hosseini, A, Raji, A. Improved double impact and flexural performance of hybridized glass basalt fiber reinforced composite with graphene nanofiller for lighter aerostructures. Polym Test 2023;125:108107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2023.108107.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2023.108107 ↗
41. Khajuria, A, Bedi, R, Singh, B, Akhtar, M. EDM machinability and parametric optimisation of 2014Al/Al2O3 composite by RSM. Int J Mach Mach Mater 2018;20:536–55. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMMM.2018.096380.10.1504/IJMMM.2018.096380 ↗
42. Akhtar, M, Khajuria, A. Probing true microstructure-hardening relationship in simulated heat affected zone of P91B steels. Metallogr Microstruct Anal 2019;8:656–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13632-019-00573-w.10.1007/s13632-019-00573-w ↗
43. Akhtar, M, Khajuria, A, Sahu, JK, Swaminathan, J, Kumar, R, Bedi, R, et al.. Phase transformations and numerical modelling in simulated HAZ of nanostructured P91B steel for high temperature applications. Appl Nanosci 2018;8:1669–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.08.029.10.1007/s13204-018-0854-1 ↗
44. Khajuria, A, Akhtar, M, Pandey, MK, Singh, MP, Raina, A, Bedi, R, et al.. Influence of ceramic Al2O3 particulates on performance measures and surface characteristics during sinker EDM of stir cast AMMCs. World J Eng 2019;16:526–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/wje-01-2019-0015.10.1108/WJE-01-2019-0015 ↗
45. Akhtar, M, Khajuria, A, Kumar, VS, Gupta, RK, Albert, SK. Evolution of microstructure during welding simulation of boron modified P91 steel. Phys Met Metallogr 2019;120:672–85. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0031918x19070056.10.1134/S0031918X19070056 ↗
46. Huang, X. Fabrication and properties of carbon fibers. Materials 2009;2:2369–403. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma2042369.10.3390/ma2042369 ↗
47. Guin, JP, Gueguen, Y. Mechanical properties of glass. In: Springer handbook of glass 2019. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019:227–71 pp.10.1007/978-3-319-93728-1_7 ↗
48. Nie, X, Bahrami, A. Effect of carbon nanotubes on mechanical properties of aluminum matrix composites: a review. Sci Eng Compos Mater 2024;31:20240009. https://doi.org/10.1515/secm-2024-0009.10.1515/secm-2024-0009 ↗
49. Rashko, MN, Hamad, SM, Barzinjy, AA, Hamad, AH. Mechanical properties of carbon nanotubes (CNTs): a review. Eurasian J Sci Eng 2022;8:54–68. https://doi.org/10.23918/eajse.v8i2p54.10.23918/eajse.v8i2p54 ↗
50. Barzinjy, AA. Mechanical properties of carbon nanotubes (CNTs): a review. Eurasian J Sci Eng 2022;8.10.23918/eajse.v8i2p54 ↗
51. Larco, C, Pahonie, R, Edu, I. The effects of fibre volume fraction on a glass-epoxy composite material. INCAS Bul 2015;7:113.10.13111/2066-8201.2015.7.3.10 ↗
52. Grund, D, Orlishausen, M, Taha, I. Determination of fiber volume fraction of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer using thermogravimetric methods. Polym Test 2019;75:358–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.02.031.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.02.031 ↗