journal article·2025-02-22Open access

Antibody-functionalized nanoporous silicon particles as a selective doxorubicin vehicle to improve toxicity against HER2+ breast cancer cells

Alma Rosa Oaxaca Camacho, Sara Elisa Herrera Rodríguez, Óscar René Ochoa Mojica, Vivechana Agarwal, Alexis Jazmín Preciado Pelayo, Gregorio Guadalupe Carbajal Arízaga, Ángel H. Álvarez, Zaira Yunuen García Carvajal, Moisés Martínez Velázquez, Rodolfo Hernández Gutiérrez

Abstract

Abstract Porous silicon (PS) has been widely used in biology, biomedicine, and nanotechnology. In recent years, its application in cancer therapy has received considerable attention. PS has shown low cytotoxicity, so it is reasonable to use it as an antibody conjugate for targeted anticancer drug delivery. In this work, we synthesized PS covalently attached to doxorubicin and covered by a nanometric polymer as a crosslinker between PS and the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab, using electrochemical etching for particle generation. The results revealed the formation of the antibody conjugate, obtaining particles with sizes around 250–350 nm, and a homogeneous size distribution determined by dynamic light scattering. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses showed the porous structure of the conjugate, while Fourier-transform infrared and transmission electron microscopy characterization demonstrated functionalization between PS and the antibody. The cytotoxic effect was evaluated against two breast cancer cell lines, SKBR3 (HER2+) and MCF-7 (HER2−), and one non-cancer cell line as control (HEK293). The cytotoxic effect on the SKBR3 cancer cell line was higher than on the MCF-7 and HEK293 cell lines. Notably, the targeted protein HER2 mediates the elevated cytotoxic activity exhibited by the antibody conjugate.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Anodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures · Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques · Silicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Unidad de Biotecnología Médica y Farmacéutica. Centro de Investigación y Asistencia en Tecnología y Diseño del Estado de Jalisco A.C. , Av. Normalistas 800, Col. Colinas de la Normal , Guadalajara , Jalisco, C.P. 44270 , Mexico

Unidad Sureste. Centro de Investigación y Asistencia en Tecnología y Diseño del Estado de Jalisco , A.C., km 5.5 Carretera Sierra Papacal-Chuburná , Chuburná, Mérida , Yucatán, C.P. 97302 , Mexico

Centro de Investigación en Ingeniería y Ciencias Aplicadas. Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos , Cuernavaca, Morelos , C.P. 62900 , Mexico

Centro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierías . Universidad de Guadalajara . Guadalajara , Jalisco, C.P. 44430 , Mexico

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Blazkova I, Vaculovicova M, Eckschlager T, Stiborova M, Trnkova L, Adam V, et al. Study of fluorescence of doxorubicin in muscle tissue using highly sensitive fluorescence sensing. Chem Sens. 2014;4:9.
2. International Agency for Research on Cancer, W. H. O. Cancer Today. http://gco.iarc.fr/today/home (accessed 27/jun/2024).
3. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49.10.3322/caac.21660 ↗
4. Li C. Poly(L-glutamic acid)–anticancer drug conjugates. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2002;54:695–713.10.1016/S0169-409X(02)00045-5 ↗
5. Toporkiewicz M, Meissner J, Matusewicz L, Czogalla A, Sikorski AF. Toward a magic or imaginary bullet? Ligands for drug targeting to cancer cells: Principles, hopes, and challenges. Int J Nanomed. 2015;10:1399–414.10.2147/IJN.S74514 ↗
6. Sadat SMA, Saeidnia S, Nazarali AJ, Haddadi A. Nano-pharmaceutical formulations for targeted drug delivery against HER2 in breast cancer. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2015;15:71–86.10.2174/1568009615666150105115047 ↗
7. Nie S, Xing Y, Kim GJ, Simons JW. Nanotechnology applications in cancer. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2007;9:257–88.10.1146/annurev.bioeng.9.060906.152025 ↗
8. Smaglo BG, Aldeghaither D, Weiner LM. The development of immunoconjugates for targeted cancer therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014;11:637–48.10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.159 ↗
9. Li Z, Tan S, Li S, Shen Q, Wang K. Cancer drug delivery in the nano era: An overview and perspectives (Review). Oncol Rep. 2017;38:611–24.10.3892/or.2017.5718 ↗
10. Pincus SH, Song K, Maresh GA, Hamer DH, Dimitrov DS, Chen W, et al. Identification of human anti-HIV gp160 monoclonal antibodies that make effective immunotoxins. J Virol. 2017;91:e01955-16.10.1128/JVI.01955-16 ↗
11. Lemaire V. Structural modeling of drug release from biodegradable porous matrices based on a combined diffusion/erosion process. Int J Pharm. 2003;258:95–107.10.1016/S0378-5173(03)00165-0 ↗
12. Chiappini C, Liu X, Fakhoury JR, Ferrari M. Biodegradable porous silicon barcode nanowires with defined geometry. Adv Funct Mater. 2010;20:2231–9.10.1002/adfm.201000360 ↗
13. Yeh YT, Xia Y, Yu X, Zheng SY. Nanomaterial integrated microfluidic devices for virus analysis. In 2015 IEEE SENSORS - Proceedings [7370496] (2015 IEEE SENSORS - Proceedings). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. 10.1109/ICSENS.2015.7370496.
14. Korhonen E, Ronkko S, Hillebrand S, Riikonen J, Xu W, Jarvinen K, et al. Cytotoxicity assessment of porous silicon microparticles for ocular drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2016;100:1–8.10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.11.020 ↗
15. Santos HA, Riikonen J, Salonen J, Makila E, Heikkila T, Laaksonen T, et al. In vitro cytotoxicity of porous silicon microparticles: Effect of the particle concentration, surface chemistry and size. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:2721–31.10.1016/j.actbio.2009.12.043 ↗
16. Tolli MA, Ferreira MP, Kinnunen SM, Rysa J, Makila EM, Szabo Z, et al. In vivo biocompatibility of porous silicon biomaterials for drug delivery to the heart. Biomaterials. 2014;35:8394–405.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.05.078 ↗
17. Low SP, Voelcker NH, Canham LT, Williams KA. The biocompatibility of porous silicon in tissues of the eye. Biomaterials. 2009;30:2873–80.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.02.008 ↗
18. Salih EY, Bashir MBA, Rajpar AH, Badruddin IA. Fabrication and characterization of porous Si/CuO film for visible light MSM photodetector: The effect of post-processing temperature. Ceram Int. 2022;48:9965–72.10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.12.203 ↗
19. Hou H, Nieto A, Ma F, Freeman WR, Sailor MJ, Cheng L. Tunable sustained intravitreal drug delivery system for daunorubicin using oxidized porous silicon. J Control Rel. 2014;178:46–54.10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.01.003 ↗
20. Anglin EJ, Cheng L, Freeman WR, Sailor MJ. Porous silicon in drug delivery devices and materials. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60:1266–77.10.1016/j.addr.2008.03.017 ↗
21. Farzan M, Roth R, Schoelkopf J, Huwyler J, Puchkov M. The processes behind drug loading and release in porous drug delivery systems. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2023;189:133–51.10.1016/j.ejpb.2023.05.019 ↗
22. Zilony N, Rosenberg M, Holtzman L, Schori H, Shefi O, Segal E. Prolonged controlled delivery of nerve growth factor using porous silicon nanostructures. J Control Rel. 2017;257:51–9.10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.12.008 ↗
23. Vaccari L, Canton D, Zaffaroni N, Villa R, Tormen M, di Fabrizio E. Porous silicon as drug carrier for controlled delivery of doxorubicin anticancer agent. Microelectron Eng. 2006;83:1598–601.10.1016/j.mee.2006.01.113 ↗
24. Tabasi O, Falamaki C, Khalaj Z. Functionalized mesoporous silicon for targeted-drug-delivery. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2012;98:18–25.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.04.018 ↗
25. Jarvis KL, Barnes TJ, Prestidge CA. Surface chemistry of porous silicon and implications for drug encapsulation and delivery applications. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2012;175:25–38.10.1016/j.cis.2012.03.006 ↗
26. Meng L-X, Ren Q, Meng Q, Zheng Y-X, He M-L, Sun S-Y, et al. Trastuzumab modified silica nanoparticles loaded with doxorubicin for targeted and synergic therapy of breast cancer. Artif Cell Nanomed Biotechnol. 2018;46:556–63.10.1080/21691401.2018.1501380 ↗
27. Briolay T, Petithomme T, Fouet M, Nguyen-Pham N, Blanquart C, Boisgerault N. Delivery of cancer therapies by synthetic and bio-inspired nanovectors. Mol Cancer. 2021;20:55.10.1186/s12943-021-01346-2 ↗
28. Juan A, Cimas FJ, Bravo I, Pandiella A, Ocaña A, Alonso-Moreno C. An overview of antibody conjugated polymeric nanoparticles for breast cancer therapy. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12:802.10.3390/pharmaceutics12090802 ↗
29. You Y, Xu Z, Chen Y. Doxorubicin conjugated with a trastuzumab epitope and an MMP-2 sensitive peptide linker for the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer. Drug Deliv. 2018;25:448–60.10.1080/10717544.2018.1435746 ↗
30. Huang HS, Hainfeld JF. Intravenous magnetic nanoparticle cancer hyperthermia. Int J Nanomed. 2013;8:2521–32.10.2147/IJN.S43770 ↗
31. Lee-Hoeflich ST, Crocker L, Yao E, Pham T, Munroe X, Hoeflich KP, et al. A central role for HER3 in HER2-amplified breast cancer: Implications for targeted therapy. Cancer Res. 2008;68:5878–87.10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0380 ↗
32. Pao W, Miller VA. Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations, small-molecule kinase inhibitors, and non-small-cell lung cancer: Current knowledge and future directions. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2556–68.10.1200/JCO.2005.07.799 ↗
33. Miranda Jr EO, Silva VHR, Leão MA, Cabral-Albuquerque ECM, Cunha S, Fialho RL. Mechanochemical production of urea-citric acid copolymer. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2020;958:012008.10.1088/1757-899X/958/1/012008 ↗
34. Strauss V, Wang H, Delacroix S, Ledendecker M, Wessig P. Carbon nanodots revised: the thermal citric acid/urea reaction. Chem Sci. 2020;11:8256–66.10.1039/D0SC01605E ↗
35. Sweeney S, Grandolfo D, Ruenraroengsak P, Tetley TD. Functional consequences for primary human alveolar macrophages following treatment with long, but not short, multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Int J Nanomed. 2015;10:3115–29.10.2147/IJN.S77867 ↗
36. Danhier F, Feron O, Préat V. To exploit the tumor microenvironment: passive and active tumor targeting of nanocarriers for anti-cancer drug delivery. J Control Rel. 2010;148:135–46.10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.08.027 ↗
37. Das G, Nicastri A, Coluccio ML, Gentile F, Candeloro P, Cojoc G, et al. FT-IR, Raman, RRS measurements and DFT calculation for doxorubicin. Microsc Res Tech. 2010;73:991–5.10.1002/jemt.20849 ↗
38. Chen L, Xue Y, Xia X, Song M, Huang J, Zhang H, et al. A redox stimuli-responsive superparamagnetic nanogel with chemically anchored DOX for enhanced anticancer efficacy and low systemic adverse effects. J Mater Chem B. 2015;3:8949–62.10.1039/C5TB01851J ↗
39. Li J-M, Zhang W, Su H, Wang Y-Y, Tan C-P, Ji L-N, et al. Reversal of multidrug resistance in MCF-7/Adr cells by codelivery of doxorubicin and BCL2 siRNA using a folic acid-conjugated polyethylenimine hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin nanocarrier. Int J Nanomed. 2015;10:3147–62.10.2147/IJN.S67146 ↗
40. Piryatinski YP, Dolgov LA, Yaroshchuk OV, Gavrilko TA, Lazarouk SK. Enhancement of fluorescence of porous silicon upon saturation by liquid crystal. Opt Spectrosc. 2010;108:70–9.10.1134/S0030400X1001011X ↗
41. Gajbhiye KR, Gajbhiye JM. EPR effect based nanocarriers targeting for treatment of cancer. Int J Drug Deliv. 2016;8:117–24.10.5138/09750215.1974 ↗
42. Nakamura Y, Mochida A, Choyke PL, Kobayashi H. Nanodrug delivery: Is the enhanced permeability and retention effect sufficient for curing cancer? Bioconjug Chem. 2016;27:2225–38.10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.6b00437 ↗
43. De Angelis F, Pujia A, Falcone C, Iaccino E, Palmieri C, Liberale C, et al. Water soluble nanoporous nanoparticle for in vivo targeted drug delivery and controlled release in B cells tumor context. Nanoscale. 2010;2:2230–6.10.1039/c0nr00161a ↗
44. Ogi T, Aishima K, Permatasari FA, Iskandar F, Tanabe E, Okuyama K. Kinetics of nitrogen-doped carbon dot formation via hydrothermal synthesis. N J Chem. 2016;40:5555–61.10.1039/C6NJ00009F ↗
45. Factorovich M, Guz L, Candal R. N-TiO2: chemical synthesis and photocatalysis. Adv Phys Chem. 2011;2011:1–8.10.1155/2011/821204 ↗
46. Lin S-S, Chen I-C, Yang J, Hsueh TJ, Hsu C-L, Lee H-E, et al. A study on one-step immobilization of horse immunoglobulin with vertically grown ZnO nanorods substrates. J Electrochem Soc. 2011;158:K107–11.10.1149/1.3559465 ↗
47. Molinaro R, Martinez JO, Zinger A, De Vita A, Storci G, Arrighetti N, et al. Leukocyte-mimicking nanovesicles for effective doxorubicin delivery to treat breast cancer and melanoma. Biomater Sci. 2020;8:333–41.10.1039/C9BM01766F ↗
48. De Vita A, Liverani C, Molinaro R, Martinez JO, Hartman KA, Spadazzi C, et al. Lysyl oxidase engineered lipid nanovesicles for the treatment of triple negative breast cancer. Sci Rep. 2021;11:5107.10.1038/s41598-021-84492-3 ↗
49. Zou T, Lan M, Liu F, Li L, Cai T, Tian H, et al. Emodin-loaded polymer-lipid hybrid nanoparticles enhance the sensitivity of breast cancer to doxorubicin by inhibiting epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Cancer Nanotechnol. 2021;12:22.10.1186/s12645-021-00093-9 ↗