journal article·2015-07-01Open access

Influence of skin wrinkles and resin insertions in maximum stress of transitions of pure bending sandwich beams

Daniel Fernández Caballero, Víctor Rodríguez de la Cruz, J. Manuel Munoz-Guijosa, Sudhakar Nair

Abstract

Abstract The sandwich beam has emerged as a part of new engineering applications in recent years. Dimensional and mechanical control tests are used to avoid possible service failures. Sandwich beams are modeled as large deflection pure bending beams with monolithic ends. The manufacturing process of sandwich beams can lead to different dimensional and shape defects such as wrinkles in traction and compression skins, insertions of epoxy resin in foam core or in the skins, shape defects of the foam, etc. In order to study the maximum stress behavior of beams with different types of defects, a specific finite element model (FEM) has been developed. Finally, the results of FEM analysis are validated using experimental tests. The implications of these findings on the structural integrity of glass-fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP)-foam sandwich composites are discussed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Analysis of Composite Materials · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Mechanical Engineering and Manufacturing Department, E.T.S.I. Industriales, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, C/José Gutiérrez Abascal, no 2. 28006 Madrid, Spain

Illinois Institute of Technology, Mechanical Materials and Aerospace Engineering Department, 10 W 32nd Street, Engineering 1 Building, Chicago, IL 60616, USA

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. Hayman B. J. Sandw. Struct. Mater. 2006.
2. Hayman B, Bergreen C, Pettersson, R. J. Sandw. Struct. Mater. 2007, 9, 377–404.10.1177/1099636207069250 ↗
3. Just-Agosto F, Shafia B, Serrano D. J. Sandw. Struct. Mater. 2007, 9, 343–363.10.1177/1099636207067241 ↗
4. Theotokoglou EE, Hortis D, Carlsson LA, Mahfuz H. J. Sandw. Struct. Mater. 2008, 10, 75.10.1177/1099636207084643 ↗
5. Quintana-Alonso I, Fleck NA. J. Sandw. Struct. Mater. 2010, 12, 139–158.10.1177/1099636209104535 ↗
6. Thomson RS, Shah Khan MZ, Mouritz AP. Compos. Struct. 1998, 42, 107–118.10.1016/S0263-8223(98)00058-0 ↗
7. Mouritz AP, Thomson RS. Compos. Struct. 1999, 44, 263–278.10.1016/S0263-8223(98)00133-0 ↗
8. Russo A, Zuccarello, B. Compos. Struct. 2007, 81, 575–586.10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.10.007 ↗
9. Leong M, Overgaard LCT, Thomsen OT, Lund E, Daniel IM. Compos. Struct. 2012, 94, 768–778.10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.09.012 ↗
10. Muñoz Guijosa JM, Caballero DF, Rodríguez de la Cruz V, Muñoz Sanz JL, Echávarri. General. Spiral Spring Mod.,Mech. Mach. Theory 2012, 51, 110–130.10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2011.12.00710.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2011.12.007 ↗
11. Fernández Caballero D, Rodríguez de la Cruz V, and others. Analysis and design of ends in multicomponent sandwich panels. Mechanics of Nano, Micro and Macro Composite Structures Politecnico di Torino, 2012, pp. 18–20.
12. Muñoz Guijosa and others. Exp. Mech. 2011, 52, 679–692.10.1007/s11340-011-9535-7 ↗
13. Ortíz Berrocal L. Resistencia de Materiales, Mc Graw Hill: Madrid, 2007. ISBN: 9788448156336.
14. Zineb T, Sedrakian A, Billoet JL. Compos. Part B-Eng. 2003, 34, 447–458.10.1016/S1359-8368(03)00017-9 ↗
15. Hill RG. Pure bending test machine. US patent No 3026720, 1959.
16. Sokolonsky V, Shen H, Vaikhanski L, Nutt SR. Compos. Struct. 2003, 60, 219–229.10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00293-3 ↗
17. Muñoz Guijosa JM, Rodriguez de la Cruz V, Fernández Caballero D. Análisis de modos de fallo en vigas sandwich sometidas a flexión pura y grandes deflexiones. XIX Congreso Nacional de Ingeniería Mecánica, Castellón de la Plana, 2012.