Free vibration and postbuckling of laminated composite Timoshenko beams
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract A numerical solution method was developed to investigate the postbuckling behavior and vibrations around the buckled configurations of symmetrically and unsymmetrically laminated composite Timoshenko beams subject to different boundary conditions. The Hamilton principle was employed to derive the governing equations and corresponding boundary conditions which are then discretized by introducing a set of matrix differential operators. The pseudo-arc-length continuation method was used to solve the postbuckling problem. To study the free vibration that takes place around the buckled configurations, the corresponding eigenvalue problem was solved by means of the postbuckling configuration modes obtained in the previous step. The static bifurcation diagrams for composite beams with different lay-up laminates are given, and it is shown that the lay-up configuration considerably affects the magnitude of critical buckling load and postbuckling behavior. The study of the vibrations of composite beams with different laminations around the buckled configurations indicates that the natural frequency in the prebuckling domain increases as the stiffness of a beam increases, while there is no specific relation between the lay-up lamination and natural frequency in the postbuckling domain which necessitates conducting an accurate analysis in this area.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Vibration and Dynamic Analysis · Structural Analysis and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Guilan, PO Box 41635-3756, Rasht 3756, Iran
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhang Z, Taheri F. Composites: Part B 2003, 34, 391–398.10.1016/S1359-8368(02)00134-810.1016/S1359-8368(02)00134-8 ↗
2. Ozturk H, Sabuncu M. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2005, 65, 1982–1995.10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.03.00410.1016/j.compscitech.2005.03.004 ↗
3. Aydogdu M. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2007, 67, 1096–1104.10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.05.02110.1016/j.compscitech.2006.05.021 ↗
4. Sapountzakis EJ, Tsiatas GC. Eng. Struct. 2007, 29, 675–681.10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.06.01010.1016/j.engstruct.2006.06.010 ↗
5. Gupta RK, Gunda JB, Janardhan GR, Rao GV. Compos. Struct. 2010, 92, 1947–1956.10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.12.01010.1016/j.compstruct.2009.12.010 ↗
6. Baghani M, Jafari-Talookolaei RA, Salarieh H. Appl. Math. Model. 2011, 35, 130–138.10.1016/j.apm.2010.05.01210.1016/j.apm.2010.05.012 ↗
7. Emam SA. Compos. Struct. 2011, 94, 24–30.10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.07.02410.1016/j.compstruct.2011.07.024 ↗
8. Vosoughi AR, Malekzadeh P, Banan Ma R, Banan Mo R. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 2012, 47, 96–102.10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2011.11.00910.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2011.11.009 ↗
9. Vo TP, Thai HT. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2012, 62, 67–76.10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2012.06.00110.1016/j.ijmecsci.2012.06.001 ↗
10. Ghayesh MH, Amabili M. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2013, 68, 76–91.10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.01.00110.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.01.001 ↗
11. Kisa M. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2004, 64, 1391–1402.10.1016/j.compscitech.2003.11.00210.1016/j.compscitech.2003.11.002 ↗
12. Shu D, Della CN. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2004, 46, 509–526.10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.05.00810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.05.008 ↗
13. Dong XJ, Meng G, Li HG, Ye L. Mech. Res. Commun. 2005, 32, 572–581.10.1016/j.mechrescom.2005.02.01410.1016/j.mechrescom.2005.02.014 ↗
14. Çalım FF. Compos. Struct. 2009, 88, 413–423.10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.05.00110.1016/j.compstruct.2008.05.001 ↗
15. Arvin H, Sadighi M, Ohadi AR. Compos. Struct. 2010, 92, 996–1008.10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.09.04710.1016/j.compstruct.2009.09.047 ↗
16. Ghayesh MH, Yourdkhani M, Balar S, Reid T. Appl. Math. Comput. 2010, 217, 545–556.10.1016/j.amc.2010.05.08810.1016/j.amc.2010.05.088 ↗
17. Kim JS, Wang KW. ASME J. Vib. Acoust. 2010, 132, 041003.
18. Gunda JB, Gupta RK, Janardhan GR, Rao GV. Compos. Struct. 2011, 93, 870–879.10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.07.00610.1016/j.compstruct.2010.07.006 ↗
19. Ghayesh MH. Acta Mech. Solida Sinica 2011, 24, 373–382.10.1016/S0894-9166(11)60038-410.1016/S0894-9166(11)60038-4 ↗
20. Jafari-Talookolaei RA, Abedi M, Kargarnovin MH, Ahmadian MT. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2012, 65, 97–104.10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2012.09.00710.1016/j.ijmecsci.2012.09.007 ↗
21. Nayfeh AH, Emam SA. Nonlinear Dyn. 2008, 54, 395–408.10.1007/s11071-008-9338-210.1007/s11071-008-9338-2 ↗
22. Emam SA, Nayfeh AH. Compos. Struct. 2009, 88, 636–642.10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.06.00610.1016/j.compstruct.2008.06.006 ↗
23. Ghayesh MH, Amabili M. Comput. Struct. 2012, 112–113, 406–421.10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.09.00510.1016/j.compstruc.2012.09.005 ↗
24. Ke LL, Yang J, Kitipornchai S. Meccanica 2010, 45, 743–752.10.1007/s11012-009-9276-110.1007/s11012-009-9276-1 ↗
25. Shu C. Differential Quadrature and Its Application in Engineering. Springer: London, 2000.10.1007/978-1-4471-0407-010.1007/978-1-4471-0407-0 ↗
26. Keller HB. In Proc. Advanced Sem., University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 1976, Academic Press: New York, pp. 359–384.