Application of the VIM to thermal buckling of composite beams on an elastic foundation
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In this paper, thermal buckling analysis of composite laminated beams resting on a two-parameter elastic foundation is carried out by means of the variational iteration method (VIM). The solution procedure is based on the first-order shear deformation beam theory of Timoshenko combined with the von Karman type of geometrical non-linearity. Both edges of the beam are assumed to be axially restrained while may possess various out-of-plane boundary conditions. The elastic foundation is modelled via the two-parameter Pasternak medium which takes into account the vertical interaction of the elements. The governing equilibrium equations are obtained by means of the virtual displacement principle. Stability equations are then obtained by means of the adjacent equilibrium criterion. These equations are uncoupled to extract individual equations in terms of lateral displacement. The resulted differential equations are solved via the VIM. The study examines the VIM in obtaining the closed-form analytical solutions for thermal buckling of composite laminated beams. Furthermore, it is shown that for some special materials with negative thermal expansion coefficient, buckling may occur under cooling rather than heating or it may not occur at all.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Mechanical Engineering Department, Islamic Azad University South Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
Mechanical Engineering Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Boley BA, Weiner JH. Theory of Thermal Stresses. John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1965.
2. Hetnarski RB, Eslami MR. Thermal Stresses, Advanced Theory and Applications. Springer: The Netherlands, 2009.
3. Reddy JN, Khdeir AA. J. Ther. Stress. 1999, 22, 331–346.10.1080/014957399280904 ↗
4. Tylikowski A, Hetnarski RB. J. Appl. Mech. 1996, 63, 884–890.10.1115/1.2787243 ↗
5. Mannini A. Comput. Struct. 1997, 39, 1–10.10.1016/S0263-8223(96)00056-6 ↗
6. Khdeir AA. Acta Mechanica 2001, 149, 201–213.10.1007/BF0126167210.1007/BF01261672 ↗
7. Aydogdu M. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2007, 67, 1096–1104.10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.05.021 ↗
8. Abramovich H. Compos. Struct. 1994, 28, 201–213.10.1016/0263-8223(94)90049-3 ↗
9. Yazdani S, Kiani Y, Jabbari M, Eslami MR. ISRM Mech. Eng. 2011, 2011, 362030.10.5402/2011/362030 ↗
10. Kiani Y, Taheri S, Eslami MR. J. Therm. Stress. 2011, 34, 835–850.10.1080/01495739.2011.586272 ↗
11. Kiani Y, Rezaei M, Taheri S, Eslami MR. Int. J. Mech. Mater. Des. 2011, 7, 185–197.10.1007/s10999-011-9158-2 ↗
12. Vosoughi AR, Malekzadeh P, Banan Ma R, Banan Mo R. Int. J. Non-Lin. Mech. 2012, 47, 96–102.10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2011.11.009 ↗
13. Coskun SB, Atay MT. Comput. Math. Appl. 2009, 58, 2060–2066.
14. Atay MT, Coskun SB. Comput. Math. Appl. 2009, 58, 2528–2534.10.1016/j.camwa.2009.03.051 ↗
15. Reddy JN. Mechanics of Laminated Composite Plates and Shells, Theory and Application, 2nd ed. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2003.10.1201/b1240910.1201/b12409 ↗
16. Jones RM. Composites: Part A 2005, 36, 1355–1367.10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.01.02810.1016/j.compositesa.2005.01.028 ↗