journal article·2025-12-12

Tandem Nonoxidative Coupling of Methane and Carbon Dioxide Reduction via Pulsed Joule Thermochemistry

Yeonsu Kwak, Rucha Railkar, Weiqing Zheng, Dionisios G. Vlachos

ACS Energy Letters· Volume 10· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

The conversion of CH 4 into higher hydrocarbons and CO 2 reduction are promising yet hindered by poor selectivity and the cost of green H 2 . Methane can act as an intrinsic H 2 donor for CO 2 reduction, but its activation typically leads to dry reforming to syngas at high temperatures. Here, we demonstrate that rapid pulsed Joule heating (RPH) of CH 4 /CO 2 mixtures enables the direct nonoxidative coupling of methane to C 2 hydrocarbons (acetylene and ethylene) while simultaneously reducing CO 2 via the reverse water-gas shift reaction. Compared to continuous Joule heating, RPH achieves higher CH 4 conversion at lower average temperatures, requires 60% less power, and enhances carbon element stability by suppressing the reverse Boudouard reaction. Kinetic modeling reveals that RPH’s microsecond pulses favor C–C coupling over reforming and aromatization due to time scale separation. This strategy can also convert biogas directly into intermediates for C 3+ oxygenates, bypassing the energy-intensive dry reforming process.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Catalysts for Methane Reforming · Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions · Plasma Applications and Diagnostics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Delaware, 150 Academy St., Newark, Delaware 19716, United States

Delaware Energy Institute, 221 Academy St., Newark, Delaware 19716, United States

Funding

Basic Energy Sciences · Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s00253-009-2246-710.1007/s00253-009-2246-7 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.seta.2023.10355710.1016/j.seta.2023.103557 ↗
3. 10.1038/s44286-025-00185-y10.1038/s44286-025-00185-y ↗
4. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.14871910.1016/j.cej.2024.148719 ↗
5. 10.1023/A:101909230876910.1023/A:1019092308769 ↗
6. 10.1039/D3EE03064D10.1039/D3EE03064D ↗
7. 10.1016/S1003-9953-2005-14-3-140-15010.1016/S1003-9953-2005-14-3-140-150 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0113910.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01139 ↗
9. 10.1038/s44286-025-00182-110.1038/s44286-025-00182-1 ↗
10. 10.1080/20430779.2015.100836210.1080/20430779.2015.1008362 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.energy.2010.10.03810.1016/j.energy.2010.10.038 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41586-022-05075-410.1038/s41586-022-05075-4 ↗
13. 10.1007/s10562-008-9789-610.1007/s10562-008-9789-6 ↗
14. 10.1021/cr400357r10.1021/cr400357r ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2015.04.03410.1016/j.compchemeng.2015.04.034 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.504291210.1063/1.5042912 ↗
17. Karidis A. · 2025
18. bAmerican Biogas Council. Investment in New U.S. Biogas Systems Grows by $3 Billion in 2024, a 40% Increase and New Record. Press Release, 2025. https://americanbiogascouncil.org/investment-in-new-u-s-biogas-systems-grows-by-3-billion-in-2024-a-40-increase-and-new-record/ (accessed Nov 5, 2025).
19. 10.1016/j.cep.2024.10987510.1016/j.cep.2024.109875 ↗
20. 10.1038/s44359-024-00002-410.1038/s44359-024-00002-4 ↗
21. 10.1002/adfm.20240396110.1002/adfm.202403961 ↗
22. 10.1002/adma.20220962110.1002/adma.202209621 ↗
23. 10.1038/s44286-024-00134-110.1038/s44286-024-00134-1 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41586-022-04568-610.1038/s41586-022-04568-6 ↗
25. 10.1038/s41557-024-01598-710.1038/s41557-024-01598-7 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41467-021-27878-110.1038/s41467-021-27878-1 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.15682110.1016/j.cej.2024.156821 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0052210.1021/acsenergylett.3c00522 ↗
29. 10.1021/ie00098a02510.1021/ie00098a025 ↗
30. 10.1039/D2RE00315E10.1039/D2RE00315E ↗
31. 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2022.11175310.1016/j.nucengdes.2022.111753 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.susc.2006.03.03210.1016/j.susc.2006.03.032 ↗
33. 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c0008810.1021/acs.jcim.3c00088 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.cpc.2019.10686410.1016/j.cpc.2019.106864 ↗
35. Smith, G. P. GRI (Gas Research Institute) Mech 3.0 ; http://combustion.berkeley.edu/gri-mech/version30/text30.html (accessed Oct 16, 2025).
36. 10.1016/j.softx.2020.10044210.1016/j.softx.2020.100442 ↗
37. 10.1016/0040-6031(87)88037-110.1016/0040-6031(87)88037-1 ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.iecr.3c0319810.1021/acs.iecr.3c03198 ↗
39. 10.1088/1757-899X/709/3/03309810.1088/1757-899X/709/3/033098 ↗
40. 10.1080/15325008.2014.97538610.1080/15325008.2014.975386 ↗
41. 10.3103/S106837121806009310.3103/S1068371218060093 ↗
42. 10.1021/om000242810.1021/om0002428 ↗
43. IEA
44. 10.1016/j.ceja.2022.10030910.1016/j.ceja.2022.100309 ↗
45. 10.3390/en1308197110.3390/en13081971 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14526010.1016/j.cej.2023.145260 ↗
47. 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c0167910.1021/acs.iecr.1c01679 ↗
48. 10.1081/SS-10010018310.1081/SS-100100183 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15719610.1016/j.jallcom.2020.157196 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.05710.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.057 ↗
51. 10.1016/S1570-7946(09)70020-310.1016/S1570-7946(09)70020-3 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.cep.2020.10817210.1016/j.cep.2020.108172 ↗
53. 10.3390/pr803027410.3390/pr8030274 ↗