Impact resistance capacity and degradation law of epoxy-coated steel strand under the impact load
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract As the main load-bearing component of the bridge structure, the cable is damaged by the impact from time to time, so it is very important to clarify its impact resistance capacity. Based on the method of the drop-weight test, this article mainly studies the degradation law of the mechanical properties of epoxy-coated steel strand (ECSS) under the impact load. Through the impact test of ECSS under different working conditions, the influence law of prestress, impact energy, initial defects and other factors on the impact resistance of the steel strand was revealed. Then, the difference of the impact resistance of ECSS and ordinary steel strand (OSS) was verified under the same impact conditions. Finally, the failure mechanism and the residual-bearing capacity of ECSS were analyzed through the secondary impact test. The results show that the initial prestress is helpful to improve its impact resistance when it is less than 0.11 {f}_{{\rm{u}}} , and exceeding this value will accelerate its failure process. The effect of impact height on the strain at the impact point of ECSS is significantly greater than that near the anchor end. ECSS has better energy absorption characteristics than OSS. The impact resistance of ECSS with initial defects is very sensitive to the impact energy. The influence on outer strand in the secondary impact is significantly higher than the central strand, and its residual tensile capacity still has 0.85 {f}_{{\rm{u}}} .
Source: crossref · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Concrete Corrosion and Durability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology , Zhenjiang , 212100 , China
Shandong Key Laboratory of Civil Engineering Disaster Prevention and Mitigation, College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Shandong University of Science and Technology , Qingdao , 266590 , China
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Wu J, Chen SR. Probabilistic dynamic behavior of a long-span bridge under extreme events. Eng Struct. 2011;33(5):1657–65.10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.02.002 ↗
2. Yeh F-Y, Chang K-C, Sung Y-C, Hung H-H, Chou C-C. A novel composite bridge for emergency disaster relief: Concept and verification. Compos Struct. 2015;127:199–210.10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.03.012 ↗
3. Hariharan K, Majidi O, Kim C, Lee MG, Barlat F. Stress relaxation and its effect on tensile deformation of steels. Mater Des (1980-2015). 2013;52:284–8.10.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.088 ↗
4. Feng B, Wang X, Wu Z. Fatigue life assessment of FRP cable for long-span cable-stayed bridge. Compos Struct. 2019;210:159–66.10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.039 ↗
5. Takena K, Miki C, Shimokawa H, Sakamoto K. Fatigue resistance of large-diameter cable for cable-stayed bridges. J Struct Eng. 1992;118(3):701–15.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:3(701) ↗
6. Mozos CM, Aparicio AC. Numerical and experimental study on the interaction cable structure during the failure of a stay in a cable stayed bridge. Eng Struct. 2011;33(8):2330–41.10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.04.006 ↗
7. Ghoreishi SR, Messager T, Cartraud P, Davies P. Validity and limitations of linear analytical models for steel wire strands under axial loading, using a 3D FE model. Int J Mech Sci. 2007;49(11):1251–61.10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2007.03.014 ↗
8. Deng L, Yu Y, Zou Q, Cai CS. State-of-the-art review of dynamic impact factors of highway bridges. J Bridge Eng. 2015;20(5):04014080.10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000672 ↗
9. Wang C, Wang H, Shankar K, Morozov EV, Hazell PJ. On the mechanical behaviour of steel wire mesh subjected to low-velocity impact. Thin-Walled Struct. 2021;159:107281.10.1016/j.tws.2020.107281 ↗
10. Quaresimin M, Ricotta M, Martello L, Mian S. Energy absorption in composite laminates under impact loading. Compos Part B: Eng. 2013;44(1):133–40.10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.06.020 ↗
11. Shishegaran A, Khalili MR, Karami B, Rabczuk T, Shishegaran A. Computational predictions for estimating the maximum deflection of reinforced concrete panels subjected to the blast load. Int J Impact Eng. 2020;139:103527.10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2020.103527 ↗
12. Nawrocki A, Labrosse M. A finite element model for simple straight wire rope strands. Comput Struct. 2000;77(4):345–59.10.1016/S0045-7949(00)00026-2 ↗
13. Saghafi H, Minak G, Zucchelli A. Effect of preload on the impact response of curved composite panels. Compos Part B Eng. 2014;60:74–81.10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.12.026 ↗
14. Judge R, Yang Z, Jones SW, Beattie G. Full 3D finite element modelling of spiral strand cables. Constr Build Mater. 2012;35:452–9.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.073 ↗
15. Ghelli D, Minak G. Low velocity impact and compression after impact tests on thin carbon/epoxy laminates. Compos Part B Eng. 2011;42(7):2067–79.10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.04.017 ↗
16. Bonneric M, Aubin V, Durville D. Fatigue damage mechanisms in steel cable under bending loading. Eng Fail Anal. 2019;106:104184.10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.104184 ↗
17. Xiang Y, Fang Z, Fang Y. Single and multiple impact behavior of CFRP cables under pretension. Constr Build Mater. 2017;140:521–33.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.112 ↗
18. Feng B, Wang X, Wu Z. Static and fatigue behavior of multi-tendon CFRP cables with integrated anchorages. J Compos Constr. 2019;23(6):04019051.10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000982 ↗
19. Atas C, Sayman O. An overall view on impact response of woven fabric composite plates. Compos Struct. 2008;82(3):336–45.10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.01.014 ↗
20. E8/E8M-16a, Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials, American Association State, USA, 2016.
21. Feng B, Wang X, Wu Z. Study on anchorage performance and installation parameters of large tonnage CFRP Cable. Eng Sci Technol. 2019;51(1):68–74.
22. Feraboli P, Kedward KT. A new composite structure impact performance assessment program. Compos Sci Technol. 2006;66(10):1336–47.10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.09.009 ↗