journal article·2016-11-01Open access

Effect of thermal exposure on the microstructure of the interface in a Gr f /Al composite

Pingping Wang, Guoqin Chen, Longtao Jiang, Daguang Li, Gaohui Wu

Abstract

Abstract The microstructure of the interface in a Gr f /Al composite after exposure at high temperature was investigated. The graphite fiber reinforced aluminum matrix composite was prepared by the pressure infiltration method. After being heat treated at 550°C, 600°C and 640°C for different times, the microstructure of the interface in the composite was studied by using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Furthermore, the content of Al 4 C 3 in the interface was examined using X-ray diffraction (XRD). The results showed that not only the micro morphology but also the content of Al 4 C 3 in the interface varied with the increase in temperature. When the composite was heat treated at 550°C and 600°C, Al 4 C 3 with a big length-to-diameter ratio was observed in the interface, while Al 4 C 3 with a small length-to-diameter ratio was found when the heat treatment temperature was 640°C. With the increase in the time, the content of Al 4 C 3 in the interface increased rapidly when the composite was heat treated at 640°C. Based on the dynamic calculation, the interface reaction diffusion rate constant of the Gr f /Al composite increases rapidly when the temperature is higher than 600°C.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Wang X, Chen GQ, Yang WS, Hussain M, Wang CC, Wu GH, Jiang DM. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2011, 528, 8212–8217.10.1016/j.msea.2011.07.039 ↗
2. Ruch PW, Beffort O, Kleiner S, Weber L, Uggowitzer PJ. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2006, 66, 2677–2685.10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.03.016 ↗
3. Etter T, Schulz P, Weber M, Metzc J, Wimmler M, Loffler JF, Uggowitzer PJ. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2007, 448, 1–6.10.1016/j.msea.2006.11.088 ↗
4. Lee M, Choi Y, Sugio K, Matsugi K, Sasaki G. Sci. Eng. Compos. Mater. 2011, 18, 167–171.10.1515/secm.2011.027 ↗
5. Yang M, Scott VD. Carbon 1991, 29, 877–879.10.1016/0008-6223(91)90162-C ↗
6. De Sanctis M, Pelleier S, Bienvenu Y, Guigon M. Carbon 1994, 32, 925–930.10.1016/0008-6223(94)90050-7 ↗
7. Pippel E, Woltersdorf J, Dokter M, Blucher J, Degischer HP. J. Mater. Sci. 2000, 35, 2279–2289.10.1023/A:1004787112162 ↗
8. Khan IH. Metall. Trans. A 1976, 7A, 1281–1289.10.1007/BF02658812 ↗
9. Li SH, Chao CG. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2004, 35A, 2153–2160.10.1007/s11661-004-0163-z ↗
10. Yang HN, Gu MY, Jiang WJ, Zhang GD. J. Mater. Sci. 1996, 31, 1903–1907.10.1007/BF00372206 ↗
11. Naybe-Hashemi H, Seyyedi J. Metall. Trans. A 1989, 20A, 727–739.10.1007/BF02667590 ↗
12. Hihara LH. Corr. Rev. 1997, 15, 361–386.10.1515/CORRREV.1997.15.3-4.361 ↗
13. Wang X, Jiang DM, Wu GH, Li B, Li PZ. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2008, 497, 31–36.10.1016/j.msea.2008.07.022 ↗
14. Tang YP, Liu L, Li WW, Shen B, Hu WB. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2009, 255, 4393–4400.10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.10.124 ↗
15. Chu SJ, Wu RJ. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 1997, 7, 132–136.
16. Wu JX, Li PX, Wu RJ. J. Compos. Mater. 1992, 9, 77–81.10.1016/0378-3812(92)85102-E ↗
17. Diwanji AP, Hall IW. J. Mater. Sci. 1992, 27, 2093–2100.10.1007/BF01117922 ↗
18. Carotenuto G, Nicolais L, Kuang X. Sci. Eng. Compos. Mater. 1996, 5, 17–26.10.1515/SECM.1996.5.1.17 ↗
19. Wang CC, Chen GQ, Wang X, Zhang Q, Yang WS, Wu GH. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2012, 43A, 2514–2519.10.1007/s11661-012-1090-z ↗