Aging hardening characteristic and electrical conductivity of Cu-Cr-Zr-Mo in situ composite
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Cu-0.85Cr-0.5Zr-0.5Mo in situ composite was prepared by continuous casting, cold drawing, and aging treatment. By means of the analysis of microhardness, electrical conductivity, and transmission electron microscopy, the aging characteristics and microstructures of the in situ composite were investigated at different aging temperatures and aging times after cold deformation. The results show that the Cu-0.85Cr-0.5Zr-0.5Mo in situ composite has an excellent combination of the microhardness and electrical conductivity aged at 500°C for 4 h, and the microhardness and electrical conductivity reach 171 HV and 81.3% IACS, respectively. Small dispersed particles could strongly pin dislocations and stabilize the substructure from deformation. The main strengthening mechanisms for the in situ composite alloy are the work hardening and the secondary phase or interface strengthening. It was suggested that cold deformation before aging treatment can accelerate the precipitation of the secondary phase and improve the comprehensive properties of the Cu-Cr-Zr-Mo in situ composite.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced materials and composites · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technologies for Comprehensive Utilization of Platinum Metals, Kunming Institute of Precious Metals, Kunming, Yunnan 650106, P.R. China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. Seyyed Mohammd HH, Fatemeh M, Gholam HA. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 2010, 17, 629–634.10.1007/s12613-010-0366-9 ↗
2. Zhou ZM, Wang YP, Gao J, Kolbe M. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2005, 398, 318–322.10.1016/j.msea.2005.03.095 ↗
3. Sun ZB, Wang YH, Guo J. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2006, 16, 998–1002.10.1016/S1003-6326(06)60367-1 ↗
4. Peng LM, Mao XM, Xu KD, Ding WJ. Rare Met. 2002, 21, 62–66.
5. Su JH, Dong QM, Liu P. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2003, 19, 529–532.
6. Zhao P, Pecht M. Microelectron. Reliab. 2003, 43, 775–778.10.1016/S0026-2714(03)00064-7 ↗
7. Yao DW, Meng L. Physica B. 2008, 403, 3384–3388.10.1016/j.physb.2008.04.038 ↗
8. Ryu HJ, Baik HK. J. Mater. Sci. 2000, 35, 3641–3646.10.1023/A:1004830000742 ↗
9. Batra IS, Dey GK, Kulkarni UD, Banerjee S. J. Nucl. Mater. 2001, 299, 91–100.10.1016/S0022-3115(01)00691-2 ↗
10. Liu P, Kang BX. Chin. J. Nonferrous Met. 1999, 9, 241–246.
11. Tu JP, Qi WX. Wear 2002, 249, 1021–1027.10.1016/S0043-1648(01)00843-2 ↗
12. Xie CS, Zhou J. Heat Treat. Met. 2001, 26, 12–14.
13. Huang FX, Ma JS, Ning HL, Geng ZT, Lu C, Guo SM, Yu XT, Wang T, Li H, Lou HF. Scr. Mater. 2003, 48, 97–102.
14. Li HQ, Xie SS, Wu PY, Mi XJ. Rare Met. 2007, 26, 124–130.10.1016/S1001-0521(07)60171-5 ↗
15. Su JH, Ren FZ, Tian BH, Liu P, Dong QM. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2009, 25, 230–232.
16. Liu P, Su JH, Dong QM, Li HJ. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2005, 21, 475–478.
17. Song LP, Yin ZM, Li NN, Zhang W. Chin. J. Rare Met. 2004, 28, 122–126.