Study on preparation of magnesium-rich composite coating and performance enhancement by graft modification of epoxy resin
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Magnesium (Mg)-rich primer is considered as a substitute for high polluted chromate treatment technology to provide cathodic protection for aluminum (Al) alloy. In this paper, Mg-rich primer with comprehensive properties was prepared by modifying epoxy resin using direct mixing. Specifically, the influence factors on the dispersion of Mg powder in epoxy, the modification of epoxy resin using organic silicones and the performance of Mg-modified epoxy composite coating were studied. The results show that Mg powder with small particle size has a better dispersion in epoxy; The mechanical property such as flexibility and impact resistance decreases with the addition of Mg powder, but which was improved when using modified epoxy as the resin matrix due to introduction of Si-O-Si flexible chain; In addition, the grafting efficiency between hydroxyl terminated polydimethylsiloxane and epoxy resin was improved because of the introduced silane coupling agent like KH550 contains amino group; The electrochemical test results indicate Mg-rich primer could provide effective electrochemical protection for Al alloy by raising the corrosion potential and reducing the corrosion current density to bare substrate,respectively.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry · Polymer composites and self-healing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Qingdao , China
Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Corrosion and Bio-Fouling, IOCAS , National Marine Corrosion Protection Engineering Research Center) , 7 Nanhai Road , Qingdao , Shandong 266071 , China
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Sathiyanarayanan S, Azim S, Venkatachari G.J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2008, 107, 2224-2230.10.1002/app.2725410.1002/app.27254 ↗
2. Oliveiraa MAS, Moraesa JJ, Faezb R. Prog. Org. Coat. 2009, 65, 348–356.10.1016/j.porgcoat.2009.02.003
3. Que WX, Sun Z, Zhou Y. Mater Lett. 2000, 42, 326-330.10.1016/S0167-577X(99)00207-410.1016/S0167-577X(99)00207-4 ↗
4. Varma PCR., Duffy B, Cassidy J. Surf. Coat. Techn. 2009, 204, 277-284.10.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.07.02410.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.07.024 ↗
5. Wang T, Tan YJ. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2006, 132, 48-53.10.1016/j.mseb.2006.02.03510.1016/j.mseb.2006.02.035 ↗
6. Gvozdenovi MM, Branimir NG. Prog. Org. Coat. 2009, 65, 401-404.10.1016/j.porgcoat.2009.01.004
7. Nanna ME, Bierwagen GP. J. Coat. Techn. Res. 2004, 1, 69-80.10.1007/s11998-004-0001-710.1007/s11998-004-0001-7 ↗
8. Xu H, Battocchi D, Tallman DE. Corros. 2009, 65, 318-325.10.5006/1.331913610.5006/1.3319136 ↗
9. Liu LM, Xu RZ, Song G. Surf. Coat. Techn. 2010, 20, 332-337.10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.06.053 ↗
10. Maier B, Frankel GS. Corros. 2011, 67, 1-15.10.5006/1.3586018 ↗
11. Lu X, Zuo Y, Zhao X. Corros. Sci. 2011, 53, 153-160.10.1016/j.corsci.2010.09.00810.1016/j.corsci.2010.09.008 ↗
12. Bierwagen GP, Brown R, Battocchi D. Prog. Org. Coat. 2010, 68, 48-61.10.1016/j.porgcoat.2009.10.03110.1016/j.porgcoat.2009.10.031 ↗
13. Ravindran N, Chattopadhyay DK, Zakula A. Poly. Degradation and Stability 2010, 95, 1160-1166.10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.04.01510.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.04.015 ↗
14. Simoes AM, Battocchi D, Tallman DE. Prog. Org. Coat. 2008, 63, 260-266.10.1016/j.porgcoat.2008.02.00710.1016/j.porgcoat.2008.02.007 ↗
15. Wang D, Battocchi D, Allahar KN. Corros. Sci. 2010, 52, 441-448.10.1016/j.corsci.2009.10.00110.1016/j.corsci.2009.10.001 ↗
16. Allahar KN, Battocchi D, Orazem ME. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2008, 155, 143-149.10.1149/1.2965519 ↗
17. Li J, He J, Chisholm BJ. J. Coat. Techn. Res. 2010, 7, 757-764.10.1007/s11998-010-9264-310.1007/s11998-010-9264-3 ↗
18. Cao CN, Principle of Electrochemical in Corrosion, 3rd ed., Chemical Industry Press: Beijing, 2008.
19. Bierwagen GP, Tallman D, Li J. Prog. Org. Coat. 2003, 46, 148-157.10.1016/S0300-9440(02)00222-9 ↗
20. Ge CY, Guo YD, Ma XM, Hou BR. e-Polymers 2016, 17, 137-148.10.1515/epoly-2016-0166 ↗
21. Murias P,Maciejewski H, Galina H. Europ. Polym. 2012, 48, 769-773.10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2012.01.00910.1016/j.eurpolymj.2012.01.009 ↗
22. Chen J, Kinloch AJ, Sprenger S. Polymer 2013, 54, 4276-4289.10.1016/j.polymer.2013.06.00910.1016/j.polymer.2013.06.009 ↗
23. Chruściel JJ, Leśniak E. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2015, 41, 67-121.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.08.00110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.08.001 ↗