Effect of the manufacturing process on the equivalency qualification of glass fiber reinforced polymer
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) is widely used as aerospace material requiring high specific strength, specific stiffness, and excellent mechanical and chemical properties. To apply the already approved composite materials to other processes, an equivalency test that compares the mechanical properties of the composite materials based on the database is required. For the successful completion of the equivalency test, it is important to control the factors affecting the mechanical properties. The resin content and density of the specimens are manufactured differently according to the process. The effect of these factors on the change of mechanical properties required for equivalency qualification has not been sufficiently reported. In this study, an equivalency test was performed on the GFRP applied to the aircraft radome based on the procedure of the equivalency test and acceptance test proposed by the National Center for Advanced Materials Performance. The causes of problems occurring between equivalency tests were analyzed. It was confirmed that the resin content, density, and voids of the specimen affect the mechanical properties. As the resin content decreases, the density and voids were controlled, and it was confirmed that the average strength and modulus increase by 13.12 and 6.78%, respectively. The equivalency qualification was completed by applying an improved process in which these factors were controlled.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Engineering Applied Research · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Nano Convergence Materials Center, Emerging Materials R&D Division, Korea Institute of Ceramic Engineering and Technology , Jinju 52851 , Korea
Shool of Materials Science and Engineering, Kyungpook National University , Daegu 702-701 , Korea
Air Vehicle Analysis Department, Korea Aerospace Industries, Ltd. , Sacheon 52529 , Korea
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Srinivasulu NV, Tejaswi V. Mechanical properties of polymer composite materials. Int J Res Eng Technol. 2012;1:78–81.10.15623/ijret.2012.0101010 ↗
2. Adin H, Adin MS. Effect of particles on tensile and bending properties of jute epoxy composites. Mater Test. 2022;64(3):401–11.10.1515/mt-2021-2038 ↗
3. Pihtili H. An experimental investigation of wear of glass fibre–epoxy resin and glass fibre–polyester resin composite materials. Eur Polym J. 2009;45:149–54.10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.10.006 ↗
4. Tomblin JS, Tauriello JD, Doyle SP. A composite material qualification method that results in cost, time and risk reduction. J Adv Mater Covina. 2002;34(4):41–51.10.1057/palgrave.rm.8240108 ↗
5. Tomblin JS, Ng CY, Raju KS. Material qualification and equivalency for polymer matrix composite material systems. FAA Technical Report: NTIS, Springfield, VA. in press; 2003 Sep. Report no.: DOT/FAA/AR-03-19.
6. Haris MY, Laila D, Zainudin ES, Mustapha F, Zahari R, Halim Z. Preliminary review of biocomposites materials for aircraft radome application. Key Eng Mater. 2011;471–472:563–7.10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.471-472.563 ↗
7. Crone GAE, Rudge AW, Taylor GN. Design and performance of airborne radomes: A review. Proc Inst Elect Eng. 1981;128(7):451–64.10.1049/ip-f-1.1981.0077 ↗
8. Ochola RO, Marcus K, Nurick GN, Franz T. Mechanical behavior of glass and carbon fiber reinforced composites at varying strain rates. Compos Struct. 2004;63(3):455–67.10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00194-6 ↗
9. Sakin R, Ay I, Yaman R. An investigation of bending fatigue behavior for glass-fiber reinforced polyester composite materials. Mater Des. 2008;29(1):212–7.10.1016/j.matdes.2006.11.006 ↗
10. Adin MS, Kiliçkap E. Strength of double-reinforced adhesive joints. Mater Test. 2021;63:2.10.1515/mt-2020-0024 ↗
11. Moradpour P, Pirayesh H, Gerami M, Jouybari IR. Laminated strand lumber (LSL) reinforced by GFRP; mechanical and physical properties. Constr Build Mater. 2018;158:236–42.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.172 ↗
12. Al-Maamoria MH, Abd Alradhab RM, Al-Mosawi AI. Mechanical properties for unsaturated polyester reinforcement by glass fiber using ultrasonic technique. Int J Multidiscip Curr Res. 2013;1:1–4.
13. Lee N, Jang J. The effect of fibre content on the mechanical properties of glass fibre mat/polypropylene composites. Compos Part A: Appl S. 1999;30(6):815–22.10.1016/S1359-835X(98)00185-7 ↗
14. Hamidi YK, Dharmavaram S, Aktas L, Altan MC. Effect of fiber content on void morphology in resin transfer molded E-glass/epoxy composites. J Eng Mater Technol. 2009;131:021014–21.10.1115/1.3030944 ↗
15. Seo D, Yang S, Kim KY, Park MG, Park D, Lee E, et al. Study on properties of carbon sheet molding compound (C-SMC) according to resin and carbon fiber ratio. Text Color Finish. 2020;32(4):245–54.
16. Hu W, Centea T, Nutt S. Effects of material and process parameters on void evolution in unidirectional prepreg during vacuum bag-only cure. J Compos Mater. 2020;54(5):633–45.10.1177/0021998319864420 ↗
17. Matsuzaki R, Seto D, Todoroki A, Mizutani Y. Void formation in geometry–anisotropic woven fabrics in resin transfer molding. Adv Compos Mater. 2014;23(2):99–114.10.1080/09243046.2013.832829 ↗
18. Chen Z, Peng L, Xiao Z. Experimental characterization and numerical simulation of voids in CFRP components processed by HP-RTM. Materials. 2022;15:5249.10.3390/ma15155249 ↗
19. Helmus R, Kratz J, Potter K, Hubert P, Hinterhölzl R. An experimental technique to characterize interply void formation in unidirectional prepregs. J Compos Mater. 2017;51(5):579–91.10.1177/0021998316650273 ↗
20. Hu W, Centea T, Nutt S. Mechanisms of inter-ply void formation during vacuum bag-only cure of woven prepregs. Polym Compos. 2020;41(5):1785–95.10.1002/pc.25497 ↗
21. ASTM D3039-08. Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2014.
22. ASTM D6641-16. Standard test method for compressive properties of polymer matrix composite materials using a combined loading compression (CLC) test fixture. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2017.
23. ASTM D5229-20. Standard test method for moisture absorption properties and equilibrium conditioning of polymer matrix composite materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2020.
24. ASTM D792-20. Standard test methods for density and specific gravity (relative density) of plastics by displacement. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2020.
25. ASTM D3171-06. Standard test methods for constituent content of composite materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2010.
26. De Almeida SFM, Neto ZD. Effect of void content on the strength of composite laminates. Compos Struct. 1994;28(2):139–48.10.1016/0263-8223(94)90044-2 ↗
27. Mehdikhani M, Gorbatikh L, Verpoest I, Lomov SV. Voids in fiber-reinforced polymer composites: A review on their formation, characteristics, and effects on mechanical performance. J Compos Mater. 2018;53(12):1579–1669.10.1177/0021998318772152 ↗
28. Costa ML, Rezende MC, de Almeida SFM. Effect of void content on the moisture absorption in polymeric composites. Polym Plast Technol. 2006;45(6):691–8.10.1080/03602550600609549 ↗
29. Kardos JL, Duduković MP, Dave R. Void growth and resin transport during processing of thermosetting – matrix composites. Adv Polym Sci. 1986;80:101–23.10.1007/3-540-16423-5_13 ↗
30. Costa VAF, Sousa ACM. Modeling of flow and thermo-kinetics during the cure of thick laminated composites. Int J Therm Sci. 2003;42(1):15–22.10.1016/S1290-0729(02)00003-0 ↗
31. Gangloff JJ, Daniel C, Advani SG. A model of two-phase resin and void flow during composites processing. Int J Multiphas Flow. 2014;65:51–60.10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2014.05.015 ↗
32. Sajith S, Arumugam V, Dhakal HN. Effects of curing pressure on mode II fracture toughness of uni-directional GFRP laminates. Polym Test. 2015;48:59–68.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2015.09.011 ↗
33. MIL-STD-810G. Department of defense test method standard: environmental engineering considerations and laboratory tests. U.S. Army Developmental Test Command; 2008.
34. Sateesha N, Sampath Rao S, Ravishankerc DV, Satyanarayana K. Effect of moisture on GFRP composite materials. Mater Today P. 2015;2(4–5):2902–8.10.1016/j.matpr.2015.07.252 ↗
35. Xin H, Liu Y, Mosallam AS, He J, Du A. Evaluation on material behaviors of pultruded glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) laminates. Compos Struct. 2017;182:283–300.10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.006 ↗