Dough moulding compound reinforced silicone rubber insulating composites using polymerized styrene butadiene rubber as a compatibilizer
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Dough moulding compound (DMC) reinforced polymerized styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) / methyl vinyl silicone rubber (MVQ) composites were prepared, in which MVQ was matrix, DMC was a reinforcement phase and SBR was a compatibilizer. Dynamic thermomechanical analysis (DMA), infrared spectrum analysis (IR) and the effect of SBR and DMC content on mechanical properties, electrical insulating property and compatibility of the composites were investigated. The results showd that the morphology and thermal properties of the composites were improved when dough moulding compound was used as a reinforcement, and styrene butadiene rubber was compatibilizer, and had excellent insulating property with volume resistivity above 4.8×1012 Ω·m.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Qiqihar University , Qiqihar 161006 , China
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Van Leeuwen RP, De Wit JB, Smit GJM. Energ. Convers. Manage. 2017, 150, 941-948.10.1016/j.enconman.2017.05.08110.1016/j.enconman.2017.05.081 ↗
2. Olabi AG. Energy 2017, 136, 1-6.10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.05410.1016/j.energy.2017.07.054 ↗
3. Vidadili N, Suleymanov E, Bulut C, Mahmudlu C. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2017, 80, 1153-1161.10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.16810.1016/j.rser.2017.05.168 ↗
4. Gielen D, Boshell F, Saygin D, Bazilian MD, Wagner N, Gorini R. Energy Strateg. Rev. 2019, 24, 38-50.10.1016/j.esr.2019.01.00610.1016/j.esr.2019.01.006 ↗
5. Thellufsen JZ, Lund H. Appl. Energ. 2016, 183, 419-429.10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.09.00510.1016/j.apenergy.2016.09.005 ↗
6. Samakosh JD, Mirzaie M. Int. J. Elec. Power. 2019, 108, 382-391. [7] Patil Y, Sharma S. Sci. Eng. Compos. Mater. 2018, 25, 517–528.10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.01.02810.1016/j.ijepes.2019.01.028 ↗
7. Patil Y, Sharma S. Sci. Eng. Compos. Mater. 2018, 25, 517–528.10.1515/secm-2016-0167 ↗
8. Matsuura K, Saito H. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018, 135, 46192.10.1002/app.46192
9. Aouabed F, Bayadi A, Boudissa R. Electr. Pow. Syst. Res. 2017, 143, 66-72.10.1016/j.epsr.2016.10.02510.1016/j.epsr.2016.10.025 ↗
10. Terrab H, Kara A. Electr. Pow. Syst. Res. 2018.163. 782-788.10.1016/j.epsr.2017.06.00210.1016/j.epsr.2017.06.002 ↗
11. Rezazadeh N, Rezazadeh J. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2019, 475, 201-204.10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.11.11710.1016/j.jmmm.2018.11.117 ↗
12. Esmizadeh E, Naderi G, Arezoomand S, Mazinani S. Sci. Eng. Compos. Mater. 2018, 25, 31–39.10.1515/secm-2015-040610.1515/secm-2015-0406 ↗
13. Kumar V, Lee DJ. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2019. 715. 195-203.10.1016/j.cplett.2018.11.04210.1016/j.cplett.2018.11.042 ↗
14. Kong JH, Sun JT, Tong YJ, Dou QQ, He CB. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2019. 169. 232-241.10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.11.00610.1016/j.compscitech.2018.11.006 ↗
15. Khattak A, Iqbal M, Amin M. Sci. Eng. Compos. Mater. 2017, 24, 679-689.10.1515/secm-2015-0327 ↗
16. Park HW, Park JW, Lee JH, Kim HJ, Shin S. Eur. Polym. J. 2019, 112, 320-327.10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.01.02110.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.01.021 ↗
17. Bui R, Brook MA. Polymer 2019, 160, 282-290.10.1016/j.polymer.2018.11.04310.1016/j.polymer.2018.11.043 ↗
18. Wu WL, Cai JY. Adv. Mater. Res. 2013, 800, 383-386.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.800.38310.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.800.383 ↗
19. Lipińska M, Imiela M. Polym. Test. 2019, 75, 26-37.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.01.02010.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.01.020 ↗
20. Moni Ribeiro Filho SL, Oliveira PR, Panzera TH, Scarpa F. Compos. Part B-Eng. 2019, 159, 157-164.10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.05410.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.054 ↗