journal article·2017-11-27Open access

Effect of crude oil and well stream chemical on glass fiber epoxy composite pipes

Meshal Al-Samhan, Salah Al-Enezi, Aseel Al-Banna, Abdirahman Yussuf

Abstract

Abstract Glass-reinforced epoxy (GRE) pipes are used as an alternative to carbon steel pipes in desert oil field applications owing to their good properties such as chemical resistance, thermal resistance and mechanical properties. In the desert oil field service, the pipes are exposed to different harsh environmental conditions such as high temperature, humidity and ultraviolet radiation. The harsh environmental conditions can affect the properties of GRE pipes, which, in turn, can impact their performance. The present study covers the effects of environment factors such as crude oil and well stream chemicals on the properties of GRE pipes. The pipe samples were aged in wet crude, effluent water and scale inhibitor to simulate the exposure to desert oil field service. The aged samples were evaluated for their mechanical properties, thermal stability and chemical resistance. The compositional change in the composite structures was characterized using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and matrix deterioration by scanning electron microscopy. Swelling studies revealed no significant diffusion by the chemical media. Tensile testing showed a slight change in tensile strength with aging in crude oil. In addition, all the pipe samples showed adequate thermal stability to withstand harsh environmental conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · High voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena · Mechanical Behavior of Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Polymeric Products and Customization Program, Petroleum Research Center, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research , Ahmadi, P.O. Box 24885 , Kuwait

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Edwards KL. Mater. Des. 1998, 19, 1–10.10.1016/S0261-3069(98)00007-710.1016/S0261-3069(98)00007-7 ↗
2. Jain R, Lee L, Eds. In Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Composites for Infrastructure Applications. Focusing on Innovation, Technology Implementation and Sustainability, Springer: New York, 2012.10.1007/978-94-007-2357-3 ↗
3. Pihtili H, Tosun N. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2002, 62, 367–370.10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00196-810.1016/S0266-3538(01)00196-8 ↗
4. Kukureka SN, Hooke CJ, Rao M, Liao P, Chen YK. Tribol. Int. 1999, 32, 107–116.10.1016/S0301-679X(99)00017-110.1016/S0301-679X(99)00017-1 ↗
5. Samhan M, Enezi S. Int. J. Plast. Technol. 2014, 18, 113–124.10.1007/s12588-014-9074-z10.1007/s12588-014-9074-z ↗
6. Croll SG, Shi X, Fernando BMD. Prog. Org. Coat. 2008, 61, 136–144.10.1016/j.porgcoat.2007.09.02410.1016/j.porgcoat.2007.09.024 ↗
7. Leveque D, Schieffer A, Mavel A, Maire JF. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2005, 65, 395–401.10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.09.01610.1016/j.compscitech.2004.09.016 ↗
8. Tian W, Hodgki J. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 115, 2981–2985.10.1002/app.3139410.1002/app.31394 ↗
9. Dao B, Hodgkin J, Kristina J, Mardel J, Tian W. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010,115, 901–910.10.1002/app.3102910.1002/app.31029 ↗
10. Kanchanomai C, Thammaruechuc A. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 2009, 94, 1772–1778.10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2009.06.01210.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2009.06.012 ↗
11. Kanchanomai C, Rattananon S, Soni M. Polym. Test. 2005, 24, 886–892.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.06.00610.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.06.006 ↗
12. Karbhari VM, Murphy K, Zhang S. J. Compos. Mater. 2002, 36, 2101–2121.10.1177/002199830203601797710.1177/0021998302036017977 ↗
13. Ray BC. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006, 298, 111–117.10.1016/j.jcis.2005.12.02310.1016/j.jcis.2005.12.023 ↗
14. Gu H, Hongxia S. Mater. Des. 2008, 29, 262–264.10.1016/j.matdes.2006.11.01010.1016/j.matdes.2006.11.010 ↗
15. Garcia-Espinel JD, Castro-Fresno D, Parbole Gayo P, Ballester-Muñoz F. Mater. Des. 2015, 66, 46–50.10.1016/j.matdes.2014.10.03210.1016/j.matdes.2014.10.032 ↗
16. Nikolic G, Zlatkovic S, Cakic M, Cakic S, Lacnjevac C, Rajic Z. Sensors 2010, 10, 684–696.10.3390/s10010068410.3390/s100100684 ↗
17. Atta AM, Shaker NO, Abdou MI, Abdelfatah M. Prog. Org. Coat. 2006, 56, 91–99.10.1016/j.porgcoat.2005.11.00310.1016/j.porgcoat.2005.11.003 ↗
18. Smith RE, Larsen FN, Long CL. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1984, 29, 3713–3726.10.1002/app.1984.07029120710.1002/app.1984.070291207 ↗
19. Khan SU, Kim JK. Int. J. Aero. Space Sci. 2011, 12, 115–133.10.5139/IJASS.2011.12.2.115 ↗
20. Tsai JL, Kuo JC, Hsu SM. J. Mater. Sci. 2006, 41, 7406–7412.10.1007/s10853-006-0800-610.1007/s10853-006-0800-6 ↗
21. George J, Sreekala MS, Thomas S. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2001, 41, 1471–1485.10.1002/pen.1084610.1002/pen.10846 ↗
22. He M, Zhang D, Guo J, Qin S, Ming X. Polym. Compos. 2014, 35, 2067–2073.10.1002/pc.2286810.1002/pc.22868 ↗