Microstructure and properties of W-Cu/1Cr18Ni9 steel brazed joint with different Ni-based filler metals
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract W-Cu alloy and 1Cr18Ni9 steel were brazed with NiCrSiBFeTi and NiMnSiCuZr filler metals in a vacuum furnace. The main microstructure of the NiCrSiBFeTi brazing seam region was a Ni-based solid solution of W, Cu, Cr, and Fe dissolved in the Ni phase and intermetallic compounds CrB and TiCr 2 . The main microstructure of the NiMnSiCuZr brazing seam region was a Ni-based solid solution of Cu, Cr, and Fe dissolved in the Ni phase Fe-based solid solution of Ni, Cu, and Cr dissolved in the Fe phase and intermetallic compounds Mn 5 Si 3 , Ni 3 Si, and Ni 7 Zr 2 . The elements Ni, Si, and Ti contained in the NiCrSiBFeTi filler metal and the elements Ni, Mn, and Si contained in the NiMnSiCuZr filler metal were more easily diffused into the interface of W-Cu alloy compared with that of 1Cr18Ni9 steel. The shear strength values of NiCrSiBFeTi joint and NiMnSiCuZr joint were approximately 285 and 249 MPa, respectively, and fracture of the two joints occurred at the interface near the W-Cu alloy side. The fracture morphology of the former was identified as cleavage brittle fracture, and the latter was identified as intergranular brittle fracture.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced materials and composites · Fusion materials and technologies · Metal Alloys Wear and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Provincial Lab of Advanced Welding Technology , Jiangsu University of Science and Technology , Zhenjiang 212003 , China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
References (13)
Show source-provided references
1. Lv DM, Zhou WP. China Tungsten Industry 2009, 24, 107–110.
2. Hanado H, Hiraoka Y. Mater. Trans. 2007, 48, 775–779.10.2320/matertrans.48.77510.2320/matertrans.48.775 ↗
3. Fan JL, Liu T, Zhu S. Cemented Carbide 2011, 28, 56–65.
4. Xia CZ, Liang QH, Zou JS, Xu XP. High Temp. Mater. Processes 2014, 33, 293–298.10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.12.151 ↗
5. Hanado H, Hiraoka Y. Adv. Mater. Res. 2007, 15, 255–260.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.15-17.255 ↗
6. Kalin BA, Fedotov VT, Sevrjukov ON, Kalashnikov AN, Suchkov AN, Moeslang A. J. Nucl. Mater. 2007, 367, 1218–1222.10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.222 ↗
7. Liang QH, Xia CZ, Xu XP, Zou JS. Sci. Eng. Compos. Mater. 2015, 22, 245–250.10.1515/secm-2013-0206 ↗
8. Hu S, Feng S, Ren LN, Yang QH, Liu Y, Yang WB. Rare Met. Mater. Eng. 2008, 37, 671–673.
9. Jiang GS, Gu Y, Wang ZF, He P, Cui DT. Surface Technol. 2009, 38, 42–43.
10. Xia CZ, Yang J, Zou JS, Xu XP. Kovove Mater. 2016, 54, 1–7.10.4149/km_2016_3_159 ↗
11. Yuan XJ, Kang CY, Kim MB. Mater. Charact. 2009, 60, 923–931.10.1016/j.matchar.2009.03.00410.1016/j.matchar.2009.03.004 ↗
12. Jing JN, Yu ZS, Chang WL, Qin YQ. Mater. Mech. Eng. 2013, 37, 10–13.
13. Wang FZ, Wang QZ, Yu BH, Xiao BL, Ma ZY. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2011, 211, 1804–1809.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.06.00310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.06.003 ↗