2D macro-mechanical FE simulations for machining unidirectional FRP composite: the influence of damage models
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract To investigate the influence of material damage models on machining simulation of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymer composites (FRP), a two-dimensional (2D) macro-mechanical finite element (FE) model was developed. Four failure criteria in combination with two degradation models were implemented in the machining simulation. The simulation results were compared with experimental data in literature. It is shown that both failure criterion and degradation model have significant influence on the chip shapes, cutting forces and sub-surface damages. The cutting forces and chip shapes predicted by Maximum stress criterion with progressive damage model has a relatively better agreement with experimental observations. The simulated sub-surface damage also agrees with experiments for low fiber orientation angles.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory of Contemporary Design and Integrated Manufacturing Technology, Ministry of Education, School of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, 710072, P.R. China
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Aveiro, Campus Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, 710072, P.R. China
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Findik F, Misirlioglu M, Soy U. Sci. Eng. Compos. Mater. 2002, 10, 287–296.10.1515/SECM.2002.10.4.287 ↗
2. Wang DH, Ramulu M, Arola D. Int. J. Machine Tools Manuf. 1995, 35, 1623–1638.10.1016/0890-6955(95)00014-O ↗
3. Wang XM, Zhang LC. Int. J. Machine Tools Manuf. 2003, 43, 1015–1022.10.1016/S0890-6955(03)00090-7 ↗
4. Zitoune R, Collombet F, Lachaud F,·Piquet R, Pasquet P. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2005, 65, 455–466.10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.09.028 ↗
5. Nayak D, Bhatnagar N, Mahajan P. Machining Sci. Technol. 2005, 9, 481–501.10.1080/10910340500398167 ↗
6. Dandekar CR, Shin YC. Int. J. Machine Tools Manuf. 2012, 57, 102–121.10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.01.006 ↗
7. Dandekar CR, Shin YC. Trans ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2008, 130, 051016/1–12.10.1115/1.2976146 ↗
8. Nayak D, Bhatnagar N, Mahajan P. Machining Sci. Technol. 2005, 9, 503–528.10.1080/10910340500398183 ↗
9. Rao GVG, Mahajan P, Bhatnagar N. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2007, 67, 579–593.10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.08.010 ↗
10. Mkaddem A, Demirci I, Mansori E. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2008, 68, 3123–3127.10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.07.009 ↗
11. Arola D, Ramulu M. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 1997, 39, 597–613.10.1016/S0020-7403(96)00061-6 ↗
12. Arola D, Sultan MB, Ramulu M. Trans. ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2002, 124, 32–41.10.1115/1.1428329 ↗
13. Ramesh MV, Seetharamu KN, Ganesan N, Sivakumar MS. Int. J. Machine Tools Manuf. 1998, 38, 1531–1549.10.1016/S0890-6955(98)00008-X ↗
14. Mahdi M, Zhang LC. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2001, 113, 373–377.10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00675-6 ↗
15. Mahdi M, Zhang LC. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2001, 113, 368–372.10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00676-8 ↗
16. Rao GV, Mahajana P, Bhatnagarb N. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2008, 498,142–149.
17. Mkaddem A, Mansori ME. Mater. Des. 2009, 30, 3295–3302.10.1016/j.matdes.2008.12.009 ↗
18. Lasri L, Nouari M, Mansori ME. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2009, 69, 684–692.10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.01.004 ↗
19. Santiuste C, Soldani X, Miguélez MH. Compos. Struct. 2010, 92, 691–698.10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.09.021 ↗
20. Santiuste C, Miguélez MH, Soldani X. Compos. Struct. 2011, 93, 2706–2713.10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.05.034 ↗
21. Soldani X, Santiuste C, Muñoz-Sánchez A, Miguélez MH. Compos. Part A 2011, 42, 1205–1216.10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.04.023 ↗
22. Yuan JM, Takeda N. Sci. Eng. Compos. Mater. 2000, 9, 1–108.
23. Liu PF, Zheng JY. Mater. Des. 2010, 31, 3825–3834.10.1016/j.matdes.2010.03.031 ↗
24. Hurtado JA, Lapczyk I. Composites Part A 2007, 38, 2333–2341.10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.01.017 ↗
25. Baker M, Rosler J, Siemers C. Comput. Struct. 2002, 80, 495–513.10.1016/S0045-7949(02)00023-8 ↗
26. Saffar RJ, Razfar MR, Zarei O, Ghassemieh E. Simul. Model Pract. Th. 2008, 16, 1677–1688.10.1016/j.simpat.2008.08.010 ↗
27. Vaziri MR, Salimi M, Mashayekhi M. Simul. Model Pract. Th. 2011, 19, 718–733.10.1016/j.simpat.2010.09.006 ↗
28. Bordeu F, Boucard PA, Lubineau G. Sci. Eng. Compos. Mater. 2010, 17, 271–282.10.1515/SECM.2010.17.4.271 ↗