journal article·2025-08-08

Electrolyte Immersion Increases Photoconductivity in a Model Polymer Photocathode

William P. Kopcha, Aiswarya Abhisek Mohapatra, Casey M. Davis, Jonathan R. Thurston, Eui Hyun Suh, Bo Dong, Megan R. Brown, Aniruddha Basu, Zejie Chen, Shane Ardo, Chad M. Risko, Tianquan Lian, Erin L. Ratcliff, Stephen Barlow, Seth R. Marder, Michael F. Toney, Melissa K. Gish, Andrew J. Ferguson, Obadiah G. Reid

ACS Energy Letters· Volume 10· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

Immersing polymer solar cells in aqueous electrolyte for photoelectrochemical (PEC) hydrogen production is likely to cause photophysical changes that could present both challenges and opportunities for engineering functional and durable devices. Herein we study the bulk heterojunction blend poly(4,8-bis(5-(2-ethylhexyl)thiophen-2-yl)benzo[1,2- b:4,5- b ′]dithiophene-2,6-diyl)- alt -(2-(((2-ethylhexyl)oxy)carbonyl)-3-fluorothieno[3,4- b ]thiophene-4,6-diyl):poly( N, N ′-di(2-octyldodecyl)naphthalene-1,8:4,5-bis(dicarboximide)-2,6-diyl)- alt -(2,2-bithiophene-5,5′-diyl) (PTB7-Th:N2200) excited-state dynamics in electrolyte from femtosecond to millisecond time scales using pump–probe microwave conductivity and absorption spectroscopy. While the blend swells very little, electrolyte exposure increases the microwave-frequency mobility and possibly the yield of photogenerated charges while also decreasing crystallinity. These results indicate an enhancement in key performance metrics, implying that any limitations on the performance of PEC test devices do not arise from active layer–electrolyte interactions. For the PTB7-Th:N2200 blend or similar photocathode systems, our results indicate that improving the interfacial kinetics and/or the carrier lifetime should be prioritized, not protecting the active layer from the electrolyte. Since this observation may not be universal to all polymer systems, future research should focus on identifying their limiting photophysical processes.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Materials, Chemical, and Computational Science Directorate

National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Institute

University of Colorado Boulder

Department of Chemistry

School of Materials Science and Engineering

Georgia Institute of Technology

Emory University

University of Kentucky

University of California Irvine

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering

Department of Materials Science and Engineering

Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering

Materials Science and Engineering Program

Funding

Basic Energy Sciences

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0178210.1021/acsenergylett.3c01782 ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20221048110.1002/adma.202210481 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41467-018-07420-610.1038/s41467-018-07420-6 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41563-019-0591-110.1038/s41563-019-0591-1 ↗
5. 10.1038/s42004-020-0288-z10.1038/s42004-020-0288-z ↗
6. 10.1021/jacs.2c0710310.1021/jacs.2c07103 ↗
7. 10.1002/anie.20160353210.1002/anie.201603532 ↗
8. 10.1002/anie.20160701810.1002/anie.201607018 ↗
9. 10.1002/anie.20151054210.1002/anie.201510542 ↗
10. 10.1021/jacs.5b0572410.1021/jacs.5b05724 ↗
11. 10.1039/C4CS00227J10.1039/C4CS00227J ↗
12. 10.1039/b812502n10.1039/b812502n ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c0095510.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00955 ↗
14. 10.1002/er.845610.1002/er.8456 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b0012710.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00127 ↗
16. 10.1021/cr050140x10.1021/cr050140x ↗
17. Bässler, H.; Köhler, A. In Unimolecular and Supramolecular Electronics I: Chemistry and Physics Meet at Metal-Molecule Interfaces; Metzger, R. M., Ed. Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012; pp 1–65.10.1007/128_2011_218 ↗
18. Turro N. J. · 2010
19. 10.1021/jp993513510.1021/jp9935135 ↗
20. 10.1039/C7CS00728K10.1039/C7CS00728K ↗
21. 10.1039/C9TC04285G10.1039/C9TC04285G ↗
22. 10.1021/jacs.0c0145210.1021/jacs.0c01452 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.20640610.1103/PhysRevLett.98.206406 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0575610.1021/acs.jpcc.5b05756 ↗
25. 10.1002/adfm.20242215610.1002/adfm.202422156 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41929-023-01069-110.1038/s41929-023-01069-1 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2024.12478110.1016/j.apcatb.2024.124781 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.rser.2021.11086610.1016/j.rser.2021.110866 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.10395010.1016/j.nanoen.2019.103950 ↗
30. 10.1021/jp300316x10.1021/jp300316x ↗
31. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.14921310.1016/j.cej.2024.149213 ↗
32. 10.1038/s41598-022-25476-910.1038/s41598-022-25476-9 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.orgel.2019.03.03310.1016/j.orgel.2019.03.033 ↗
35. 10.1002/adfm.20150419110.1002/adfm.201504191 ↗
36. van de Krol R. · 2011
37. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c0366510.1021/acs.jpclett.2c03665 ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b0311710.1021/acs.jpclett.9b03117 ↗
39. 10.1021/acsnano.4c0359010.1021/acsnano.4c03590 ↗
40. 10.1021/cr980081610.1021/cr9800816 ↗
41. 10.1039/D1RA01474A10.1039/D1RA01474A ↗
42. 10.1021/jacs.3c0370210.1021/jacs.3c03702 ↗
43. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c0065310.1021/acs.jpcc.4c00653 ↗
44. 10.1038/s41557-022-00911-610.1038/s41557-022-00911-6 ↗
45. 10.1039/D1MH01331A10.1039/D1MH01331A ↗
46. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0853710.1021/acs.jpcc.0c08537 ↗
47. 10.1038/3211810.1038/32118 ↗
48. 10.1021/jz201229a10.1021/jz201229a ↗
49. 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.04520410.1103/PhysRevB.73.045204 ↗
50. 10.1021/jp501087410.1021/jp5010874 ↗
51. 10.1021/acsami.1c1232110.1021/acsami.1c12321 ↗
52. 10.1021/acsnano.4c1721310.1021/acsnano.4c17213 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.cis.2025.10354410.1016/j.cis.2025.103544 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2025.23635610.1016/j.jpowsour.2025.236356 ↗