An automated portable multiaxial pressure test rig for qualifications of glass/epoxy composite pipes
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract An automated multiaxial cyclic loading pressure testing rig was developed as an alternative to the existing short-term test procedure specified by ISO 14692 and ASTM D2992. Conventionally, 14 months are required to estimate the residual properties at the end of expected life (20–50 years). The test periods and costs associated with this long-term test are high. To resolve this, a novel rig was developed based on the ultimate elastic wall stress (UEWS) algorithm, allowing five multiaxial stress ratios to be tested. The test involved the cyclic pressurizing of the pipe with 1-min of pressure and 1-min of zero pressure. The test rig was tested under five stress ratios using glass-epoxy composite pipes with winding angles of [±45°] 4 , [±55°] 4 and [±63°] 4 . The rig is capable of testing both static and cyclic pressure loading, thereby reducing the test period and related costs. The results provide a more realistic failure envelope.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Fire effects on concrete materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechatronic Engineering , Universiti Malaysia Perlis , Pauh Putra Campus, Arau 02600 , Perlis , Malaysia
Universiti Kuala Lumpur – Malaysian Spanish Institute , Kulim 09000, Kedah , Malaysia
School of Mechanical and Systems Engineering , Newcastle University , Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. STANDARD, B., & ISO, B. (2002). Petroleum and natural gas industries–glass reinforced plastics (GRP) piping – . BS EN ISO, 14692–2:2002, www.iso.org.
2. ASTM D2992-12 (2012). Standard Practice for Obtaining Hydrostatic or Pressure Design Basis for “Fibreglass” (Glass-Fibre-Reinforced Thermosetting-Resin) Pipe and Fittings, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012, www.astm.org.
3. Hull D, Legg MJ, Spencer B. Composites 1978, 9, 17–24.10.1016/0010-4361(78)90513-X10.1016/0010-4361(78)90513-X ↗
4. Grove S. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 1999, 1203, 18.10.1023/A:1006694000701 ↗
5. ASTM D3567-97 (2011). Standard Practice for Determining Dimensions of “Fibreglass” (Glass-Fibre-Reinforced Thermosetting Resin) Pipe and Fittings, ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, 2011, www.astm.org.
6. Krishnan P, Abdul Majid MS, Afendi M, Gibson AG, Marzuki HFA. Mater. Des. 2015, 88, 196–206.10.1016/j.matdes.2015.08.15310.1016/j.matdes.2015.08.153 ↗
7. Mertiny P, Ellyin F, Hothan A. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2004, 64, 1–9.10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00198-210.1016/S0266-3538(03)00198-2 ↗
8. Mertiny P, Gold A. Polym. Test. 2007, 26, 172–179.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.09.00910.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.09.009 ↗
9. Tarakcioglu N, Gemi L, Yapici A. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2005, 65, 703–708.10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.10.00210.1016/j.compscitech.2004.10.002 ↗
10. Tarakcioglu N, Samanci A, Arikan H, Akdemir A. Compos. Struct. 2007, 80, 207–211.10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.05.01510.1016/j.compstruct.2006.05.015 ↗
11. Samanci A, Avci A, Tarakcioglu N, Sahin OS. J. Mater. Sci. 2008, 43, 5569–5573.10.1007/s10853-008-2820-x10.1007/s10853-008-2820-x ↗
12. Samanci A, Tarakcioglu N, Akdemir A. J. Compos. Mater. 2012, 46, 1041–1050.10.1177/002199831141494510.1177/0021998311414945 ↗
13. Uyaner M, Kara M, Şahin A. Composites, Part B 2014, 61, 358–364.10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.06.03910.1016/j.compositesb.2013.06.039 ↗
14. Gemi L, Tarakcioglu N, Akdemir A, Şahin OS. Mater. Des. 2009, 30, 4293–4298.10.1016/j.matdes.2009.04.02510.1016/j.matdes.2009.04.025 ↗
15. Meijer G, Ellyin F. Composites, Part A 2008, 39, 555–564.10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.11.00210.1016/j.compositesa.2007.11.002 ↗
16. Gargiulo C, Marchetti M, Rizzo A. Acta Astronaut. 1996, 39, 355–368.10.1016/S0094-5765(96)00081-110.1016/S0094-5765(96)00081-1 ↗
17. Soden P, Kitching R, Tse PC, Tsavalas Y, Hinton MJ. Compos. Sci. Technol. 1993, 46, 363–378.10.1016/0266-3538(93)90182-G10.1016/0266-3538(93)90182-G ↗
18. Schwencke HF. J. Vinyl Technol. 1989, 11, 28–32.10.1002/vnl.73011010810.1002/vnl.730110108 ↗
19. Schwencke HF, De Ruyter van Stevenick AW. Shell Publication: Belgium, 1968, 68–11.
20. Assaleh TA, Almagguz LA. Adv. Mater. Res.2014, 974, 188–194.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.974.18810.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.974.188 ↗
21. Abdul Majid MS, Assaleh TA, Gibson AG, Hale JM, Fahrer A, Rookus CAP, Hekman M. Composites, Part A 2011, 42, 1500–1508.10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.07.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2011.07.001 ↗
22. Abdul Majid MS, Afendi M, Daud R, Gibson AG, Hekman M. Adv. Mater. Res. 2013, 795, 424–428.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.795.42410.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.795.424 ↗
23. Abdul Majid MS, Gibson AG, Hekman M, Afendi M, Amin NAM. Plast. Rubber Compos. 2014, 43, 290–299.10.1179/1743289814Y.000000010110.1179/1743289814Y.0000000101 ↗