journal article·2015-07-01Open access

Investigation of toughening behavior of epoxy resin by reinforcement of depolymerized latex rubber

Mayank Agarwal, Mohamand Arif, Ankita Bisht, Vinay K. Singh, Sunanda Biswas

Abstract

Abstract An epoxy resin (EP) matrix has been modified with depolymerized natural rubber (DNR). The 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 wt% DNR-filled epoxy were used for the present investigation. The primary aim of this development is to scrutinize the mechanical properties of such cured epoxy filled with DNR. When the rubber content was low, the mechanical strength was low and the free volume of DNR in epoxy matrix was less. With the increase in rubber content, the free volume of rubber in the composite increases and the mechanical strength increases; however, after a specific weight percentage of rubber, if we increase the amount of rubber, the mechanical strength decreases and the free volume of rubber in the composite increases quickly, but with the increase in DNR weight percentage in epoxy matrix, the hardness decreases. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) results justified the results obtained from the mechanical tests.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Technology, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar-263 145, Uttarakhand, India

References (13)

Show source-provided references
1. Huang J, Kinloch AJ. J. Mater. Sci. 1992, 27, 2753–2762.10.1007/BF00540702 ↗
2. Huang J, Kinloch AJ. J. Mater. Sci. 1992, 27, 2763–2769.10.1007/BF00540703 ↗
3. Guild FJ, Kinloch AJ. J. Mater. Sci. 1995, 30, 1689–1697.10.1007/BF00351597 ↗
4. Barcia FL, Amaral TP, Soares BG. Polymer 2003, 44, 5811–5819.10.1016/S0032-3861(03)00537-810.1016/S0032-3861(03)00537-8 ↗
5. Shukla SK, Srivastava D. Polym. Sci. 2006, 100, 1802–1806.10.1002/app.23077 ↗
6. Chikhi N, Fellahi S, Bakar M. Eur. Polym. J. 2002, 38, 251–264.10.1016/S0014-3057(01)00194-X ↗
7. Thomas R, Ding Y, He Y, Yang L, Moldenaers P, Yang W, Czigany T, Thomas S. Polymer 2008, 49, 278–294.10.1016/j.polymer.2007.11.03010.1016/j.polymer.2007.11.030 ↗
8. Saadati P, Baharvand H, Rahimi A, Morshedian J. Iranian Polym. 2005, 14, 637–646.
9. Seluga U, Kurzeja L, Galina H. Polym. Bull. 2008, 60, 555–567.10.1007/s00289-008-0889-7 ↗
10. Singh VK, Gope PC. J. Reinforced Plast. Compos. 2010, 29, 2450–2468.10.1177/0731684409355722 ↗
11. Okwu UN, Akinlabi AK. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2007, 106, 1291–1293.10.1002/app.26560 ↗
12. Vitaly R, Eduardo A. Food Chem. 2005, 92, 235–254.10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.08.004 ↗
13. Tanaka Y, Sakaki T, Kawasaki A, Hayashi M, Kanamaru K, Shibata K. US Patent 5,1999,856,600.