Preparation and mechanical properties of the 2.5D carbon glass hybrid woven composite materials
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The 2.5D carbon glass hybrid woven composite (CGHWC) is currently being utilized as a protective material for the external cables of solid rockets due to its extensive advantages in terms of structural load-bearing and integrated thermal insulation. This study reveals that 2.5D hybrid woven composites, prepared using T300 and T800, exhibit improved compression and tensile properties, respectively. T300 and T800 carbon fibers are preferred for the preparation of 2.5D CGHWC, with a volume fraction of carbon fibers along the weft yarn ranging from 20 to 60%. As the proportion of carbon fibers increases, the weft tensile and compressive strength of the composite material progressively improve, resulting in a maximum increase of 67% in tensile strength and 52% in compressive strength. The optimal volume fraction of carbon fibers was found to be 40%. The performance retention of low-cost hybrid composite materials was investigated, and it was found that even when the cost of carbon fibers decreased by 87.5%, the mechanical properties could still be maintained at above 85%. This article has expanded the mechanical performance database of hybrid composite materials, providing data support and theoretical foundation for the large-scale engineering application of composite materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Rocket and propulsion systems research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Beijing System Design Institute of Mechanical – Electrical Engineering , Beijing , 100871 , China
The Fourth Academy of China Aerospace Science & Industry Corp , Beijing , 102308 , China
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Mulligan JC, Colvin DP, Bryant YG. Microencapsulated phase-change material suspensions for heat transfer in spacecraft thermal systems. J Spacecr Rocket. 2012;33(2):278–84. 10.2514/3.26753.10.2514/3.26753 ↗
2. Fabignon Y, Dupays J, Avalon G, Vuillot F, Lupoglazoff N, Casalis G, et al. Instabilities and pressure oscillations in solid rocket motors. Aerosp Sci Technol. 2003;7(3):191–200. 10.1016/S1270-9638(02)01194-X.10.1016/S1270-9638(02)01194-X ↗
3. Katzman HA, Mallon JJ, Barry WT. Polyarylacetylene–matrix composites for solid rocket motor components. J Adv Mater. 1995;26(3):21–7. 10.1016/0142-1123(95)98943-W.
4. Li KZ, Shen XT, Li HJ, Zhang SY, Feng T, Zhang LL. Ablation of the carbon/carbon composite nozzle-throats in a small solid rocket motor. Carbon. 2011;49(4):1208–15. 10.1016/j.carbon.2010.11.037.10.1016/j.carbon.2010.11.037 ↗
5. Ferraiuolo M, Manca O. Heat transfer in a multi-layered thermal protection system under aerodynamic heating. Int J Therm Sci. 2012;53:56–70. 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2011.10.019.10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2011.10.019 ↗
6. Gongnan X, Wang Q, Sunden B. Thermomechanical optimization of lightweight thermal protection system under aerodynamic heating. Appl Therm Eng. 2013;2:1–10. 10.1016/j. applthermaleng. 2013.06.002.
7. Navazi HM, Haddadpour H. Nonlinear aero-thermoelastic analysis of homogeneous and functionally graded plates in supersonic airflow using coupled models. Compos Struct. 2011;93(10):2554–65. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.04.018.10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.04.018 ↗
8. Wu DF, Wu S, Wang YW, Gao ZT, Yang JL. Fast and high precision thermoelectric potential – temperature conversion method for aerodynamic heating control systems. Adv Mater Res. 2013;694–697:955–60. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.694-697.955.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.694-697.955 ↗
9. Yu HN, Longana ML, Jalalvand M. Pseudo-ductility in intermingled carbon/glass hybrid composites with highly aligned discontinuous fibres. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2015;73A:35–44.10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.02.014 ↗
10. Mohamed MH, Wetzel KK. 3D woven carbon/glass hybrid spar cap for wind turbine rotor blade. J Sol Energy Eng. 2006;128(4):562–73. 10.1115/1.2349543.10.1115/1.2349543 ↗
11. Zhao Y, Song J, Wen W, Cui H, Li C, Liu S. Thermo-mechanical behaviors of 2.5D shallow straight-link-shaped woven composites under the warp direction fatigue loading at room and elevated temperatures. Compos Struct. 2022;289:115489.10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115489 ↗
12. Song J, Wen W, Cui H. Experimental and numerical investigation of mechanical behaviors of 2.5D woven composites at ambient and un-ambient temperatures. Compos Struct. 2018;201:699–720.10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.054 ↗
13. Dang MG, Li DS, Jiang L. Temperature effects on mechanical response and failure mechanism of 3D angle-interlock woven carbon/epoxy composites. Compos Commun. 2020;18:37–42.10.1016/j.coco.2020.01.001 ↗
14. Hengsadeekul T, Nimityongskul P. Appropriate technology for low-cost housing by using precast vetiver grass-clay composite. J Ferrocem. 2005;35(3):628–40. 0125-1759(2005)35:3.
15. Hallal A, Younes R, Fardoun F. Improved analytical model to predict the effective elastic properties of a 2.5D interlock woven fabric composite. Compos Struct. 2012;94(10):3009–28. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.03.019.10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.03.019 ↗
16. Chen W, Yu Y, Li P. Effect of new epoxy matrix for T800 carbon fiber/epoxy filament wound composites. Compos Sci Technol. 2007;67(11–12):2261–70. 10.1016/j.compscitech. 2007.01.026.10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.01.026 ↗
17. Sheng Y, Zhang C, Xu Y, Lu C, Wu G, Wu Z, et al. Investigation of PAN-based carbon fiber microstructure by 2D-SAXS. Carbon. 2010;48(1):316. 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.09.025.10.1016/j.carbon.2009.09.025 ↗
18. Opelt CV, Souza CSR, Marlet JMF, Cândido GM, Rezende MC. Compression failure modes of carbon fiber fabric scraps/epoxy laminates. Adv Mater Res. 2016;1135:52–61. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1135.52.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1135.52 ↗
19. Willows ML. An energy based damage mechanics approach to modelling impact onto woven composite materials: Part II. Experimental and numerical results. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2007;38a(1):540–54.10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.02.023 ↗
20. Radulovi J. Hybrid filament-wound materials: tensile characteristics of (aramide fiber/glass fiber)-epoxy resins composite and (carbon fibers/glass fiber)-epoxy resins composites. Sci Tech Rev. 2020;70(1):36–46. 10.5937/STR2001036R.10.5937/str2001036R ↗
21. Xu L, Fei BQ, Ma SH, Hui L, Huang GD. Tensile and compress property of composite laminate in hygrothermal environment. Cailiao Gongcheng/J Mater Eng. 2018;46(3):124–30. 10.11868/j.issn.1001-4381.2016.000632.
22. Harper JF, Michiels SJ. The behaviour of polyphenylene sulphide carbon/glass hybrid composites under compressive loading. Key Eng Mater. 1998;144:17–26. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.144.17.10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.144.17 ↗
23. Ding YQ, Yan Y, Mcilhagger R, Brown D. Comparison of the fatigue behaviour of 2-D and 3-D woven fabric reinforced composites – ScienceDirect. J Mater Process Technol. 1995;55(3–4):171–7. 10.1016/0924-0136(95)01950-2.10.1016/0924-0136(95)01950-2 ↗
24. Song J, Cui H. Elevated temperature fatigue and failure mechanism of 2.5D T300/QY8911-IV woven composites[C]. The 7th International Conference (ICCM 2016) on Computational Methods. Berkeley, CA, USA; 2016.