Energy absorption rate of composite tube as a function of stacking sequence using finite element method
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Numerical investigations were performed on a series of laminated composites when subjected to dynamic loadings, in order to determine their energy absorption rate and dissipating energy during impact. The details of numerical modeling, contact analysis, material parameters, and failure criteria were explained and discussed. We aimed to determine the energy absorption rate of various quasi-isotropic lay-ups when subjected to the dynamic loadings, and found that energy dissipation rate varied depending on stacking sequence. In this investigation, we studied how the energy absorption rate and the peak impact load change as a result of changing stacking sequence, with all stacking sequences being quasi-isotropic. Using a constant impacting mass and varied impacting speeds, we found that stacking sequence can significantly control the energy transfer rate or energy absorption rate under dynamic load condition.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Cellular and Composite Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 2K3, Canada
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. Thornton PH. J. Compos. Mater. 1979, 13, 247–262.10.1177/00219983790130030810.1177/002199837901300308 ↗
2. Hull D. Compos. Sci. Technol. 1991, 40, 377–421.10.1016/0266-3538(91)90031-J10.1016/0266-3538(91)90031-J ↗
3. Farley GL, Jones RM. J. Compos. Mater. 1992, 26, 37–50.10.1177/00219983920260010310.1177/002199839202600103 ↗
4. Mamalis AG, Robinson M, Manolakos DE, Demosthenous GA, Ioannidis MB, Carruthers J. Compos. Struct. 1997, 37, 109–134.10.1016/S0263-8223(97)80005-010.1016/S0263-8223(97)80005-0 ↗
5. Schultz MR, Hyer MW. J. Compos. Mater. 2001, 35, 1747–1761.10.1177/00219980177266152410.1177/002199801772661524 ↗
6. Mamalis AG, Manolakos DE, Ioannidis MB, Papapostolou DP. Compos. Struct. 2006, 74, 213–225.10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.04.00610.1016/j.compstruct.2005.04.006 ↗
7. Han H, Taheri F, Pegg N, Lu Y. Compos. Struct. 2007, 80, 253–264.10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.05.01210.1016/j.compstruct.2006.05.012 ↗
8. McGregor CJ, Vaziri R, Poursartip A, Xiao X. Compos. Part A– Appl. Sci. 2007, 38, 2247–2259.10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.10.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2006.10.007 ↗
9. El-Hage H, Mallick PK, Zamani N. Int. J. Crashworthiness. 2005, 10, 183–195.10.1533/ijcr.2005.033710.1533/ijcr.2005.0337 ↗
10. Belytschko T, Lin J, Tsay CS. Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 1984, 42, 225–251.10.1016/0045-7825(84)90026-410.1016/0045-7825(84)90026-4 ↗
11. Hallquist J. LS-DYNA Theoretical Manual, Version 971, Livermore Software Technology Corp., Livermore, CA, 2007.
12. Flanagan DP, Belytschko T. Int. J. Numer. Meths. Eng. 1981, 17, 679–706.10.1002/nme.162017050410.1002/nme.1620170504 ↗
13. LS-DYNA Keyword User’s Manual, Version 971, Volumes I and II, Livermore Software Technology Corp., Livermore, CA, 2007.
14. Tsai SW, Wu EM. J. Compos. Mater. 1971, 5, 55–80.10.1177/002199837100500106
15. Chang F, Chang K. J. Compos. Mater. 1987, 21, 809–833.10.1177/00219983870210090310.1177/002199838702100903 ↗
16. Hashin Z. J. Compos. Mater. 1980, 47, 329–334.10.1115/1.315366410.1115/1.3153664 ↗
17. Naik NK, Nemani B. Compos. Struc. 2001, 52, 167–172.10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00164-110.1016/S0263-8223(00)00164-1 ↗