State-of-the-art review on the influence of crumb rubber on the strength, durability, and morphological properties of concrete
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Using crumb rubber (CR) from end-of-life tyres in concrete offers a practical way to reduce environmental waste while enhancing specific performance characteristics. This review brings together current findings on how CR affects the fresh properties, strength, durability, and microstructure of concrete. It explains how untreated rubber often reduces compressive strength, especially at higher replacement levels, due to poor bonding and internal voids. However, this performance drop can be significantly reduced through surface treatments like alkali washing and the use of supplementary cementitious materials. These combinations help restore strength, improve resistance to chloride attack and freeze–thaw cycles, and lower permeability. Microstructural studies show that refining particle size and improving the rubber–cement interface lead to a denser and more cohesive matrix. A classification system is proposed to guide practical applications based on the amount of rubber used and the required mechanical and durability properties. When properly designed, rubberized concrete can reduce embodied carbon by up to 25% and eliminate the need for natural aggregates in many applications. The review also outlines areas that need further attention, including long-term performance validation, lifecycle modeling, and development of practical mix design standards to support the wider use of rubberized concrete in construction.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology , Bhopal , Madhya Pradesh, 462003 , India
Civil Engineering Department, Punjab Engineering College (Deemed to be University) , Chandigarh , 160012 , India
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Shetty MS. Concrete technology: Theory and practice. New Delhi: S Chand & Co Ltd; 2006.
2. Gambhir ML. Concrete technology. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill Education; 2013.
3. International Energy Agency (IEA). Technology roadmap – Low-carbon transition in the cement industry [Internet]. Paris: IEA; 2018 [cited 2022 Jul 3]. https://www.iea.org/reports/technologyroadmap-low-carbon-transition-in-the-cement-industry.
4. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. Trends in global CO2 emissions: 2015 Report [Internet]. The Hague: PBL
5. 2015 [cited 2022 Jul 3]. https://www.pbl.nl/uploads/default/downloads/pbl-2015-trends-in-global-co2-emisions_2015-report_01803_4.pdf.
6. Santhanam M, Jain S, Bhattacherjee S. Versatile concrete with limestone calcined clay cement. Indian Concr J. 2023 Sep;97(9):7–17.
7. Lehner P, Hrabová K. Evaluation of degradation and mechanical parameters and sustainability indicators of zeolite concretes. Constr Build Mater. 2023;371:130791. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130791.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130791 ↗
8. Islam MMU, Li J, Roychand R, Saberian M. Microstructure, thermal conductivity and carbonation resistance properties of sustainable structural lightweight concrete incorporating 100% coarser rubber particles. Constr Build Mater. 2023;408:133658.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133658 ↗
9. Fareghian M, Afrazi M, Fakhimi A. Soil reinforcement by waste tire textile fibers: Small-scale experimental tests. J Mater Civ Eng. 2023;35(2):04022402. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004574.10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004574 ↗
10. Zeybek A, Eyin M. Experimental study on liquefaction characteristics of saturated sands mixed with fly ash and tire crumb rubber. Sustainability. 2023;15(4):2960. 10.3390/su15042960.10.3390/su15042960 ↗
11. Hu Y, Yu X, Ren J, Zeng Z, Qian Q. Waste tire valorization: Advanced technologies, process simulation, system optimization, and sustainability. Sci Total Environ. 2024;942:173561. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173561.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173561 ↗
12. Hu Y, Man Y, Shi T, Zhou J, Zeng Z, Ren J. Fuel composition forecasting for waste tires pyrolysis process based on machine learning methods. Fuel. 2024;362:130789. 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.130789.10.1016/j.fuel.2023.130789 ↗
13. Contec. Tire waste statistics: All you need to know [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Jun 11]. https://contec.tech/tire-waste-statistics-need-to-know/.
14. Wang K, Shan T, Li B, Zheng Y, Xu H, Wang C, et al. Study on pyrolysis characteristics, kinetics and thermodynamics of waste tires catalytic pyrolysis with low-cost catalysts. Fuel. 2024;356:129644. 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.129644.10.1016/j.fuel.2023.129644 ↗
15. Shariati M, Afrazi M, Kamyab H, Rouhanifar S, Toghroli E, Safa M, et al. A state of the art review on geotechnical reinforcement with end life tires. Glob J Environ Sci Manage. 2024;10(1):385–404. 10.22034/gjesm.2024.01.24.
16. Material Recycling Association of India. Rubber & tyre [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Dec 23]. https://mrai.org.in/theindustry/rubber.html.
17. Rubber Manufacturers Association (RMA). Scrap tire markets [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2022 Oct 8]. https://cmshredders.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/US_STMarket2013.pdf.
18. Mongabay India. Explainer: Why are waste tyres a growing environmental concern? [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Jun 8]. https://india.mongabay.com/2024/02/explainer-whyare-waste-tyres-a-growing-environmental-concern/.
19. Daghistani F, Baghbani A, Abuel Naga H, Shirani Faradonbeh R. Internal friction angle of cohesionless binary mixture sand–granular rubber using experimental study and machine learning. Geosciences. 2023;13(7):197. 10.3390/geosciences13070197.10.3390/geosciences13070197 ↗
20. Zhu X, Jiang Z. Reuse of waste rubber in pervious concrete: Experiment and DEM simulation. J Build Eng. 2023;71:106452. 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106452.10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106452 ↗
21. Wu M, Tian W, He J, Liu F, Yang J. Seismic isolation effect of rubber-sand mixture cushion under different site classes based on a simplified analysis model. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2023;166:107738. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107738.10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107738 ↗
22. Liu L, Wang C, Liang Q, Chen F, Zhou X. A state-of-the-art review of rubber modified cement-based materials: Cement stabilized base. J Clean Prod. 2023;392:136270. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136270.10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136270 ↗
23. Ahmed I. Laboratory study on properties of rubber-soils. Report No.: FHWA/IN/JHRP-93/04. West Lafayette (IN): Joint Highway Research Project, Indiana Department of Transportation and Purdue University; 1993.
24. Safa M, Sari PA, Shariati M, Suhatril M, Trung NT, Wakil K, et al. Development of neuro-fuzzy and neuro-bee predictive models for prediction of the safety factor of eco-protection slopes. Phys A Stat Mech Appl. 2020;550:124046. 10.1016/j.physa.2019.124046.10.1016/j.physa.2019.124046 ↗
25. Mhaya AM, Huseien GF, Faridmehr I, Abidin ARZ, Alyousef R, Ismail M. Evaluating mechanical properties and impact resistance of modified concrete containing ground blast furnace slag and discarded rubber tire crumbs. Constr Build Mater. 2021;295:123603. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123603.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123603 ↗
26. Mansouri I, Safa M, Ibrahim Z, Kisi O, Tahir MM, Baharom S, et al. Strength prediction of rotary brace damper using MLR and MARS. Struct Eng Mech. 2016;60(3):471–88. 10.12989/sem.2016.60.3.471.10.12989/sem.2016.60.3.471 ↗
27. Roy C, Labrecque B, de Caumia B. Recycling of scrap tires to oil and carbon black by vacuum pyrolysis. Resour Conserv Recycl. 1990;4(3):203–13. 10.1016/0921-3449(90)90002-L.10.1016/0921-3449(90)90002-L ↗
28. Abbas-Abadi MS, Kusenberg M, Shirazi HM, Goshayeshi B, Van Geem KM. Towards full recyclability of end-of-life tires: Challenges and opportunities. J Clean Prod. 2022;374:134036. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134036.10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134036 ↗
29. Bala A, Gupta S. Thermal resistivity, sound absorption and vibration damping of concrete composite doped with waste tire rubber: A review. Constr Build Mater. 2021;299:123939. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123939.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123939 ↗
30. Roychand R, Gravina RJ, Zhuge Y, Ma X, Youssf O, Mills JE. A comprehensive review on the mechanical properties of waste tire rubber concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2020;237:117651. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117651.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117651 ↗
31. Arefnia A, Momeni E, Armaghani DJ, Kassim KA, Ahmad K. Effect of tire derived aggregate on maximum dry density of kaolin. J Teknol. 2013;66(1):19–23. 10.11113/jt.v66.1704.10.11113/jt.v66.1704 ↗
32. Nikitas G, Bhattacharya S. Experimental study on sand–tire chip mixture foundations acting as a soil liquefaction countermeasure. Bull Earthq Eng. 2023;21:4037–63. 10.1007/s10518-023-01667-1.10.1007/s10518-023-01667-1 ↗
33. Mhaya AM, Baghban MH, Faridmehr I, Huseien GF, Abidin ARZ, Ismail M. Performance evaluation of modified rubberized concrete exposed to aggressive environments. Materials (Basel). 2021;14:1900. 10.3390/ma14081900.10.3390/ma14081900 ↗
34. Cui S, Zhou C, Zhang J. Experimental investigations on the state-dependent thermal conductivity of sand–rubber mixtures. J Mater Civ Eng. 2022;34(3):04022005. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004133.10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004133 ↗
35. Global Recycling. Recycled construction waste in Europe [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2022 Feb 24]. https://global-recycling.info/archives/2964.
36. Global Recycling. The magazine for business opportunities & international markets [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2022 Feb 24]. https://global-recycling.info/.
37. Veena U, James N. Natural rubber latex treatment of sand: A novel remediation technique for soil liquefaction. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2023;165:107661. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107661.10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107661 ↗
38. Bisht K, Ramana PV. Evaluation of mechanical and durability properties of crumb rubber concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2017;155:811–7. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.131.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.131 ↗
39. Eldin NN, Senouci AB. Measurement and prediction of the strength of rubberized concrete. Cem Concr Compos. 1994;16(4):287–98. 10.1016/0958-9465(94)90041-8.10.1016/0958-9465(94)90041-8 ↗
40. Segre N, Joekes I. Use of tire rubber particles as addition to cement paste. Cem Concr Res. 2000;30(9):1421–5. 10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00373-2.10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00373-2 ↗
41. Albano C, Camacho N, Reyes J, Feliu JL, Hernández M. Influence of scrap rubber addition to Portland I concrete composites: Destructive and non-destructive testing. Compos Struct. 2005;71(3–4):439–46. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.09.037.10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.09.037 ↗
42. Gesoğlu M, Güneyisi E, Khoshnaw G, İpek S. Investigating properties of pervious concretes containing waste tire rubbers. Constr Build Mater. 2014;63:206–13. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.046.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.046 ↗
43. Azunna SU, Aziz FNAA, Rashid RSM, Bakar NBA. Review on the characteristic properties of crumb rubber concrete. Clean Mater. 2024;12:100237. 10.1016/j.clema.2024.100237.10.1016/j.clema.2024.100237 ↗
44. Pehlken A, Essadiqi E. Scrap tire recycling in Canada. Ottawa: CANMET Materials Technology Laboratory; 2005. Report No.: 8. 10.13140/2.1.1941.8400.
45. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Markets for scrap tires [Internet]. 1991 [cited 2022 Jun 29]. https://archive.epa.gov/epawaste/conserve/materials/tires/web/pdf/tires.pdf.
46. Tian Y, Senetakis K. Influence of creep on the small-strain stiffness of sand–rubber mixtures. Géotechnique. 2022;72(10):899–910.10.1680/jgeot.20.P.208 ↗
47. Valente M, Sambucci M, Chougan M, Ghaffar SH. Composite alkali-activated materials with waste tire rubber designed for additive manufacturing: an eco-sustainable and energy saving approach. J Mater Res Technol. 2023;24:3098–117. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.03.213.10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.03.213 ↗
48. Ferdous W, Manalo A, Siddique R, Mendis P, Zhuge Y, Wong HS, et al. Recycling of landfill wastes (tyres, plastics and glass) in construction – A review on global waste generation, performance, application and future opportunities. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2021;173:105745. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105745.10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105745 ↗
49. Amin H, Khan BJ, Ahmad M, Hakamy A, Sikandar MA, Sabri MMS. Evaluation of shear strength parameters of sustainable utilization of scrap tires derived geo-materials for civil engineering applications. Front Earth Sci. 2023;11:1116169. 10.3389/feart.2023.1116169.10.3389/feart.2023.1116169 ↗
50. Sakr MA, Basha AM. Uses of waste tires in geotechnical application – a review. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Structural and Geotechnical Engineering (ICASGE’19). Hurghada, Egypt; 2019 Mar 25–28. p. 1–9.
51. Martínez JD, Puy N, Murillo R, García T, Navarro MV, Mastral AM. Waste tyre pyrolysis – A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2013;23:179–213. 10.1016/j.rser.2013.02.038.10.1016/j.rser.2013.02.038 ↗
52. Edil TB, Bosscher PJ. Development of engineering criteria for shredded waste tires in highway applications. Final report [Internet]. 1992 [cited 2024 Jun 5]. https://rmrc.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Edil-Bosscher-1992.pdf.
53. Eldin NN, Senouci AB. Rubber‐tire particles as concrete aggregate. J Mater Civ Eng. 1993 Nov;5(4):478–96. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1993)5:4(478).10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1993)5:4(478) ↗
54. Zakerzadeh M, Shahbodagh B, Ng J, Khalili N. The use of waste tyre rubber in Stone Mastic Asphalt mixtures: A critical review. Constr Build Mater. 2024;418:135420. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135420.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135420 ↗
55. Pour AE, Afrazi M, Golshani A. Experimental study of the effect of length and angle of cross-cracks on tensile strength of rock-like material. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng. 2022;46:4543–56. 10.1007/s40996-022-00891-0.10.1007/s40996-022-00891-0 ↗
56. Chiaro G, Tasalloti A, Banasiak L, Palermo A, Granello G, Rees S. Sustainable recycling of end-of-life tyres in civil (geotechnical) engineering applications: turning issues into opportunities in the New Zealand context. Proc Inst Civ Eng Waste Resour Manag. 2020;99:38–47.
57. Garga V, O’Shaughnessy V. Tire-reinforced earthfill. Part 1: Construction of a test fill, performance, and retaining wall design. Can Geotech J. 2000;37(1):75–96. 10.1139/cgj-37-1-75.10.1139/t99-084 ↗
58. O’Shaughnessy V, Garga VK. Tire-reinforced earthfill. Part 2: Pull-out behaviour and reinforced slope design. Can Geotech J. 2000;37(1):97–116. 10.1139/t99-085.10.1139/t99-085 ↗
59. Tweedie JJ, Humphrey DN, Sandford TC. Tire shreds as lightweight retaining wall backfill: Active conditions. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. 1998 Nov;124(11):1061–70. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:11(1061).10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:11(1061) ↗
60. Bernal A, Lovell CW, Salgado R. Laboratory study on the use of tire shreds and rubber-sand in backfills and reinforced soil applications. Final report. Report No.: FHWA/IN/JHRP-96/12. West Lafayette (IN): Joint Highway Research Project, Purdue University; 1996.10.5703/1288284313259 ↗
61. Zornberg JG, Cabral AR, Viratjandr C. Behaviour of tire shred–sand mixtures. Can Geotech J. 2004 Apr;41(2):227–41. 10.1139/t03-086.10.1139/t03-086 ↗
62. Gerges NN, Issa CA, Fawaz SA. Rubber concrete: Mechanical and dynamical properties. Case Stud Constr Mater. 2018;9:e00184. 10.1016/j.cscm.2018.e00184.10.1016/j.cscm.2018.e00184 ↗
63. Oikonomou N, Mavridou S. Improvement of chloride ion penetration resistance in cement mortars modified with rubber from worn automobile tires. Cem Concr Compos. 2009;31(6):403–7. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.04.004.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.04.004 ↗
64. Zhang P, Wang X, Wang J, Zhang T. Workability and durability of concrete incorporating waste tire rubber: A review. J Renew Mater. 2022;11(2):745–76. 10.32604/jrm.2022.022846.10.32604/jrm.2022.022846 ↗
65. De Maeijer K, Craeye B, Blom J, Bervoets L. Crumb rubber in concrete—The barriers for application in the construction industry. Infrastructures. 2021;6(8):116. 10.3390/infrastructures6080116.10.3390/infrastructures6080116 ↗
66. Akbar M, Hussain Z, Huali P, Imran M, Thomas BS. Impact of waste crumb rubber on concrete performance incorporating silica fume and fly ash to make a sustainable low carbon concrete. Struct Eng Mech. 2023;85(2):275–87. 10.12989/sem.2023.85.2.2757.
67. Toutanji HA. The use of rubber tire particles in concrete to replace mineral aggregates. Cem Concr Compos. 1996;18(2):135–9. 10.1016/0958-9465(95)00010-0.10.1016/0958-9465(95)00010-0 ↗
68. Bravo M, Brito J. Concrete made with used tyre aggregate: Durability-related performance. J Clean Prod. 2012;25:42–50. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.066.10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.066 ↗
69. Gravina RJ, Xie T. Toward the development of sustainable concrete with crumb rubber: Design-oriented models, life-cycle assessment and a site application. Constr Build Mater. 2022;315:125565. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125565.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125565 ↗
70. Thomas BS, Gupta RC. Long term behaviour of cement concrete containing discarded tire rubber. J Clean Prod. 2015;102:78–87. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.072.10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.072 ↗
71. Hisbani N, Shafiq N, Shams MA, Farhan SA, Zahid M. Properties of concrete containing crumb rubber as partial replacement of fine aggregate—A review. Hybrid Adv. 2025;10:100481. 10.1016/j.hybadv.2025.100481.10.1016/j.hybadv.2025.100481 ↗
72. Shen W, Shan L, Zhang T, Ma H, Cai Z, Shi H. Investigation on polymer–rubber aggregate modified porous concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2013;38:667–74. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.09.006.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.09.006 ↗
73. Uygunoğlu T, Topçu İB. The role of scrap rubber particles on the drying shrinkage and mechanical properties of self-consolidating mortars. Constr Build Mater. 2010;24(7):1141–50. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.12.027.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.12.027 ↗
74. Khaloo AR, Dehestani M, Rahmatabadi P. Mechanical properties of concrete containing a high volume of tire–rubber particles. Waste Manag. 2008;28(12):2472–82. 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.01.015.10.1016/j.wasman.2008.01.015 ↗
75. Mohammed BS, Hossain KMA, Ting ESJ, Wong G, Abdullahi M. Properties of crumb rubber hollow concrete block. J Clean Prod. 2012;23(1):57–67. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.035.10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.035 ↗
76. Aiello MA, Leuzzi F. Waste tyre rubberized concrete: Properties at fresh and hardened state. Waste Manag. 2010;30(8–9):1696–704. 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.02.005.10.1016/j.wasman.2010.02.005 ↗
77. Agrawal D, Waghe U, Ansari K, Dighade R, Amran M, Qader DN, et al. Experimental effect of pre-treatment of rubber fibers on mechanical properties of rubberized concrete. J Mater Res Technol. 2023;23:791–807. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.01.027.10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.01.027 ↗
78. Kevin B, Sarker PK, Madhavan MK. Performance assessment and microstructural characterization of combined surface, chemical and polymer treated crumb rubber concrete. Sci Rep. 2025;15:15853. 10.1038/s41598-025-97189-8.10.1038/s41598-025-97189-8 ↗
79. Celestino R, Aboelkheir MG. Recovery of tire rubber waste after UV treatment as a recycled aggregate in cementitious composites. Mater Today Proc. 2022;58(Pt 4):1476–9. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.552.10.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.552 ↗
80. Kilani AJ, Ikotun BD, Abdulwahab R. Effect of crumb rubber on concrete’s and mortar’s structural properties: A review. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng. 2025;49:1037–67. 10.1007/s40996-024-01647-8.10.1007/s40996-025-01768-8 ↗
81. Benazzouk A, Douzane O, Langlet T, Mezreb K, Roucoult JM, Quéneudec M. Physico-mechanical properties and water absorption of cement composite containing shredded rubber wastes. Cem Concr Compos. 2007;29(10):732–40. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2007.07.001.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2007.07.001 ↗
82. Gesoğlu M, Güneyisi E. Permeability properties of self-compacting rubberized concretes. Constr Build Mater. 2011;25(8):3319–26. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.03.021.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.03.021 ↗
83. Sidhu AS, Siddique R. Durability assessment of sustainable metakaolin-based high strength concrete incorporating crumb tire rubber. J Build Eng. 2023;72:106660. 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106660.10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106660 ↗
84. Xue J, Shinozuka M. Rubberized concrete: A green structural material with enhanced energy-dissipation capability. Constr Build Mater. 2013;42:196–204. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.005.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.005 ↗
85. Al-Tayeb MM, Abu Bakar BH, Ismail H, Akil HM. Effect of partial replacement of sand by recycled fine crumb rubber on the performance of hybrid rubberized-normal concrete under impact load: Experiment and simulation. J Clean Prod. 2013;59:284–9. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.04.026.10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.04.026 ↗
86. Gupta T, Chaudhary S, Sharma RK. Assessment of mechanical and durability properties of concrete containing waste rubber tire as fine aggregate. Constr Build Mater. 2014;73:562–74. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.102.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.102 ↗
87. Shen D, Yu Y, Jin Z, Li N. Effects of crumb rubber particles on the evolution of pore structure in steam-cured concrete under freeze-thaw cycles. J Build Eng. 2025;103:112138. 10.1016/j.jobe.2025.112138.10.1016/j.jobe.2025.112138 ↗
88. Kang J, Zhang B, Li G. The abrasion-resistance investigation of rubberized concrete. J Wuhan Univ Technol Mater Sci Ed. 2012;27:10–5. 10.1007/s11595-012-0619-8.10.1007/s11595-012-0619-8 ↗
89. Wang HY, Lin CY, Lee HH. A study of the durability properties of waste tire rubber applied to self-compacting concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2013;41:665–72. 10.101/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.019.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.019 ↗
90. Bisht K, Ramana PV. Waste to resource conversion of crumb rubber for production of sulphuric acid resistant concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2019;194:276–86. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.040.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.040 ↗
91. Islam MMU, Li J, Roychand R, Saberian M. Investigation of durability properties for structural lightweight concrete with discarded vehicle tire rubbers: A study for the complete replacement of conventional coarse aggregates. Constr Build Mater. 2023;369:130634. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130634.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130634 ↗
92. Sanjaya BGV, Appuhamy JMRS, Bandara WMKRTW, Venkatesan S, Gravina RJ. The potential of recovering design strength of rubberized concrete using aqua-thermally treated crumb rubber at lower replacement ratios. Constr Build Mater. 2025;458:139627. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.139627.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.139627 ↗
93. Singaravel DA, Veerapandian P, Rajendran S, Dhairiyasamy R. Enhancing high-performance concrete sustainability: Integration of waste tire rubber for innovation. Sci Rep. 2024;14:4635. 10.1038/s41598-024-55485-9.10.1038/s41598-024-55485-9 ↗
94. Ganjian E, Khorami M, Maghsoudi AA. Scrap-tyre-rubber replacement for aggregate and filler in concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2009;23:1828–36. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.09.020.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.09.020 ↗
95. Loganathan R, Mohammed BS. Properties of rubberized engineered cementitious composites containing nano-silica. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(13):3765. 10.3390/ma14133765.10.3390/ma14133765 ↗
96. Kanagaraj B, Ramkishor SS, Ashutosh, Anand N, Lubloy E. Engineering and sustainability characteristics of concrete blended with waste rubber crumbs as an alternate to conventional coarse aggregate. Clean Waste Syst. 2025;11:100271. 10.1016/j.clwas.2025.100271.10.1016/j.clwas.2025.100271 ↗
97. Fadiel AAM, Abu-Lebdeh T, Munteanu IS, Niculae E, Petrescu FIT. Mechanical properties of rubberized concrete at elevated temperatures. J Compos Sci. 2023;7(7):283. 10.3390/jcs7070283.10.3390/jcs7070283 ↗
98. Zhai S, Hu J, Hai R, Cui L, Zhang Y, Yang L, et al. Investigation on the durability performance and mechanism analysis of modified crumb rubber concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2025;471:140746. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.140746.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.140746 ↗
99. Assaggaf RA, Maslehuddin M, Al-Dulaijan SU, Al-Osta MA, Ali MR, Shameem M. Cost-effective treatment of crumb rubber to improve the properties of crumb-rubber concrete. Case Stud Constr Mater. 2022;16:e00881. 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e00881.10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e00881 ↗
100. Liu Z, Chen X, Wang X, Diao H. Investigation on the dynamic compressive behavior of waste tires rubber-modified self-compacting concrete under multiple impacts loading. J Clean Prod. 2022;336:130289. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130289.10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130289 ↗