journal article·2021-01-01Open access

Cushioning energy absorption of paper corrugation tubes with regular polygonal cross-section under axial static compression

Jianfen Kang, Yanfeng Guo, Yungang Fu, Qiong Li, Yabo Lv

Abstract

Abstract The paper corrugation tube is an innovative kind of energy absorbing structure and shock absorber which can play an important role on the cushioning energy absorption for airdrop equipments and transportation packaging. The deformation characteristics and failure modes of the regular triangle, quadrangle, pentagon and hexagon paper corrugation tubes were comparatively studied by a series of axial static compression experiments, the cushioning energy absorption was evaluated by the seven characteristic parameters ( e.g. initial peak force, mean crush force, total energy absorption, specific energy absorption, crush force efficiency, unit area energy absorption and stroke efficiency), and the influences of tube direction, cross-sectional shape, tube length and compression rate on failure modes and cushioning energy absorption were analyzed and compared. These researches showed that the tubes along X direction only have the accordion deformation mode, yet the tubes along Y direction have four deformation modes including steady state progressive buckling, Euler buckling, angular tear and transverse shear. For the paper corrugation tubes along Y direction, the cross-sectional shape has obvious influence on the cushioning energy absorption of structures, and the specific energy absorption and unit area energy absorption of regular triangle and pentagon tubes are better than those of the tubes with regular quadrilateral and hexagonal cross-section at compression rates of 12 and 48mm/min. The tube length of 150 mm or compression rate of 72 mm/min would cause the increase of contribution proportion of non-ideal deformation mode and the decrease of cushioning properties. The paper corrugation tubes along X direction have more stable and controllable deformation mode, yet the paper corrugation tubes along Y direction have better cushioning energy absorption.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Material Properties and Processing · Cellular and Composite Structures · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Printing, Packaging Engineering and Digital Media Technology , Xi’an University of Technology , Xi’an , Shaanxi Province , China

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Lakes R. Materials with structural hierarchy. Nature 1993;361(11):511–515.10.1038/361511a0 ↗
2. Kooistra GW, Deshpande V, Wadley HNG. Hierarchical corrugated core sandwich panel concepts. Journal of Applied Mechanics 2007;74(1):259–268.10.1115/1.2198243 ↗
3. Hohe J, Becker W. Effective stress-strain relations for two-dimensional cellular sandwich cores: Homogenization, material models, and properties. Applied Mechanics Review 2002;55(1):61–87.10.1115/1.1425394 ↗
4. Kazemahvazi S, Tanner D, Zenkert D. Corrugated all-composite sandwich structures. Part 2: Failure mechanisms and experimental programme. Composites Science and Technology 2009;69:920–925.10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.11.035 ↗
5. Lu TJ, Chen C, Zhu G. Compressive behavior of corrugated board panels. Journal of Composite Materials 2001;35(23):2098–2126.10.1106/G3WA-UFBE-A8W8-WWL0 ↗
6. Krusper A, Isaksson P, Gradin P. Modeling of out-of-plane compression loading of corrugated paper board structures. Engineering Mechanics 2007;133(11):1171–1177.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2007)133:11(1171) ↗
7. Rami HA, Choi J, Wei BS, et al. Refined nonlinear finite element models for corrugated fiberboards. Composite Structures 2009;87(4):321–333.10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.02.001 ↗
8. Talbi N, Batti A, Ayad R, et al. An analytical homogenization model for finite element modeling of corrugated cardboard. Composite Structures 2009;88 (2):280–289.10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.04.008 ↗
9. Sek MA, Kirkpatrick J. Prediction of the cushioning properties of corrugated fiberboard from static and quasi-dynamic compression data. Packaging Technology and Science 1997;10(2):87–94.10.1002/(SICI)1099-1522(199703/04)10:2<87::AID-PTS389>3.0.CO;2-L ↗
10. Sek M, Rouillard V, Tarash H, et al. Enhancement of cushioning performance with paperboard crumple inserts. Packaging Technology and Science 2005;18(5):273–278.10.1002/pts.698 ↗
11. Gao D, Wang ZL, Chen NL, et al. The dynamic modeling of flat compression cushioning made up of B-flute double-wall corrugated fiberboard. Journal of Vibration Engineering 2001;14(2):172–178. (In Chinese)
12. Zhu DP, Zhou SS. Dynamic modeling and response analysis of corrugated paperboard to shock excitation. Mechanical Science and Technology for Aerospace Engineering 2013;32(2):257–262. (In Chinese)
13. Wang DM. Cushioning properties of multi-layer corrugated sandwich structures. Sandwich Structures and Materials 2009;11(1):57–66.10.1177/1099636208100415 ↗
14. Guo YF, Xu WC, Fu YG, et al. Dynamic shock cushioning characteristics and vibration transmissibility of X-PLY corrugated paperboard. Shock and Vibration 2011;18(4):525–535.10.1155/2011/578265 ↗
15. Guo YF, Xu WC, Fu YG, et al. Comparison studies on dynamic packaging properties of corrugated paperboard pads. Journal of Engineering 2010;2(5):378–386.10.4236/eng.2010.25049 ↗
16. Guo YF, Becker W, Fu YG, et al. Package cushioning properties of corrugated paperboard pads with hollow pillars. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Packaging Technology and Science. Wuxi, China; 2014.
17. Kılıçaslan C, Güden M, Odacı İK, et al. The impact responses and the finite element modeling of layered trapezoidal corrugated aluminum core and aluminum sheet interlayer sandwich structures. Materials and Design 2013;46:121–133.10.1016/j.matdes.2012.09.059 ↗
18. Qiu XM, Pan ML, Yu XH, et al. Analysis of the energy absorption properties for tubular structure under axial compression of different failure models. Mechanics in Engineering 2016;38(5):477–492. (In Chinese)
19. Eyvazian A, Habibi MK, Hamouda AM, et al. Axial crushing behavior and energy absorption eflciency of corrugated tubes. Materials and Design 2014;54:1028–1038.10.1016/j.matdes.2013.09.031 ↗
20. Liu ZF, Hao WQ, Xie JM, et al. Axial-impact buckling modes and energy absorption properties of thin-walled corrugated tubes with sinusoidal patterns. Thin-Walled Structures 2015;94:410–423.10.1016/j.tws.2015.05.002 ↗
21. Xiong J, Feng LN, Ghosh R, et al. Fabrication and mechanical behavior of carbon fiber composite sandwich cylindrical shells with corrugated cores. Composite Structures 2015;156:307–319.10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.10.009 ↗
22. Kılıçaslan C. Numerical crushing analysis of aluminum foam-filled corrugated single-and double-circular tubes subjected to axial impact loading. Thin-Walled Structures 2015;96:82–94.10.1016/j.tws.2015.08.009 ↗
23. Wierzbicki T, Abramowicz W. On the Crushing Mechanics of Thin-Walled Structures[J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1983;50(4):727–734.10.1115/1.3167137 ↗