journal article·2016-11-01Open access

The machinability of Al/B 4 C composites produced by hot pressing based on reinforcing the element ratio

Ergün Ekici, Mahmut Gülesin

Abstract

Abstract In this study, the effects of the particle reinforcement ratio on cutting forces and surface roughness were investigated when milling particle-reinforced metal matrix composite (MMCp) produced by hot pressing with different cutting tools. Alumix 123 alloy as the matrix material and B 4 C particles with an average size of 27 μm and 5%, 10% and 15% ratio as reinforcing elements were used for the manufacture of composite materials. The experiments were carried out in dry cutting conditions with four different cutting speeds, constant feed rate and depth of cut. Changes depending on the increased reinforcement ratio in cutting forces and surface roughness values were investigated; the effects of 10% B 4 C reinforced composite on tool wear were also examined. It was observed that cutting forces increased with the increase in cutting speed and particle ratio with carbide cutting tools, and it was seen that the cutting forces on the cutting tools decreased when cutting speed decreased and the cutting forces increased as the reinforcement ratios increased. In addition, with increasing the cutting speed, the surface roughness of the machined surfaces of composite samples increased with the carbide tools, while the cubic boron nitride (CBN) tools have the opposite effect. While it was seen that flank and crater wear occurred on the cemented carbide cutting tools, abrasive, adhesive and other wear mechanism tools in addition to the main wear mechanism, no remarkable flank and crater wear occurred on CBN cutting tools.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Engineering, Department of Industrial Engineering, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, Burslem 17100, Turkey

Faculty of Technology, Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Muthukrishnan N, Murugan M, Rao KP. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2008, 39, 211–218.10.1007/s00170-007-1220-8 ↗
2. Kainer KU. Metal Matrix Composites. Wiley-VCH, Betz-Druck GmbH: Darmstadt, Germany, 2006.10.1002/3527608117 ↗
3. Kevin Chou YR, Liu J. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2005, 200, 1872–1878.10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.08.094 ↗
4. Kök M. Composites Part A 2006, 37, 457–464.10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.05.038 ↗
5. Auradi V, Rajesh GL, Kori SA. Procedia Mater. Sci. 2014, 6, 1068–1076.10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.177 ↗
6. Mohanty RM, Balasubramanian K, Seshadri SK. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2008, 498, 42–52.10.1016/j.msea.2007.11.154 ↗
7. Krishnamurthy L, Sridhara BK, Abdul Budan D. Mater. Manuf. Processes 2007, 22, 903–908.10.1080/10426910701451754 ↗
8. Pramanik A, Zhang LC, Arsecularatne JA. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2006, 46, 1795–1803.10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.11.012 ↗
9. Li X, Seah WKH. Wear 2001, 247, 161–171.10.1016/S0043-1648(00)00524-X ↗
10. Dhanasekar B, Ramamoorthy B. Tribol. Int. 2010, 43, 268–276.10.1016/j.triboint.2009.05.030 ↗
11. Ozben T, Kilickap E, Çakır O. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2008, 198, 220–225.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.06.082 ↗
12. Bhushan RK, Kumar S, Das S. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2010, 50, 459–469.10.1007/s00170-010-2529-2 ↗
13. Ding X, Liew WYH, Liu XD. Wear 2005, 259, 1225–1234.10.1016/j.wear.2005.02.094 ↗
14. Zhang Q, Qiu J, Wang Y, Gu M. J. Mater. Sci. 2007, 42, 5845–5850.10.1007/s10853-006-0851-8 ↗
15. Serdar Karakaş M, Acır A, Übeyli M, Ögel B. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2006, 178, 241–246.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.005 ↗
16. Basheer AC, Dabade UA, Joshi SS, Bhanuprasad VV, Gadre VM. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2008, 197, 439–444.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.04.121 ↗
17. Suresh Kumar Reddy N, Kwang-Sup S, Yang M. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2008, 201, 574–579.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.280 ↗
18. ISO 8688-1 (1989) Tool life testing in milling – part 1: face milling.
19. Quigley Q, Monagohan J, O’Reilly P. J. Mater. Proc. Technol. 1994, 43, 21–36.10.1016/0924-0136(94)90159-7 ↗
20. Karakas MS, Acır A, Ubeyli M, Ogel B. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2006, 178, 241–246.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.005 ↗
21. Kannan S, Kishawy HA, Deiab IM, Surappa MK. J. Manuf. Process. 2006, 8, 67–75.10.1016/S1526-6125(07)00006-0 ↗
22. Kılıckap E, Aksoy M, Inan A. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2005, 164–165, 862–867.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.109 ↗
23. Sun FH, Wu ZY, Zhong JW, Chen M. Key Eng. Mater. 2004, 274–276, 457–462.10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.274-276.457 ↗
24. Toh CK. Mater. Design. 2004, 25, 41–50.10.1016/S0261-3069(03)00160-2 ↗
25. Okada M, Hosokawa A, Tanaka R, Ued T. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2011, 51, 127–132.10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2010.10.007 ↗
26. Şahin Y, Sur G. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2004, 179, 349–355.10.1016/S0257-8972(03)00802-8 ↗
27. Çifçi İ. J. Faculty Eng. Archit. Gazi Univ. 2005, 20, 205–209.
28. Ozben T, Kilickap E, Çakır O. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2008, 198, 220–225.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.06.082 ↗