A comparative study performance of cationic organic montmorillonite prepared by different methods
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In this paper, cationic organic montmorillonites (OMts) were prepared by dry, semi-dry, and wet methods. The structures and properties of these OMts according to the modification methods were studied. By the characterization of XRD, TG-DTA, lipophilicity, and thixotropy, the results showed that cationic OMt prepared by wet method with sufficient surfactants had better properties, including contact angle, swelling capacity, thixotropic loop area, and thermal stability compared with cationic OMt prepared by dry and semi-dry methods. Attention should be paid that with low ratio amount of surfactants used, cationic OMt prepared by the semi-dry method had favorable properties compared with cationic OMt prepared by wet method, and it had the potential to be applied in industrial field due to its environment-friendly and modification efficiency characteristics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Clay minerals and soil interactions · Conducting polymers and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Beijing Key Laboratory of Materials Utilization of Nonmetallic Minerals and Solid Wastes , National Laboratory of Mineral Materials, School of Materials Science and Technology , China University of Geosciences , Beijing , P.R. China
Beijing Key Laboratory of Materials Utilization of Nonmetallic Minerals and Solid Wastes, National Laboratory of Mineral Materials, School of Materials Science and Technology , China University of Geosciences , Beijing 100083 , P.R. China
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Liu R, Frost RL, Martens WN. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2009, 113, 707–713.10.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.08.01910.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.08.019 ↗
2. Soundararajah QY, Karunaratne BSB, Rajapakse RMG. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2009, 113, 850–855.10.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.08.05510.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.08.055 ↗
3. Sinha RS, Okamoto M. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2003, 28, 1539–1641.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2003.08.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2003.08.002 ↗
4. Pradhan DK, Choudhary RNP, Samantaray BK. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2009, 115, 557–561.10.1016/j.matchemphys.2009.01.00810.1016/j.matchemphys.2009.01.008 ↗
5. Tsai TY, Li CH, Chang CH, Cheng WH, Hwang CL, Wu RJ. Adv. Mater. 2005, 17, 1769–1773.10.1002/adma.20040126010.1002/adma.200401260 ↗
6. Beall GW. Appl. Clay Sci. 2003, 24, 11–20.10.1016/j.clay.2003.07.00610.1016/j.clay.2003.07.006 ↗
7. Silva IA, Sousa FKA, Menezes RR, Neves GA, Santana LNL, Ferreira HC. Appl. Clay Sci. 2014, 95, 71–377.10.1016/j.clay.2014.04.021 ↗
8. Isayama M, Nomiyama K, Kunitake T. Adv. Mater. 1996, 8, 641–644.10.1002/adma.1996008080710.1002/adma.19960080807 ↗
9. Chen Y, Ma YL. Mater. Rev. 2009, 23, 432–435.10.1007/s00540-009-0772-1 ↗
10. He HP, Zhou Q, Martens WN, Kloprogge TJ, Yuan P, Xi YF, Zhu JX, Frost RL. Clays Clay Miner. 2006, 54, 689–696.10.1346/CCMN.2006.054060410.1346/CCMN.2006.0540604 ↗
11. Xu CY, Yu X, Fang X. Mult. Util. Miner Res. 1997, 4, 20–24.
12. He HP, Ma Y, Zhu JX, Yuan P, Qing Y. Appl. Clay Sci. 2010, 48, 67–72.10.1016/j.clay.2009.11.02410.1016/j.clay.2009.11.024 ↗
13. Lagaly G. Clay Miner. 1981, 16, 1–21.10.1180/claymin.1981.016.1.0110.1180/claymin.1981.016.1.01 ↗
14. Lee SY, Kim SJ. Colloid Surf. A 2002, 211, 19–26.10.1016/S0927-7757(02)00215-710.1016/S0927-7757(02)00215-7 ↗
15. Xi YF, Frost RL, He HP, Kloprogge T, Bostrom T. Langmuir 2005, 21, 8675–8680.10.1021/la051454i10.1021/la051454i ↗
16. He HP, Frost RL, Bostrom T, Yuan P, Duong L, Yang D, Xi YF, Kloprogge TJ. Appl. Clay Sci. 2006, 31, 262–271.10.1016/j.clay.2005.10.01110.1016/j.clay.2005.10.011 ↗
17. Zidelkheir B, Abdelgoad M. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2008, 94, 181–187.10.1007/s10973-008-9053-810.1007/s10973-008-9053-8 ↗
18. Ma YJ. Acta Minera. Sin. 1985, 5, 251–256.
19. Wen P. Chem. Abstr. 2007, 6, 34–36.10.5089/9781451938203.023.A001 ↗
20. Xiao W, Zhan MS, Li Z. Mater. Design 2003, 24, 455–462.10.1016/S0261-3069(03)00064-510.1016/S0261-3069(03)00064-5 ↗
21. Zhang Z, Zhang J, Liao L, Xia Z. Mater. Res. Bull. 2013, 48, 1811–1816.10.1016/j.materresbull.2013.01.02910.1016/j.materresbull.2013.01.029 ↗
22. Yariv S. Appl. Clay Sci. 2004, 24, 225–236.10.1016/j.clay.2003.04.00210.1016/j.clay.2003.04.002 ↗
23. Xie W, Xie RC, Pan WP, Hunter D, Koene B, Tan LS, Vaia R. Chem. Mater. 2012, 14, 4837–4845.10.1021/cm020705v ↗
24. He HP, Ding Z, Zhu JX, Yuan P, Xi YF, Yang D, Frost RL. Clays Clay Miner. 2005, 53, 286–292.10.1346/CCMN.2005.0530308 ↗
25. Hedley CB, Yuan G, Theng BKG. Appl. Clay Sci. 2005, 35, 180–188.10.1016/j.clay.2006.09.005 ↗
26. Van Olphen H. Discuss Faraday Soc. 1951, 11, 82–84.10.1039/df951110008210.1039/df9511100082 ↗
27. Juang RS, Lin SH, Tsao KH. Colloid Interface Sci. 2002, 254, 234–241.10.1006/jcis.2002.862910.1006/jcis.2002.8629 ↗
28. Tasi G, Mizukami F. J. Math. Chem. 1999, 25, 55–64.10.1023/A:101916381248210.1023/A:1019163812482 ↗
29. Okamura E, Umemura J, Takenaka T. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1985, 812, 139–146.10.1016/0005-2736(85)90531-010.1016/0005-2736(85)90531-0 ↗