Non-isothermal crystallization behavior of polypropylene/zinc oxide composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The non-isothermal crystallization behavior of polypropylene (PP)/zinc oxide composites with various mass ratios was investigated by differential scanning calorimetry. The Jeziorny and Mo models were applied to calculate the non-isothermal crystallization kinetic parameters of the composites. During non-isothermal crystallization, the width of the exothermic peak increased from 7°C to 12°C with increasing cooling rate. The exothermic peak position at 10°C shifted to a lower temperature, and the half crystallization time t 1/2 decreased from 2.86 min to 0.51 min. The Friedman model was used to determine the variation of activation energy at each stage of crystallization. The crystallization activation energies obtained varied significantly at each stage of crystallization. The crystallization activation energy of PP was -126.8 kJ/mol at 70% relative crystallinity but reached -232.8 kJ/mol at 10% relative crystallinity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer crystallization and properties · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Technology, Nanjing 210009, China
State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Naffakh M, Martín Z, Marco C, Gomez MA, Jimenez I. Thermochim. Acta 2008, 472, 11–16.10.1016/j.tca.2008.03.003 ↗
2. Rjeb A, Letarte S, Tajounte L, Chafik EI Idrissi M, Adnot A, Roy D, Claire Y, Kaloustian J. J. Electron Spectrosc. 2000, 107, 221–230.10.1016/S0368-2048(00)00121-3 ↗
3. Park JS, Kim JH, Nho YC, Kwon OH. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1998, 69, 2213–2220.10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19980912)69:11<2213::AID-APP13>3.0.CO;2-# ↗
4. Dastjerdi R, Mojtahedi MRM, Shoshtari AM, Khosroshahi A. J. Text. I 2010, 101, 204–213.10.1080/00405000802346388 ↗
5. Li JF, Yang R, Yu J, Liu Y. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 2008, 93, 84–89.10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.10.022 ↗
6. Altan M, Yildirim H. J. Compos. Mater. 2012, 46, 3189–3199.10.1177/0021998312436999 ↗
7. Xiong HM, Wang ZD, Liu DP, Chen JS, Wang YG, Xia YY. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2005, 15, 1751–1756.10.1002/adfm.200500167 ↗
8. Padden FJ, Keith HD. J. Appl. Phys. 1959, 30, 1479–1484.10.1063/1.1734985 ↗
9. Avrami M. J. Chem. Phys. 1939, 7, 1103–1112.10.1063/1.1750380 ↗
10. Avrami M. J. Chem. Phys. 1940, 8, 212–224.10.1063/1.1750631 ↗
11. Avrami M. J. Chem. Phys. 1941, 9, 177–184.10.1063/1.1750872 ↗
12. Lorenzo MLDi, Silvestre C. Prog. Polym. Sci. 1999, 24, 917–950.10.1016/S0079-6700(99)00019-2 ↗
13. Jeziorny A. Polymer 1978, 19, 1142–1144.10.1016/0032-3861(78)90060-5 ↗
14. Grady BP, Pompeo F, Shambaugh RL, Resasco DE. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 5852–5858.10.1021/jp014622y ↗
15. Tang J, Wang Y, Liu H, Belfiore LA. Polymer 2004, 45, 2081–2091.10.1016/j.polymer.2003.11.046 ↗
16. Liu T, Mo Z, Wang S, Zhang H. Polym. Eng. Sci. 1997, 37, 568–575.10.1002/pen.11700 ↗
17. Ozawa T. Polymer 1971, 12, 150–158.10.1016/0032-3861(71)90041-3 ↗
18. Vyazovkin S. Macromol. Rapid Comm. 2002, 23, 771–775.10.1002/1521-3927(20020901)23:13<771::AID-MARC771>3.0.CO;2-G ↗
19. Kissinger HE. Anal. Chem. 1957, 29, 1702–1706.10.1021/ac60131a045 ↗