journal article·2017-01-01Open access

Micro-XCT-based finite element method for predicting the elastic modulus of needle carbon-fiber-reinforced ceramic matrix composites

Xiguang Gao, Piaoyang Luo, Guangwu Fang, Sheng Zhang, Yingdong Song

Abstract

Abstract In this study, a finite element method was developed based on X-ray computer tomography to predict the elastic modulus of needle carbon-fiber-reinforced ceramic matrix composites with voids randomly existing in the material. In these pictures, every pixel point contains all of the information of the components that we need, including voids. Using this information, the mechanical properties of components can be obtained, then a finite element model with voids was built and the predicted results fit well with the experiments. In addition, a volume average method was developed to determine the proper representative volume element size to reduce the computing time without losing the accuracy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Composite Material Mechanics · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Rock Mechanics and Modeling

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Aerospace Power System, College of Energy and Power Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, P. R. China

State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control Mechanical Structures, College of Energy and Power, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, P. R. China

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. Guedes JM, Kikuchi N. Comput. Method Appl. M. 1999, 83, 143–198.10.1016/0045-7825(90)90148-F ↗
2. Fish J, Shek K, Pandheerida M, Shephard MS. Comput. Method Appl. M. 1997, 148, 53–73.10.1016/S0045-7825(97)00030-3 ↗
3. Blacklock M, Hayhurst DR. J. Appl. Mech.-T ASME 2012, 79, 051020 (1–11).10.1115/1.4005585 ↗
4. Xu YJ, Zhang WH, Domaszewski M. Mater. Sci. Tech.-Lond. 2011, 27, 1213–1221.10.1179/026708310X12699498462760 ↗
5. Wang HB, Zhang WH, Xu YJ, Zeng QF. Mater. Sci. Tech.-Lond. 2008, 24, 1385–1398.10.1179/174328408X307292 ↗
6. Kuhn JL, Charalambides PG. J. Compos. Mater. 1998, 32, 1426–1471.10.1177/002199839803201601 ↗
7. Aboudi J. Appl. Mech. Rev. 1989, 42, 193–221.10.1115/1.3152428 ↗
8. Paley M, Aboudi J. Mech. Mater. 1992, 14, 127–139.10.1016/0167-6636(92)90010-B ↗
9. Orzco CE, Pindera M. AIAA J. 1999, 37, 482–488.10.2514/3.14195 ↗
10. Kwon YW. Compos. Struct. 1993, 25, 187–192.10.1111/j.1547-5069.1993.tb00779.x ↗
11. Jan S, Jan Z. Model Simul. Mater. Sci. 2008, 16, 085002.10.1088/0965-0393/16/8/085002 ↗
12. Ali J, Beere C, Mummery PM. Energy Mater. 2006, 1, 179–185.10.1179/174892406X160633 ↗
13. Martín-Herrero J, Germain C. Carbon 2007, 45, 1242–1253.10.1016/j.carbon.2007.01.021 ↗
14. Chang Y, Jiao G, Wang B, Liu W. Acta Mech. Solida Sin. 2006, 19, 152–159.10.1007/s10338-006-0618-4 ↗
15. Xu YJ, Zhang WH, Wang HB. Mater. Sci. Tech.-Lond. 2008, 24, 435–442.10.1179/174328408X282056 ↗
16. Diss P, Lamon J, Carpentier L, Loubet JL, Kapsa Ph. Carbon 2002, 40, 2567–2579.10.1016/S0008-6223(02)00169-0 ↗