Investigation and analysis of glass fabric/PVC composite laminates processing parameters
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In this work, the effects of processing parameters including temperature, time, and pressure on the properties of amorphous polyvinyl chloride (PVC)/fiberglass thermoplastic composite laminates were evaluated. The film stacking and hot pressing procedure was used to produce the composite laminates, and samples with [0/90] 10 layup and thickness of 3 mm were produced. Flexural strength and modulus of the samples were measured using three-point bending test (according to ASTM D790 standard test method), and microscopic images were used to evaluate the failure mechanisms and impregnation quality. The effects of the parameters on the strength were studied using analysis of variance (ANOVA), and it was found that processing temperature has the maximum effect on the products strength and increase of the temperature up to 230°C increases the flexural strength while more increase of temperature results in the matrix degradation and strength reduction. Also, processing time improves the wetting and impregnation quality; however, more increase of the processing time results in the matrix degradation and excessive reduction of the strength.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials · Textile materials and evaluations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering , Tarbiat Modares University , Tehran , Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering , Tarbiat Modares University , P. O. Box 14115-143 , Tehran , Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Faculty of Chemical Engineering , Tarbiat Modares University , Tehran , Iran (Islamic Republic of)
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Liu Q, Lin Y, Zong Z, Sun G, Li Q. Compos. Struct. 2013, 97, 231–238.10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.05210.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.052 ↗
2. Hwang HF, Hwang KJ. Compos. Part A 2002, 33, 669–676.10.1016/S1359-835X(02)00004-010.1016/S1359-835X(02)00004-0 ↗
3. Hufenbach W, Böhm R, Thieme M, Winkler A, Mäder E, Rausch J, Schade M. Mater. Des. 2011, 32, 1468–1476.10.1016/j.matdes.2010.08.04910.1016/j.matdes.2010.08.049 ↗
4. Wu W, Xie L, Jiang B, Ziegmann G. Compos. Struct. 2013, 105, 279–287.10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.05.03510.1016/j.compstruct.2013.05.035 ↗
5. Parton H, Verpoest I. Polym. Compos. 2005, 26, 60–65.10.1002/pc.2007410.1002/pc.20074 ↗
6. Yang L, Thomason JL. PolymTest 2012, 31, 895–903.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.07.001 ↗
7. Ye L, Friedrich K, Kastel J, Mai Y. Compos. Sci. Technol. 1995, 54, 349–358.10.1016/0266-3538(95)00061-510.1016/0266-3538(95)00061-5 ↗
8. Mayer C, Wang X, Neitzel M. Compos. Part A 1998, 29(A), 783–793.10.1016/S1359-835X(98)00056-610.1016/S1359-835X(98)00056-6 ↗
9. Han SH, Oh HJ, Kim SS. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2014, 91, 55–62.10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.11.02110.1016/j.compscitech.2013.11.021 ↗
10. Ferreira N, Capela C, Ferreira JM, Costa, JM. Fiber Polym. 2014, 15, 1017–1022.10.1007/s12221-014-1017-y10.1007/s12221-014-1017-y ↗
11. Jonoobi M, Aitomaki Y, Mathew AP, Oksman K. Compos. Part A 2014, 58, 30–35.10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.11.01010.1016/j.compositesa.2013.11.010 ↗
12. Wu W, Klunker F, Xie L, Jiang B, Ziegmann G. Compos Part A 2013, 53, 190–203.10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.06.01310.1016/j.compositesa.2013.06.013 ↗
13. Baets J, Godara A, Devaux J, Verpoest I. Compos. Part A 2008, 39, 1756–1761.10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.08.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2008.08.004 ↗
14. Abt T, Soto MS, de Ilarduya AM. Eur. Polym. J. 2012, 48, 163–171.10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2011.10.01710.1016/j.eurpolymj.2011.10.017 ↗
15. Sombatsompop N, Prapruit W, Chaochanchaikul K. J. Vinyl Additive Technol. 2009, 16, 33–41.10.1002/vnl.20202 ↗
16. El-Shekeil YA, Sapuan SM, Jawaidb M, Al-Shuja OM. Mater. Des. 2014, 58, 130–135.10.1016/j.matdes.2014.01.04710.1016/j.matdes.2014.01.047 ↗
17. Abdrahman MF, Zainudin ES. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2011, 471–472, 507–12.10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.471-472.507 ↗
18. Endo K. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2002, 27, 2021–2054.10.1016/S0079-6700(02)00066-710.1016/S0079-6700(02)00066-7 ↗
19. Zal V, Moslemi Naeini H, Bahramian AR, Sinke J. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2016, DOI: 10.1007/s00170-016-9075-5.10.1007/s00170-016-9075-5 ↗
20. Rangela EC, dos Santos NM, Bortoleto JRR, Durrant SF, Schreiner WH, Honda RY, Rangel RCC, Cruz NC. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2001, 258, 1854–1861.10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.10.061 ↗
21. Xie XL, Liu QX, Li RKY, Zhou XP, Zhang QX, Yu ZZ, Mai YW. Polymer 2004, 45, 6665–6673.10.1016/j.polymer.2004.07.04510.1016/j.polymer.2004.07.045 ↗
22. Valente M, Sarasini F, Marra F, Tirillò J, Pulci G. Compos. Part A 2011, 42, 649–657.10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.02.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2011.02.004 ↗
23. Yahaya R, Sapuan SM, Jawaid M, Leman Z, Zainudin ES. Mater. Des. 2015, 67, 173–179.10.1016/j.matdes.2014.11.02410.1016/j.matdes.2014.11.024 ↗
24. Ferreira JAM, Capela C, Costa JD. Compos. Part A 2010, 41, 345–352.10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.10.01810.1016/j.compositesa.2009.10.018 ↗
25. Standard Test Methods for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials. ASTM, D790–07, 2007.
26. Serrano A, Espinach FX, Tresserras J, del Rey R, Pellicer N, Mutje P. Mater. Des. 2014, 55, 319–324.10.1016/j.matdes.2013.10.01110.1016/j.matdes.2013.10.011 ↗
27. Yoshihara H. Construction Building Mater. 2012, 34, 11–15.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.00710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.007 ↗