journal article·2016-11-01Open access

Crushing analysis and crashworthiness optimization design of reinforced regular hexagon honeycomb sandwich panel

Qiang He, Dawei Ma, Zhendong Zhang, Lin Yao

Abstract

Abstract Honeycomb sandwich panels (HSP) have exhibited significant advantages in light weight and energy absorption, and they have been widely applied in the automotive, aerospace, transportation and defense industries. Rather than restating details of the existing standard regular hexagon HSP (R0-HSP), this paper introduces single-rib reinforced regular hexagon HSP (R1-HSP) and double-rib reinforced regular hexagon HSP (R2-HSP). The mechanical characteristics of these three structures are first investigated by series full-scale elaborator models through LS-DYNA. It is found that the R1-HSP has the best crashworthiness performance under axial impact regarding specific energy absorption per unit ( SEAm and SEAv ) when the peak crashing stress ( σ peak ) is less important. Secondly, the thickness matching effect between stiffener and cell wall is analyzed with equivalent apparent density index to evaluate the contribution of the change of deformation model to the general mechanical properties. Consequently, stiffener thickness of 2.0 times and 1.5 times that of cell wall are found to be the most optimal options for R1-HSP and R2-HSP, respectively. To optimize the crashworthiness of the R1-HSP, optimal Latin hypercube design method is used for selection of sampling design points in the design space. And in the meantime, an accurate surrogate modeling method, or more specifically named as response surface method, is adopted to formulate the SEAm , SEAv and σ peak functions. The results yielded from the optimization indicate that the R1-HSP is superior to R0-HSP both in SEAm and SEAv under the same limitation of σ peak . This research is significant in providing technical support in the extended applications of different HSPs used as crashworthiness structures, and it has essential reference value in low volume and low mass energy absorber design.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics · Material Properties and Processing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210014, China

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. Wadley HNG. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 2006, 364, 31–68.10.1098/rsta.2005.1697 ↗
2. Zhu F, Lu G, Ruan D, Shu D. Struct. Eng. Mech. 2009, 32, 351–370.10.12989/sem.2009.32.2.351 ↗
3. Zhu F, Zhao L, Lu G, Gad E. Int. J. Impact Eng. 2009, 36, 687–699.10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.12.004 ↗
4. Meo M, Morris AJ, Vignjevic R, Marengo G. Compos. Struct. 2003, 62, 353–360.10.1016/j.compstruct.2003.09.035 ↗
5. Meo M, Vignjevic R, Marengo G. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2005, 47, 1301–1325.10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.05.006 ↗
6. Othman AR, Barton DC. Compos. Struct. 2008, 85, 126–138.10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.10.034 ↗
7. Nguyen MQ, Jacombs SS, Thomson RS, Hachenberg D, Scott ML. Compos. Struct. 2005, 67, 217–227.10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.09.018 ↗
8. Foo CC, Seah LK, Chai GB. Compos. Struct. 2008, 85, 20–28.10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.10.016 ↗
9. Goldsmith W, Sackman JL. Int. J. Impact Eng. 1992, 12, 241–262.10.1016/0734-743X(92)90447-2 ↗
10. Moriarty K, Goldsmith W. Manuf. Eng. 1993, 13, 293–317.10.1016/0734-743X(93)90098-R ↗
11. Zhou G, Hill M. J. Sandwich Struct. Mater. 2007, 9, 309–342.10.1177/1099636207067134 ↗
12. Atli-Veltin B, Gandhi F. In Proceedings 66th American Helicopter Society Annual Forum, Phoenix, AZ, May 2010, 206–221.
13. Wang ZW, Yu P. Mater. Des. 2010, 31, 4321–4328.10.1016/j.matdes.2010.03.053 ↗
14. Crupi V, Epasto G, Guglielmino E. Int. J. Impact Eng. 2012, 43, 6–15.10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.12.002 ↗
15. Mcfarland RK. AIAA J. 1963, 1, 1380–1385.10.2514/3.1798 ↗
16. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF. Cellular Solid: Structure and Properties. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1997.10.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
17. De Oliveira JG, Wierzbicki T. J. Strain Anal. Eng. Des. 1982, 17, 229–236.10.1243/03093247V174229 ↗
18. Wierzbicki T. Int. J. Impact Eng. 1983, 1, 157–174.10.1016/0734-743X(83)90004-0 ↗
19. Wierzbicki T, Abramowicz W. J. Appl. Mech. 1983, 50, 727–734.10.1115/1.3167137 ↗
20. Wu E, Jiang WS. Int. J. Impact Eng. 1997, 19, 439–456.10.1016/S0734-743X(97)00004-3 ↗
21. Bai ZH, Guo HR, Jiang BH, Zhu F, Cao LB. Thin Wall. Struct. 2014, 80, 38–45.10.1016/j.tws.2014.02.024 ↗
22. Yamashita M, Gotoh M. Int. J. Impact Eng. 2005, 32, 618–630.10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.09.001 ↗
23. Hou B, Zhao H, Pattofatto S, Liu JG, Li YL. Int. J. Sol. Struct. 2012, 49, 2754–2762.10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.05.005 ↗
24. Aktay L, Johnson AF, Kroplin BH. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2008, 75, 2616–2630.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.03.008 ↗
25. Radford DD, McShane GJ, Deshpande VS, Fleck NA. J. Appl. Mech. 2007, 74, 658–667.10.1115/1.2424717 ↗
26. Erami K, Ohno N, Okumura D. Int. J. Plast. 2006, 22,1569–1585.10.1016/j.ijplas.2005.09.003 ↗
27. Ohno N, Okumura D, Niikawa T. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2004, 46, 1697–1713.10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.09.011 ↗
28. Hou S, Li Q, Long S. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 2007, 43, 555–565.10.1016/j.finel.2006.12.008 ↗
29. Liu Y, Zhang XC. Int. J. Impact Eng. 2009, 36, 98–109.10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.03.001 ↗
30. Hou S, Zhao S, Ren L, Han X, Li Q. Mater. Des. 2013, 51, 1071–1084.10.1016/j.matdes.2013.04.086 ↗
31. Li M, Liu RQ, Guo HW, Deng ZQ. Adv. Mater. Res. 2011, 217–218: 723–727.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.217-218.723 ↗
32. Li M, Deng ZQ, Guo HW, Liu RQ. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 2013, 26, 784–792.10.3901/CJME.2013.04.784 ↗
33. Li M, Deng ZQ, Liu RQ, Guo HW. Int. J. Crashworthines. 2011, 16, 411–419.10.1080/13588265.2011.596677 ↗
34. Sun G, Li G, Zhou S, Li H, Hou S, Li Q. Struct. Multidiscip. O. 2011, 4, 99–110.10.1007/s00158-010-0601-z ↗
35. Kurtaran H, Eskandarian A, Marzougui D, Bedewi NE. Comput. Mech. 2002, 29, 409–421.10.1007/s00466-002-0351-x ↗
36. Fang H, Rais R, Liu Z. Comput. Struct. 2005, 83, 2121–2136.10.1016/j.compstruc.2005.02.025 ↗
37. Hou S, Ren L, Dong D, Han X. J. Sandwich Struct. Mater. 2012, 14, 655–678.10.1177/1099636212445057 ↗
38. Esfahlani SS, Shirvani H, Shirvani A, Nwaubani S, Mebrahtu H, Chirwa C. Int. J. Crashworthines. 2013, 18, 264–275.10.1080/13588265.2013.776337 ↗
39. Li M, Deng ZQ, Guo HW, Liu RQ, Ding B. J. Cent. South Univ., 2014, 21, 912–919.10.1007/s11771-014-2018-0 ↗
40. Yin HF, Wen GL, Gan NF. Int. J. Comput. Methods 2011, 8, 863–877.10.1142/S0219876211002885 ↗
41. Hexcel Company. HexWeb Honeycomb Energy Absorption Systems Design Data Report. Hexcel Company: Stratford, 2005.
42. Yin HF, Wen GL, Hou SJ, Chen K. Mater. Des. 2011, 32, 4449–4460.10.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.060 ↗
43. Kim HS. Thin Wall. Struct. 2002, 40, 311–327.10.1016/S0263-8231(01)00069-6 ↗
44. Qi C, Yang S, Dong FL. Thin Wall. Struct. 2012, 59, 103–119.10.1016/j.tws.2012.05.008 ↗
45. Zhu F, Zhao LM, Lu GX, Wang ZH. Int. J. Impact Eng. 2008, 35, 937–951.10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.11.003 ↗
46. Nguyen MQ, Jacombs SS, Thomson RS, et al. Compos. Struct. 2005, 67, 221–227.10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.09.018 ↗
47. Yin H, Wen G. Int. J. Mech. Mater. Des. 2011, 7, 253–263.10.1007/s10999-011-9163-5 ↗
48. Yin H, Wen G. J. Mech. Eng. 2011, 47, 93–100.10.3901/JME.2011.16.093 ↗
49. Luo C, Zhou A, Liu R, Deng Z, Li M. J. Mech. Eng. 2011, 46, 52–59.
50. Hamad H, Al-Smadi A. Eng. Comput. 2007, 23, 175–185.10.1007/s00366-007-0056-z ↗
51. Sun GY, Li GY, Gong ZH, He GQ, Li Q. Eng. Optim. 2011, 43, 1351–1366.10.1080/0305215X.2011.557072 ↗
52. Jin R, Chen W, Simpson TW. Struct. Multidiscip. O. 2001, 23, 1–13.10.1007/s00158-001-0160-4 ↗
53. Schittkowski K. Ann. Oper. Res. 1986, 5, 485–500.10.1007/BF02022087 ↗
54. Schittkowski K, Zillober C. Syst. Model. Optim. 2005, 166, 73–107.10.1007/0-387-23467-5_5 ↗
55. Park JS. J. Stat. Plan. Infer. 1994, 39, 95–111.10.1016/0378-3758(94)90115-5 ↗