journal article·2021-05-20Open access

Comparison of the shear behavior in graphite-epoxy composites evaluated by means of biaxial test and off-axis tension test

Juan Carlos Marín, Alberto Barroso

Abstract

Abstract Characterization of shear behavior in composite materials remains a not fully solved problem. In the last fifty years, many different approaches have been proposed to solve this problem (rail shear, thin-walled tube torsion, off-axis tensile, ±45° tensile, Arcan, Iosipescu, asymmetric four-point bend, plate twist, v-notched rail shear, off-axis flexural, and shear frame), although none of these approaches have achieved an unquestionable solution. For this reason, proposals of alternative methods and comparison between different experimental techniques are of interest. In the present work, the use of cruciform samples with the fiber oriented at 45° with respect to the load directions, and subjected to tension-compression (creating a pure shear stress state at the central part of the samples), is studied. The experimental results of the cruciform samples have been compared with the off-axis tests (with the fiber at 10°) for the same material (AS4/8552), finding a good agreement between the shear experimental curves, especially at the initial part of the curve, where the shear modulus is calculated. Nevertheless, the shear strength value obtained by means of the cruciform specimen has shown to be significantly lower than that obtained using the off-axis test. A Finite Element numerical model of the cruciform specimen has been developed to analyze the stress field of the samples. Numerical results have shown that there is a central area of the cruciform specimens where a pure and uniform shear stress state is developed, which is suitable for the evaluation of the shear constitutive law of the material. It has been observed that there is a ( σ 22 ) stress concentration in the transition between the straight and curved parts of the boundary geometry of the samples, which explain some premature failures of the samples. This premature failure could be avoided with tabs extended up to the beginning of the central part of the sample.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Group of Elasticity and Strength of Materials, School of Engineering, University of Seville, Camino de los Descubrimientos s/n , 41092 Seville , Spain

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Welsh JS, Mayes JS, Key CT, McLaughlin RN. Comparison of MCT failure prediction techniques and experimental verification for biaxially loaded gass fabric-reinforced composite laminates. J Comp Mat. 2004;38(24):2165–81.10.1177/0021998304045589 ↗
2. Smits A, Van Hemelrijck D, Philippidis TP, Cardon A. Design of a cruciform specimen for biaxial testing of fibre reinforced composite laminates. Comp Sci Tech. 2006;66(7–8):964–75.10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.08.011 ↗
3. Ramault C, Makris A, Van Hemelrijck D, Lamkanfi E, Van Paepegem W. Comparison of different techniques for strain monitoring of a biaxially loaded cruciform specimen. Strain. 2011;47(SUPPL.2):210–7.10.1111/j.1475-1305.2010.00760.x ↗
4. Vankan WJ, Tijs BHAH, Jong GJ, De Fred HC, Singh NK. Stregth of notched and un-notched thermoplastic composite laminate in biaxial tension and compression. J Comp Mat. 2016;50(25):3477–500.10.1177/0021998315621963 ↗
5. Kobeissi A, Rahme P, Leotoing L, Guines D. Strength characterization of glass/epoxy plain weave composite under different biaxial loading ratios. J Comp Mat. 2020;54(19):2549–63.10.1177/0021998319899135 ↗
6. Kennedy JM, Barnett TR, Farley GL. Experimental and analytical evaluation of a biaxial test for determining in-plane shear properties of composites. SAMPE Quat. 1992;27(1):28–37.
7. Marín JC, Justo J, Barroso A, Cañas J, París F. On the optimal choice of fibre orientation angle in off-axis tensile test using oblique end-tabs: theoretical and experimental studies. Comp Sci Tech. 2019;178:11–25.10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.04.022 ↗
8. Pagano NJ, Halpin JC. Influence of end constraint in the testing of anisotropic bodies. J Compos Mater. 1968;2(1):18–31.10.1177/002199836800200102 ↗
9. Wu EM, Thomas RL. Off-axis test of a composite. J Compos Mater. 1968;2(4):523–6.10.1177/002199836800200418 ↗
10. Rizzo RR. More on the influence of end constraint on off-axis tensile test. J Compos Mater. 1969;3:202–19.10.1177/002199836900300201 ↗
11. Richards GL, Airhart TP, Ashton JE. Off-axis tensile coupon testing. J Compos Mater. 1969;3:586–9.10.1177/002199836900300322 ↗
12. Pipes RB, Cole BW. On the off-axis strength test for anisotropic materials. J Compos Mater. 1973;7:246–56.10.1177/002199837300700208 ↗
13. Chamis CC, Sinclair JH. Ten-deg off-axis test for shear properties in fiber composites. Exp Mech. 1977;17(9):339–46.10.1007/BF02326320 ↗
14. Chang BW, Huang PH, Smith DG. A pinned-end fixture for off-axis testing. Exp Tech. 1984;8(6):28–30.10.1111/j.1747-1567.1984.tb02400.x ↗
15. Pindera MJ, Herakovich CT. Shear characterization of unidirectional composites with the off-axis tension test. Exp Mech. 1986;26(1):103–12.10.1007/BF02319962 ↗
16. Cron SM, Palazotto AN, Sandhu RS. The improvement of end-boundary conditions for off-axis tension specimen use. Exp Mech. 1988;28(1):14–9.10.1007/BF02328989 ↗
17. Sun CT, Berreth SP. A new end tab design for off-axis tension test of composite materials. J Compos Mater. 1988;22(8):766–79.10.1177/002199838802200805 ↗
18. Sun CT, Chung I. An oblique end-tab design for testing off-axis composite specimens. Composites. 1993;24(8):619–23.10.1016/0010-4361(93)90124-Q ↗
19. Marín JC, Cañas J, París F, Morton J. Determination of G12 by means of the off-axis tension test. Part I: review of gripping systems and correction factors. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2002;33(1):87–100.10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00065-3 ↗
20. Marín JC, Cañas J, París F, Morton J. Determination of G12 by means of the off-axis tension test. Part II: a self-consistent approach to the application of correction factors. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2002;33(1):101–11.10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00066-5 ↗
21. Xiao Y, Kawai M, Hatta H. An integrated method for off-axis tension and compression testing of unidirectional composites. J Compos Mater. 2011;45(6):657–69.10.1177/0021998310377936 ↗
22. Barroso A, Marín JC, Mantič V, París F. Premature failures in standard test specimens with composite materials induced by stress singularities in adhesive joints. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2020;97:102478.10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102478 ↗
23. Correa E, Barroso A, Pérez MD, París F. Design for a cruciform coupon used for tensile biaxial transverse test son composite materials. Compos Sci Technol. 2017;145:138–48.10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.03.045 ↗