journal article·2016-01-01Open access

Durability study of ramie fiber fabric reinforced phenolic plates under humidity conditions

Guijun Xian, Peng Yin, Innocent Kafodya, Hui Li, Wei-lun Wang

Abstract

Abstract A durability study of a ramie fiber fabric reinforced phenolic resin (RFRP) plate under 50%, 85%, and 98% relative humidity for 6 months at room temperature was performed. Water absorption and desorption, tensile and short beam shear strengths of the RFRP plates were investigated as a function of exposure time. RFRP samples show strong hydrophilic characteristics and the saturated water content varies from 0.73% to 4.5% with relative humidity ranging from 50% to 98%. After 6 months of exposure to 98% relative humidity, an abnormal extra amount of moisture was absorbed, which may have resulted from cracks in the resin matrix or from debonding between fiber and resin due to swelling of the fibers with high moisture content. It was found that the tensile modulus is more susceptible to moisture uptake, which is ascribed to the degradation of ramie fibers with the water ingress. An approximate linearity between the mechanical properties and the moisture content is observed if the abnormal extra water uptake is neglected. Both tensile and short beam shear strengths of the RFRP samples recovered remarkably when samples were fully dried at 60°C, indicating a low degree of permanent degradation occurred due to the exposure.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Textile materials and evaluations · Wood Treatment and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Durability for Marine Civil Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Mohanty A, Misra M, Hinrichsen G. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2000, 276, 1–24.10.1002/(SICI)1439-2054(20000301)276:1<1::AID-MAME1>3.0.CO;2-W10.1002/(SICI)1439-2054(20000301)276:1<1::AID-MAME1>3.0.CO;2-W ↗
2. Pandey JK, Ahn SH, Lee CS, Mohanty AK, Misra M. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2010, 295, 975–989.10.1002/mame.20100009510.1002/mame.201000095 ↗
3. Alamri H, Low I. Polym. Testing 2012, 31, 810–818.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.06.00110.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.06.001 ↗
4. Lodha P, Netravali AN. J. Mater. Sci. 2002, 37, 3657–3665.10.1023/A:101655712437210.1023/A:1016557124372 ↗
5. Mohanty A, Wibowo A, Misra M, Drzal LT. Compos. Part A-Appl. S. 2004, 35, 363–370.10.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.01510.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.015 ↗
6. Summerscales J, Virk A, Hall W. Compos. Part A-Appl. S. 2013, 44, 132–139.10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.08.01810.1016/j.compositesa.2012.08.018 ↗
7. Mueller DH, Krobjilowski A. J. Indust. Tex. 2003, 33, 111–130.10.1177/15280830303924810.1177/152808303039248 ↗
8. Alamri H, Low IM, Alothman Z. Compos. Part B-Eng. 2012, 43, 2762–2771.10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.03710.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.037 ↗
9. Liu ZT, Yang Y, Zhang L, Liu ZW, Xiong H. Cellulose 2007 14, 337–345.10.1007/s10570-007-9117-010.1007/s10570-007-9117-0 ↗
10. Liu ZT, Yang Y, Zhang L, Sun P, Liu ZW, Lu J, Xiong H, Peng Y, Tang S. Carbohy. Polym. 2008, 71, 18–25.10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.05.00810.1016/j.carbpol.2007.05.008 ↗
11. Sao KB, Samantaray BK, Bhattacherjee S. J. App. Polym. Sci. 1994, 52, 1687–1694.10.1002/app.1994.07052120310.1002/app.1994.070521203 ↗
12. Dhakal H, Zhang Z, Richardson M. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2007, 67, 1674–1683.10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.06.01910.1016/j.compscitech.2006.06.019 ↗
13. Fraga AN, Frullloni E, de la Osa O, Kenny JM, Vázqueza A. Polym. Testing 2006, 25, 181–187.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.11.00210.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.11.002 ↗
14. Han SO, Drzal LT. Eur. Polymer J. 2003, 39, 1791–1799.10.1016/S0014-3057(03)00099-510.1016/S0014-3057(03)00099-5 ↗
15. Kim HJ, Seo DW. Int. J. Fatigue 2006, 28, 1307–1314.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.02.01810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.02.018 ↗
16. Thwe MM, Liao K. Compos. Part A-Appl. S. 2002, 33, 43–52.10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00071-910.1016/S1359-835X(01)00071-9 ↗
17. Wang B, Panigrahi S, Tabil L, Crerar W. J. Reinf. Plast. Comp. 2007, 26, 447–463.10.1177/073168440607252610.1177/0731684406072526 ↗
18. Summerscales J, Dissanayake NPJ, Virk AS, Hall W. A review of bast fibres and their composites. Part 1–Fibres as reinforcements. Compos. Part A-Appl. S. 2010, 41, 1329–1335.10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.06.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2010.06.001 ↗
19. Nam S, Netravali AN. Fibers. Polym. 2006, 7, 372–379.10.1007/BF0287576910.1007/BF02875769 ↗
20. Lu Y, Weng L, Cao X. Carbohy. Polym. 2006, 63, 198–204.10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.08.02710.1016/j.carbpol.2005.08.027 ↗
21. Xian G, Karbhari VM. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 2007, 92, 1650–1659.10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.06.01510.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.06.015 ↗
22. Bunsell AR, Renard J. Fundamentals of fibre reinforced composite materials. Institute of Physics Publishing: Bristol and Philadelphia, 2005.10.1201/978142005696910.1201/9781420056969 ↗
23. Shen CH, Springer GS. J. Compos. Mater. 1976, 10, 2–20.10.1177/002199837601000101
24. Loos AC, Springer GS. J. Compos. Mater. 1979, 13, 131–147.10.1177/00219983790130020510.1177/002199837901300205 ↗
25. Saratale GD, Chen SD, Lo YC, Saratale RG, Chang JS. J. Sci. Indust. Res. 2008, 67, 962.
26. Abanilla MA, Li Y, Karbhari VM. Compos. Part B-Eng. 2005, 37, 200–212.10.1016/j.compositesb.2005.05.01610.1016/j.compositesb.2005.05.016 ↗