journal article·2017-09-26Open access

Effects of the alkaline solution/binder ratio and curing condition on the mechanical properties of alkali-activated fly ash mortars

Maochieh Chi

Abstract

Abstract The study investigates the effects of the alkaline solution/binder ratio and the curing condition on the mechanical properties of alkali-activated fly ash (AAFA) mortars. Class F fly ash was used as the raw material, and sodium hydroxide and liquid sodium silicate were used for the preparation of alkaline activators. Three alkaline solution-to-binder ratios (0.35, 0.5, and 0.65) and four different initial curing conditions (curing in air at ambient temperature for 24 h, 30°C for 24 h, 65°C for 12 h, and 85°C for 6 h) were considered. Test results show that AAFA mortars with alkaline solution-to-binder ratio of 0.35 had higher compressive strength, lower drying shrinkage, lower water absorption, and lower initial surface absorption rate than the other mortars. Furthermore, the curing condition influenced the compressive strength development and drying shrinkage of AAFA mortars at early ages. AAFA mortars cured at 65°C for 12 h appeared to have superior mechanical properties. XRD demonstrates that the hydration products of AAFA mortars are mainly amorphous alkaline aluminosilicate gel, which attributed to the compressive strength. Consequently, the alkaline solution-to-binder ratio significantly affects more the mechanical properties than the curing condition based on the presented results.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications · Concrete Properties and Behavior

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Fire Science , WuFeng University , 117, Sec 2, Chiankuo Road , Minshiung Township , Chiayi County 621, Taiwan , ROC

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Palomo A, Grutzeck MW, Blanco MT. Cem. Concr. Res. 1999, 29, 1323–1329.10.1016/S0008-8846(98)00243-9 ↗
2. Criado M, Fernández-Jiménez A, Palomo A. Fuel 2010, 89, 3185–3192.10.1016/j.fuel.2010.03.051 ↗
3. Vargas ASd, Molin DCCD, Vilela ACF, Silva FJd, Pavão B, Veit H. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2011, 33, 653–660.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.03.006 ↗
4. Jun Y, Oh JE. Cem. Concr. Res. 2014, 52, 396–403.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.058 ↗
5. Bakharev, T. Cem. Concr. Res. 2005, 35, 1224–1232.10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.031 ↗
6. Němecěk, Jí, Šmilauer V, Kopecký L. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2011, 33, 163–170.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.10.005 ↗
7. Pacheco-Torgal F, Castro-Gomes Jo, Jalali S. Constr. Build. Mater. 2008, 22, 1305–1314.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.10.015 ↗
8. Hu M, Zhu X, Long F. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2009, 31, 762–768.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.07.006 ↗
9. Somaratna J, Ravikumar D, Neithalath N. Cem. Concr. Res. 2010, 40, 1688–1696.10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.08.010 ↗
10. Torres-Carrasco M, Puertas F. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 90, 397–408.10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.074 ↗
11. Chi M, Liu Y, Huang R. IACSIT Inter.J. Eng. Tech. 2015, 7, 59–64.
12. Ryu GS, Lee YB, Koh KT, Chung YS. Constr. Build. Mater. 2013, 47, 409–418.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.069 ↗
13. Wang J, Wu X-l, Wang J-x, Liu C-z, Lai Ym, Hong Z-K. Micropo. Mesopo. Mat. 2012, 155, 186–191.10.1016/j.micromeso.2012.01.016 ↗
14. Criado M, Jiménez AF, Sobrados I, Palomo A, Sanz J. J. Eur. Ceram. Socy. 2012, 32, 2799–2807.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.11.036 ↗
15. Chi M, Huang R. Adv. Sci. Lett. 2012, 16, 7–12.10.1166/asl.2012.3313 ↗
16. Vladimir Z. Constr. Build. Mater. 2007, 21, 1463–1469.
17. Odler I, Röbler M. Cem. Concr. Res. 1985, 15, 401–410.10.1016/0008-8846(85)90113-9 ↗
18. Schulze J. Cem. Concr. Res. 1999, 29, 909–915.10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00060-5 ↗
19. Provis JL, Yong CZ, Duxon P, van Deventer JSJ. Colloids. Surf. A. 2009, 336, 57–63.10.1016/j.colsurfa.2008.11.019 ↗
20. Zuhua Z, Xiao Y, Huajun Z, Yue C. Appl. Clay Sci. 2009, 43, 218–223.10.1016/j.clay.2008.09.003 ↗
21. Xiao Y, Zuhua Z, Huajun Z, Yue C. Thermochim. Acta 2009, 493, 49–54.10.1016/j.tca.2009.04.002 ↗
22. Ruiz-Santaquiteria C, Skibsted J, Fernández-Jiménez A, Palomo A. Cem. Concr. Res. 2012, 42, 1242–1251.10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.05.019 ↗
23. Oh JE, Monteiro PJM, Jun SS, Choi S, Clark SM. Cem. Concr. Res. 2010, 40, 189–196.10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.10.010 ↗
24. Ravikumar D, Peethamparan S, Neithalath N. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2010, 32, 399–410.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.03.007 ↗
25. Khale D, Chaudhary R. J. Mater. Sci. 2007, 42, 729–746.10.1007/s10853-006-0401-4 ↗
26. Criado M, Fernández-Jiménez A, Palomo A. Micropo. Mesopo. Mat. 2007, 106, 180–191.10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.02.055 ↗
27. Rovnaník P. Constr. Build. Mater. 2010, 24, 1176–1183.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.12.023 ↗
28. Kovalchuk G, Fernández-Jiménez A, Palomo A. Fuel 2007, 86, 315–322.10.1016/j.fuel.2006.07.010 ↗
29. Swanepoel J, Strydom C. Appl. Geochem. 2002, 17, 1143–1148.10.1016/S0883-2927(02)00005-7 ↗
30. Chi M. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 35, 240–245.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.005 ↗
31. Palomo Á, Alonso S, Fernández-Jiménez A, Sobrados I, Sanz J. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2004, 87, 1141–1145.10.1111/j.1551-2916.2004.01141.x ↗
32. Fernández-Jiménez A, Palomo A. Fuel 2003, 82, 2259–2265.10.1016/S0016-2361(03)00194-7 ↗
33. Jaarsveld Jv, Deventer Jv. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1999, 38, 3932–3941.10.1021/ie980804b ↗
34. ASTM C778 Standard Specification for Standard Sand. 2013.
35. Sievert T, Wolter A, Singh NB. Cem. Concr. Res. 2005, 35, 623–630.10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.02.010 ↗
36. ASTM C109 Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars. 2011.
37. ASTM C596 Standard Test Method for Drying Shrinkage of Mortar containing Hydraulic Cement. 2009.
38. ASTM C642 Standard Test Method for Density, Absorption, and Voids in Hardened Concrete. 2006.
39. Collins F, Sanjayan JG. Cem. Concr. Res. 1999, 29, 607–610.10.1016/S0008-8846(98)00203-8 ↗
40. Li H-j, Sun H-H. Int. J. Miner. Metal. Mater. 2009, 16, 482–486.10.1016/S1674-4799(09)60084-4 ↗
41. BS 1881-201 Testing concrete. Method for determination of water absorption. 1986.
42. ASTM D4404 Standard Test Method for Determination of Pore Volume and Pore Volume Distribution of Soil and Rock by Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry. 2010.
43. Kumar R, Bhattacharjee B. Cem. Concr. Res. 2003, 33, 417–424.10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00974-2 ↗
44. Fedrizzi L, Azzolini F, Bonora PL. Cem. Concr. Res. 2005, 35, 551–561.10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.05.018 ↗
45. Nath SK, Kumar S. Constr. Build. Mater. 2013, 38, 924–930.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.09.070 ↗
46. Komljenović M, Baščarević Z, Bradić V. J. Hazar. Mater. 2010, 181, 35–42.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.04.064 ↗