journal article·2023-03-14Open access

Metakaolin-based geopolymers filled with volcanic fly ashes: FT-IR, thermal characterization, and antibacterial property

Ignazio Blanco, Antonio D’Angelo, Veronica Viola, Luigi Vertuccio, Michelina Catauro

Abstract

Abstract In countries where volcanic activity is widespread, fly ash (FA) formation can represent both a waste to be disposed of and a resource of inorganic substances that can be utilized. Among the technologies able to incorporate FA, geopolymers (GP) or inorganic aluminosilicate amorphous materials are very suitable for this purpose. In this study, GP are realized using metakaolin (MK), sodium hydroxide solution (NaOH 8 M), sodium silicate solution (Na 2 SiO 3 ), and FA as filler (20 wt% with respect to MK content). The samples were cured at 25 or 40°C for 24 h and the physicochemical, thermal, and antibacterial properties of this material through the integrity test, weight loss test, Fourier-transform infra-red spectroscopy (FT-IR), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and Kirby-Bauer assay were assessed. Integrity and weight loss tests indirectly revealed the stability of the macroscopic 3D networks and that the curing at 40°C led to more stable GP. The shift of the Si–O–T absorption band (from 1,090 cm −1 of the MK to 1,017–1,012 cm −1 of the specimens with and without FA) in FT-IR spectra suggested the occurrence of the geopolymerizazion reactions, while TGA study confirmed the higher stability of samples cured at 40°C (with a mass loss equal to 7–13% at 800°C under nitrogen atmosphere). Finally, the antimicrobial activity shed light on the ability of the synthesized GP with the filler and treated at 40°C to have a great effect against Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa .
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production · Clay minerals and soil interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture and INSTM UdR, University of Catania , Viale A. Doria 6 , 95125 Catania , Italy

Department of Engineering, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli” , Via Roma n. 29 , 81031 Aversa , Italy

Department of Environmental, Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli” , Via Vivaldi 43 , 81100 Caserta , Italy

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. Silva PD, Sagoe-Crenstil K, Sirivivatnanon V. Kinetics of geopolymerization: Role of Al2O3 and SiO2. Cem Concr Res. 2007;37:512–8.10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.01.003 ↗
2. Lloyd NA, Rangan BV. Geopolymer concrete: A review of development and opportunities. 35th Conference on Our World in Concrete & Structures. Singapore; 25–27 August 2010. Article Online Id: 100035037. http://cipremier.com/100035037.
3. Zakka WP, Lim NHAS, Khun MC. A scientometric review of geopolymer concrete. J Clean Prod. 2021;280(1):124353.10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124353 ↗
4. Fan X. A brief introduction on the research status and future prospects on geopolymer concrete. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2020;508(1):012124.10.1088/1755-1315/508/1/012124 ↗
5. Gou M, Zhou L, Then N. Utilization of tailings in cement and concrete: A review. Sci Eng Compos Mater. 2019;26(1):449–64.10.1515/secm-2019-0029 ↗
6. Le V, Szczypinski M, Hájková P, Kovacic V, Bakalova T, Volesky L, et al. Mechanical properties of geopolymer foam at high temperature. Sci Eng Compos Mater. 2020;27(1):129–38.10.1515/secm-2020-0013 ↗
7. Luhar S, Luhar I. Valorisation of waste glasses for the development of geopolymer mortar—Properties and applications: An appraisal. J Compos Sci. 2022;6:30.10.3390/jcs6010030 ↗
8. Mohajerani A, Suter D, Jeffrey-Bailey T, Song T, Arulrajah A, Horpibulsuk S, et al. Recycling waste materials in geopolymer concrete. Clean Techn Env Policy. 2019;21:493–515.10.1007/s10098-018-01660-2 ↗
9. Podolsky Z, Liu J, Dinh H, Doh JH, Guerrieri M, Fragomeni S. State of the art on the application of waste materials in geopolymer concrete. Case Stud Constr Mater. 2021;15:e00637.10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00637 ↗
10. Mohd Mortar NA, Abdullah MMAB, Abdul Razak R, Abd Rahim SZ, Aziz IH, Nabiałek M, et al. Geopolymer ceramic application: A review on mix design, properties and reinforcement enhancement. Materials. 2022;15:7567.10.3390/ma15217567 ↗
11. Zhong H, Zhang M. Engineered geopolymer composites: A state-of-the-art review. Cem Concr Compos. 2023;135:104850.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104850 ↗
12. Davidovits J. Geopolymers. J Therm Anal. 1991;37:1633–56.10.1007/BF01912193 ↗
13. Cong P, Cheng Y. Advances in geopolymer materials: A comprehensive Review. J Traffic Transport Eng (Engl Ed). 2021;8:283–314.10.1016/j.jtte.2021.03.004 ↗
14. Sitaram Amritphale S, Bhardwaj P, Gupta R. Advanced Geopolymerization Technology. In: Alshaaer M, Jeon H-Y, editors. Geopolymers and other geosynthetics. London, UK: IntechOpen; 2020. ISBN 978-1-78985-176-2.10.5772/intechopen.87250 ↗
15. Duxson P, Fernández-Jiménez A, Provis JL, Lukey GC, Palomo A, van Deventer JSJ. Geopolymer technology: The current state of the art. J Mater Sci. 2007;42:2917–33.10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z ↗
16. Tchakoute HK, Elimbi A, Yanne E, Djangang CN. Utilization of volcanic ashes for the production of geopolymers cured at ambient temperature. Cem Concr Compos. 2013;38:75–81.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.03.010 ↗
17. Lemougna PN, MacKenzie KJD, Melo UFC. Synthesis and thermal properties of inorganic polymers (geopolymers) for structural and refractory applications from volcanic ash. Ceram Int. 2011;37:3011–8.10.1016/j.ceramint.2011.05.002 ↗
18. Zhuang XY, Chen L, Komarneni S, Zhou CH, Tong DS, Yang HM, et al. Fly ash-based geopolymer: Clean production, properties and applications. J Clean Prod. 2016;125:253–67.10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.019 ↗
19. Olivia M, Nikraz H. Properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete designed by Taguchi method. Mater Des. 2012;36:191–8.10.1016/j.matdes.2011.10.036 ↗
20. Golewski GL, Szostak B. Strength and microstructure of composites with cement matrixes modified by fly ash and active seeds of C-S-H phase. Struct Eng Mech. 2022;82(4):543–56.
21. Golewski GL. Combined effect of coal fly ash (CFA) and nanosilica (nS) on the strength parameters and microstructural properties of eco-friendly concrete. Energies. 2023;16(1):452.10.3390/en16010452 ↗
22. Golewski GL. Fracture performance of cementitious composites based on quaternary blended cements. Materials. 2022;15(17):6023.10.3390/ma15176023 ↗
23. Golewski GL. An extensive investigations on fracture parameters of concretes based on quaternary binders (QBC) by means of the DIC technique. Constr Build Mater. 2022;351:128823.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128823 ↗
24. Golewski GL. Comparative measurements of fracture toughness combined with visual analysis of cracks propagation using the DIC technique of concretes based on cement matrix with a highly diversified composition. Theor Appl Fract Mech. 2022;121:103553.10.1016/j.tafmec.2022.103553 ↗
25. Zhang P, Han S, Golewski GL, Wang X. Nanoparticle-reinforced building materials with applications in civil engineering. Adv Mech Eng. 2014;12:10.10.1177/1687814020965438 ↗
26. Yankwa Djobo JN, Elimbi A, Tchakouté HK, Kumar S. Mechanical activation of volcanic ash for geopolymer synthesis: Effect on reaction kinetics, gel characteristics, physical and mechanical properties. RSC Adv. 2016;6:39106–17.10.1039/C6RA03667H ↗
27. Belfiore CM, Amato C, Pezzino A, Viccaro M. An end of waste alternative for volcanic ash: A resource in the manufacture of ceramic tiles. Constr Build Mater. 2020;263:120118.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120118 ↗
28. Alqarni AS. A comprehensive review on properties of sustainable concrete using volcanic pumice powder ash as a supplementary cementitious material. Constr Build Mater. 2022;323:126533.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126533 ↗
29. Contrafatto L. Recycled etna volcanic ash for cement, mortar and concrete manufacturing. Constr Build Mater. 2017;151:704–13.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.125 ↗
30. Smithsonian Institution; Venzke, E. Volcanoes of the World, v. 4.3.4 2013.
31. Finocchiaro C. Evaluation of new uses of volcanic ashes and paleo-soils coming from Mt. Etna volcano in the geopolymer production. Plinius. 2021;47:26–30. (01004).
32. Finocchiaro C, Barone G, Mazzoleni P, Leonelli C, Gharzouni A, Rossignol S. FT-IR study of early stages of alkali activated materials based on pyroclastic deposits (Mt. Etna, Sicily, Italy) using two different alkaline solutions. Constr Build Mater. 2020;262:120095.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120095 ↗
33. Karolina R, Tarigan J, Megat JMA, Mijarsh MJA, Hardjasaputra H. Synthesis of volcanic ash-based geopolymer mortar designed by the Taguchi method. Civ Eng. 2022;8:2585–97.10.28991/CEJ-2022-08-11-016 ↗
34. Tchakoute KH, Mbey JA, Elimbi A, Kenne DBB, Njopwouo D. Synthesis of volcanic ash-based geopolymer mortars by fusion method: Effects of adding metakaolin to fused volcanic ash. Ceram Int. 2013;39:1613–21.10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.08.003 ↗
35. Djobo YJN, Elimbi A, Tchakouté KH, Kumar S. Mechanical properties and durability of volcanic ash based geopolymer mortars. Constr Build Mater. 2016;124:606–14.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.141 ↗
36. Khan A. Microstructure investigation of fly ash f and fly ash c geopolymer concrete using synergy of recycle aggregates. JMCMS. 2020;15(9):344–54.10.26782/jmcms.2020.09.00027 ↗
37. Klima KM, Schollbach K, Brouwers HJH, Yu Q. Thermal and fire resistance of class F fly ash based geopolymers – A review. Constr Build Mater. 2022;323:126529.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126529 ↗
38. Sgarlata C, Formia A, Ferrari F, Leonelli C. Effect of the introduction of reactive fillers and metakaolin in waste clay-based materials for geopolymerization processes. Molecules. 2021;26:1325.10.3390/molecules26051325 ↗
39. D’Angelo A, Dal Poggetto G, Piccolella S, Leonelli C, Catauro M. Characterisation of white metakaolin-based geopolymers doped with synthetic organic dyes. Polymers. 2022;14:3380.10.3390/polym14163380 ↗
40. Vyazovkin S, Chrissafis K, Di Lorenzo ML, Koga N, Pijolat M, Roduit B, et al. ICTAC kinetics committee recommendations for collecting experimental thermal analysis data for kinetic computations. Thermochim Acta. 2014;590:1–23.10.1016/j.tca.2014.05.036 ↗
41. Abate L, Badea E, Blanco I, Della Gatta G. Heat capacities and enthalpies of solid−solid transitions and fusion of a series of eleven primary alkylamides by differential scanning calorimetry. J Chem Eng Data. 2008;53:959–65.10.1021/je700662a ↗
42. Hudzicki J. Kirby-bauer disk diffusion susceptibility test protocol. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 2009.
43. Dal Poggetto G, D’Angelo A, Catauro M, Barbieri L, Leonelli C. Recycling of waste corundum abrasive powder in MK-based geopolymers. Polymers. 2022;14:2173.10.3390/polym14112173 ↗
44. Simão L, Fernandes E, Hotza D, Ribeiro MJ, Montedo ORK, Raupp-Pereira F. Controlling efflorescence in geopolymers: A new approach. Case Stud Constr Mater. 2021;15:e00740.10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00740 ↗
45. Liang K, Cui K, Sabri MMS, Huang J. Influence factors in the wide application of alkali-activated materials: A critical review about efflorescence. Materials. 2022;15:6436.10.3390/ma15186436 ↗
46. Barone G, Finocchiaro C, Lancellotti I, Leonelli C, Mazzoleni P, Sgarlata C, et al. Potentiality of the use of pyroclastic volcanic residues in the production of alkali activated material. Waste Biomass Valor. 2021;12:1075–94.10.1007/s12649-020-01004-6 ↗
47. Dal Poggetto G, Catauro M, Crescente G, Leonelli C. Efficient addition of waste glass in MK-based geopolymers: Microstructure, antibacterial and cytotoxicity investigation. Polymers. 2021;13:1493.10.3390/polym13091493 ↗
48. Diaz EI, Allouche EN, Eklund S. Factors affecting the suitability of fly ash as source material for geopolymers. Fuel. 2010;89:992–6.10.1016/j.fuel.2009.09.012 ↗
49. Lamanna G, Soprano A, Bollino F, Catauro M. Mechanical characterization of hybrid (organic-inorganic) geopolymers. KEM. 2013;569–570:119–25.10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.569-570.119 ↗
50. Sitarz M, Handke M, Mozgawa W. Identification of silicooxygen rings in SiO2 based on IR spectra. Spectrochim Acta Part A. 2000;56:1819–23.10.1016/S1386-1425(00)00241-9 ↗
51. Djobo JNY, Tchadjié LN, Tchakoute HK, Kenne BBD, Elimbi A, Njopwouo D. Synthesis of geopolymer composites from a mixture of volcanic scoria and metakaolin. J Asian Ceram Soc. 2014;2:387–98.10.1016/j.jascer.2014.08.003 ↗
52. Catauro M, Dal Poggetto G, Sgarlata C, Vecchio Ciprioti S, Pacifico S, Leonelli C. Thermal and microbiological performance of metakaolin-based geopolymers cement with waste glass. Appl Clay Sci. 2020;197:105763.10.1016/j.clay.2020.105763 ↗
53. Nickolov ZhS, Ozcan O, Miller JD. FTIR analysis of water structure and its significance in the flotation of sodium carbonate and sodium bicarbonate salts. Colloids Surf A. 2003;224:231–9.10.1016/S0927-7757(03)00317-0 ↗
54. Vimonsatit S, Chindaprasirt P, Ruangsiriyakul S, Sata V. Influence of fly ash fineness on water requirement and shrinkage of blended cement mortars. KKU Eng J. 2015;42(4):311–6.
55. Azam A, Ahmed AS, Oves M, Khan MS, Habib SS, Memic A. Antimicrobial activity of metal oxide nanoparticles against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria: a comparative study. Int J Nanomed. 2012;7:6003–9.10.2147/IJN.S35347 ↗
56. Shahbazi E, Morshedzadeh F, Zaeifi D. Bacteriostatic potency of Fe2O3 against enterococcus faecalis in synergy with antibiotics by DDST method. Avicenna J Med Biotechnol. 2019;11(2):176–9.
57. Tan J, Wang D, Cao H, Qiao Y, Zhu H, Liu X. Effect of local alkaline microenvironment on the behaviors of bacteria and osteogenic cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(49):42018–29.10.1021/acsami.8b15724 ↗