Analysis of the bending and failure of fiber metal laminates based on glass and carbon fibers
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The purpose of this paper is to investigate the mechanisms of cracking and failure in fiber metal laminates (FMLs) subjected to 3-point bending. Two types of laminates, based on the glass/epoxy and carbon/epoxy composites, were selected for the study. The paper presents the failures of matrix and fibers as well as the effects of different thicknesses of metal layers on the tested laminates. The mechanisms of failure observed for the two tested types of fibers with uniform thickness of aluminum sheets seem similar. The results demonstrate that the tested laminates exhibit the following failure modes: fiber breakage, matrix cracking, fiber/matrix debonding, delamination, and anodic layer failure. Given the behavior of aluminum under the compressive and tensile stresses, the aluminum layer acts as a barrier preventing FML failure during bending. In addition to aluminum layer thickness, the fiber type and composite layer directions are also important factors to be considered.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Smart Materials for Construction · Fatigue and fracture mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Engineering , Lublin University of Technology , Nadbystrzycka 36 , 20-618 Lublin , Poland
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Vlot A. GLARE® History of the Development of a New Aircraft Material, Kluwer Academic Publishers: Delft, The Netherlands, 2001.
2. Khalili SMR, Mittal RK, Kaliba GS. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2005, 412, 1–2, 137–140.10.1016/j.msea.2005.08.01610.1016/j.msea.2005.08.016 ↗
3. Yeh JR. Eng. Fract. Mech. 1988, 30, 827–837.10.1016/0013-7944(88)90144-010.1016/0013-7944(88)90144-0 ↗
4. Marissen R. Adv. Fatigue Sci. Technol. 1989, 159, 697–703.10.1007/978-94-009-2277-8_31 ↗
5. Afaghi-Khatibi A, Lawcock G, Ye L, Mai YW. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2000, 185, 2–4, 173–190.10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00258-310.1016/S0045-7825(99)00258-3 ↗
6. Bazhenov SL. Composites 1995, 26, 11, 757–765.10.1016/0010-4361(95)98196-R10.1016/0010-4361(95)98196-R ↗
7. Greenhalgh ES. Failure Analysis and Fractography of Polymer Composites, Woodhead Publishing Limited and CRC Press LLC: USA, 2009.10.1201/9781439847510 ↗
8. Czapski P, Kubiak T. Fibres Text East Eur.http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/12303666.1161764.10.5604/12303666.1161764 ↗
9. Jones RM. Mech. Compos. Mater.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00611782.10.1007/BF00611782 ↗
10. Jones RM. J. Compos. Mater. 1976, 10, 342–354.10.1177/00219983760100040710.1177/002199837601000407 ↗
11. Mujika F, Carbajal N, Arrese A, Mondragón I. Polymer Test 2006, 25, 766–771.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.05.00310.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.05.003 ↗
12. Carbajal N, Mujika F. Polym Test 2009, 28, 150–156.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2008.11.00310.1016/j.polymertesting.2008.11.003 ↗
13. Wu G, Yang JM. Failure Structural Materials. doi: 10.1007/s11837-005-0067-4.10.1007/s11837-005-0067-4 ↗
14. Pahr DH, Rammerstorfer FG, Rosenkranz P, Humer K, Weber HW. Composites Part B 2002, 33, 125–132.10.1016/S1359-8368(01)00063-4 ↗
15. Remmers JJ, De Borst R. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2001, 61, 2207–2213.10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00114-210.1016/S0266-3538(01)00114-2 ↗
16. Liu Ch, Du D, Li H, Hu Y, Xu Y, Tian Y, Tao G, Tao J. Composites Part B 2016, 97, 15, 361–367.10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.05.003 ↗
17. Hu YB, Li HG, Cai L, Zhu JP, Pan L, Xua J, Tao J. Composites Part B 2015, 69, 587–591.10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.11.01110.1016/j.compositesb.2014.11.011 ↗
18. Cepeda-Jimenez CM, Alderliesten RC, Ruano OA, Carreno F. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2009, 69, 3–4, 343–348.10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.10.01010.1016/j.compscitech.2008.10.010 ↗
19. Carrillo JG, Cantwell WJ. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2007, 67, 1684–1693.10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.06.01810.1016/j.compscitech.2006.06.018 ↗
20. Kamocka M, Zglinicki M, Mania RJ. Composites Part B 2016, 91, 135–143.10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.01.01410.1016/j.compositesb.2016.01.014 ↗
21. Carrillo JG, Cantwell WJ. Mech. Mater. 2009, 41, 828–838.10.1016/j.mechmat.2009.03.00210.1016/j.mechmat.2009.03.002 ↗
22. Cepeda-Jiméneza CM, Pozuelob M, García-Infantaa JM, Ruanoa OA, Carren˜o F. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2008, 496,1–2, 133–142.10.1016/j.msea.2008.05.01510.1016/j.msea.2008.05.015 ↗
23. Mortell DJ, Tanner DA, McCarthy CT. Compos. Struct. 2016, 149, 33–40.10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.03.05410.1016/j.compstruct.2016.03.054 ↗
24. Bieniaś J, Jakubczak P, Surowska B, Dragan K. Arch. Civil Mech. Eng. 2015, 15, 4, 925–932.10.1016/j.acme.2014.09.00710.1016/j.acme.2014.09.007 ↗
25. Bieniaś J, Jakubczak P, Dadej K. Compos. Struct. 2016, 152, 3399–3348.10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.056 ↗
26. Abrate S. Impact on Composite Structures, Cambridge University Press: New York, 1998, pp 135–160.10.1017/CBO9780511574504 ↗
27. González EV, Maimí P, Camanho PP, Lopes C, Blanco N. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2011, 71, 805–817.10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.12.01810.1016/j.compscitech.2010.12.018 ↗
28. Turner P, Liu T, Zeng X. Compos. Struct. 2016, 142, 286–297.10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.01.10010.1016/j.compstruct.2016.01.100 ↗
29. Khashaba U, Seif M. Compos Struct 2006, 74, 440–448.10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.04.02410.1016/j.compstruct.2005.04.024 ↗
30. UNE-EN ISO 14130:1999: Fibre-reinforced plastic plastic composites. Determination of apparent interlaminar shear strength by short beam method, 1999.
31. Racz ZS, Vas LM. Compos. Interfaces 2005, 12, 325–339.10.1163/156855405397155110.1163/1568554053971551 ↗
32. Fleck NA, Liu D. Eur. J. Mech. A 2001, 20, 23–37.10.1016/S0997-7538(00)01124-410.1016/S0997-7538(00)01124-4 ↗
33. Ostapiuk M, Surowska B, Bieniaś J, Majerski K. Compos. Theory Pract. 2013, 13, 237–240.
34. Wisnom MR, Atkinson JA. Compos. Struct. 1997, 38, 405–412.10.1016/S0263-8223(97)00075-510.1016/S0263-8223(97)00075-5 ↗
35. Whitney JM, Knight M. Exp. Mech. 1980, 17, 211–216.10.1002/j.2161-1920.1980.tb00719.x ↗
36. Jackson KE, Kellas S, Morton J. J. Compos. Mater. 1992, 26, 2674–2705.10.1177/00219983920260180310.1177/002199839202601803 ↗