Damage Detection in Carbon Fiber Reinforced Composites Using Acoustic Emission Technology and the ECAG-ResNet Network
Source abstract
Abstract
Carbon fiber reinforced composites are susceptible to multiple types of damage during service in practical engineering applications, with complex interactions often occurring among different damage mechanisms. Reliable identification and characterization of these damage types are essential for ensuring the structural integrity and safe operation of composite components. In this study, acoustic emission (AE) techniques and deep learning methods are employed to classify damage modes in carbon fiber reinforced composites. A novel model, termed the efficient channel attention gated residual network (ECAG-ResNet), is developed by integrating gated convolutional layers and the efficient channel attention (ECA) mechanism into a residual network framework. The proposed model’s performance is systematically compared against five conventional baseline models. The raw acoustic emission signals are first processed using continuous wavelet transform (CWT), followed by data augmentation to enhance the model’s generalization capability during training. The wavelet-transformed and augmented data are then used as inputs to the neural network. The results indicate that the ECAG-ResNet model achieved a damage recognition accuracy of 93%, significantly outperforming traditional neural networks and effectively mitigating overfitting. This presents a novel approach for utilizing acoustic emission techniques in damage identification of composite materials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Smart Materials for Construction · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Gholizadeh, S., Leman, Z., and Baharudin, B.T.H.T., State-of-the-art ensemble learning and unsupervised learning in fatigue crack recognition of glass fiber reinforced polyester composite (GFRP) using acoustic emission, Ultrasonics, 2023, vol. 132, p. 106998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2023.10699810.1016/j.ultras.2023.106998 ↗
2. Xu, B., Wu, J., and Wang, M., Study of modal acoustic emission to monitor the impact damage in a composite plate, J. Vibroeng., 2017, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 3335–3348. https://doi.org/10.21595/jve.2017.1787910.21595/jve.2017.17879 ↗
3. Shen, G., Shen, Y., and Yuan, Y., Study of the acoustic emission characteristics of weld cracks in carbon steel pressure vessels, Insight, 2022, vol. 64, no. 9, pp. 496–502. https://doi.org/10.1784/insi.2022.64.9.49610.1784/insi.2022.64.9.496 ↗
4. Chelliah, S.K., Kannivel, S.K., and Vellayaraj, A., Characterization of failure mechanism in glass, carbon and their hybrid composite laminates in epoxy resin by acoustic emission monitoring, Nondestr. Test. Eval., 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/10589759.2019.159082910.1080/10589759.2019.1590829 ↗
5. Chelliah, S.K., Parameswaran, P., Ramasamy, S., Vellayaraj, A., and Subramanian, S., Optimization of acoustic emission parameters to discriminate failure modes in glass-epoxy composite laminates using pattern recognition, Struct. Health Monit., 2019, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1253–1267. https://doi.org/10.1177/147592171879132110.1177/1475921718791321 ↗
6. Morokov, E., Levin, V., Ryzhova, T., Dubovikov, E., Petronyuk, Y., and Gulevsky, I., Bending damage evolution from micro to macro level in CFRP laminates studied by high-frequency acoustic microscopy and acoustic emission, Compos. Struct., 2022, vol. 288, p. 115427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11542710.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115427 ↗
7. Stepanova, L.N., Laznenko, A.S., Petrova, E.S., Kazakova, A.V., Ramazanov, I.S., and Chernova, V.V., Acoustic-Emission and Strain-Gauging Control of Defects in Static Tests of Composite Aircraft Landing Gear Spring, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2025, vol. 61, no. 7, pp. 725–736. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106183092570017210.1134/S1061830925700172 ↗
8. Matvienko, Y.G., Vasiliev, I.E., and Fursov, V.Y., Application of acoustic emission and vibration diagnostics methods in compression testing of composite specimens, Defektoskopiya, 2025, no. 5, pp. 17–28. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013030822505002410.31857/S0130308225050024 ↗
9. Abraham, D.M., Joselin, R., and Jabha, D.J., Predicting Failure in Carbon/Epoxy Specimens with Nol Ring Test and Acoustic EMISSION Analysis, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2025, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 547–556. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106183092460352010.1134/S1061830924603520 ↗
10. Makhutov, N.A., Vasiliev, I.E., Chernov, D.V., Ivanov, V.I., and Terent’ev, E.V., Kinetics of damage accumulation and failure in the zones of stress raisers in sample rupture tests, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2021, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1134/s106183092101009510.1134/s1061830921010095 ↗
11. Qiao, S., Huang, M., Liang, Y., et al., Damage mode identification in carbon/epoxy composite via machine learning and acoustic emission, Polym. Compos., 2023, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 2427–2440. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2725410.1002/pc.27254 ↗
12. Saeedifar, M., Saleh, M.N., De Freitas, S.T., et al., Damage characterization of adhesively-bonded bimaterial joints using acoustic emission, Composites, Part B, 2019, vol. 176, p. 107356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10735610.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107356 ↗
13. Stepanova, L.N., Kabanov, S.I., and Chernova, V.V., Locating acoustic emission signals due to shock impacts on a carbon fiber sample using piezoelectric and fiber optic sensors, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2022, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 237–247. https://doi.org/10.1134/s106183092204009x10.1134/s106183092204009x ↗
14. Han, W., Zhou, J., Gu, A., Hu, K., and Wang, Y., Delamination Initiation Identification of Mode II Based on AE Characterization of Composite Damage Mechanism, J. Nondestr. Eval., 2024, vol. 43, no. 2, p. 60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-024-01083-810.1007/s10921-024-01083-8 ↗
15. Makhutov, N.A., Vasil’ev, I.E., Chernov, D.V., Ivanov, V.I., and Terent’ev, E.V., Adaptation of methodology for monitoring damage kinetics and assessing load-bearing capacity in relation to steel products, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2022, vol. 58, no. 9, pp. 800–813. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106183092209007810.1134/S1061830922090078 ↗
16. Abraham, D.M., Jabha, D.J., and Joselin, R., A novel approach utilizing acoustic emission technique is proposed for predicting the burst pressure of GFRP pressure bottles, Polym. Compos., 2025, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 4482–4490. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2925310.1002/pc.29253 ↗
17. Matvienko, Y.G., Vasil’ev, I.E., Balandin, T.D., and Chernov, D.V., Features of Constructing Planar Localization of Acoustic Emission Sources Using Inglada’s Triangulation Algorithm, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2024, vol. 60, no. 12, pp. 1325–1334.10.1134/S1061830924602599 ↗
18. Almeida, R.S.M., Magalhães, M.D., Karim, M.N., et al., Identifying damage mechanisms of composites by acoustic emission and supervised machine learning, Mater. Des., 2023, vol. 227, pp. 111745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2023.11174510.1016/j.matdes.2023.111745 ↗
19. Claudia, B., Caterina, C., Giovanni, P., et al., Damage monitoring of carbon fibre reinforced polymer composites using acoustic emission technique and deep learning, Compos. Struct., 2022, vol. 292, no. 4, p. 115629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11562910.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115629 ↗
20. Frik, M., Benkedjouh, T., Essaidi, A.B., and Boumediene, F., Advancing damage assessment of CFRP-composite through BILSTM and Hilbert Upper Envelope Analysis, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2023, vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 1241–1258. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106183092360082X10.1134/S106183092360082X ↗
21. Zhang, Y., Xue, S., Chen, C., Ma, T., and Zhou, B., Study on acoustic emission characteristics and damage mechanism of wind turbine blade main spar with different defects, Polymers, 2024, vol. 16, no. 23, p. 3261. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1623326110.3390/polym16233261 ↗
22. Zhou, W., Zhang, Y.N., and Zhao, W.Z., Evaluation of progressive damage and identification of failure mechanisms in carbon fiber woven composites via tensile test, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2020, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106183092003013410.1134/S1061830920030134 ↗
23. Ai, L., Mesaric, T., Flowers, S., Houck, S., Widawsky, J., and Ziehl, P., Evaluation of impact energy in composites using acoustic emission sensing technique, Meas. Sci. Technol., 2024, vol. 36, no. 1, p. 0161a4. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ad9d6a10.1088/1361-6501/ad9d6a ↗
24. Xue, S.N., Wang, J., Liang, Y.Z., Ma, L.H., and Zhou, W., Indentation damage identification of carbon fiber composite laminates based on modal acoustic emission and machine learning, Polym. Compos., 2025, vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 6944–6955. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2940510.1002/pc.29405 ↗
25. Yinghonglin, L., Peng, J., Wei, L., Chang, Y., Ping, S., and Xiaowei, Y., Predicting the delamination mechanisms of multidirectional laminates using the energy release rate obtained from AE monitoring, Mater. Eval., 2022, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 34–47. https://doi.org/10.32548/2022.me-0425410.32548/2022.me-04254 ↗
26. Guo, F., Li, W., Jiang, P., Chen, F., and Yang, C., Deep learning for time series-based (incomplete).
27. Gutkin, R., Green, C.J., Vangrattanachai, S., Pinho, S.T., Robinson, P., and Curtis, P.T., On acoustic emission for failure investigation in CFRP: Pattern recognition and peak frequency analyses, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 2011, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 1393–1407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.11.01410.1016/j.ymssp.2010.11.014 ↗