Fusing Multiscale Nonlocal Total Variation and Adaptive Bilateral Filtering for Iterative Reconstruction in Sparse-View CT
Source abstract
Abstract
Sparse-view computed tomography (CT) iterative reconstruction suffers from severe image quality degradation, including reduced resolution and pronounced artifacts, due to insufficient projection data. As a result, it fails to meet the requirements for high-fidelity imaging in industrial and medical applications. To address this issue, this paper proposes a sparse-view CT iterative reconstruction algorithm that integrates multiscale nonlocal total variation and adaptive bilateral filtering (MA-SART). The proposed method extends the simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique (SART) by incorporating a combined regularization strategy based on multiscale nonlocal total variation (MNLTV) and adaptive bilateral filtering (ABF) within the iterative reconstruction loop. This synergistic framework aims to achieve a globally optimal reconstruction while preserving fine details and effectively suppressing artifacts and noise. Specifically, the MNLTV term captures nonlocal similarities across multiple scales, thereby reducing gradient-related artifacts at the global structural level. In addition, the proposed ABF dynamically adjusts its spatial and intensity standard deviations and employs a gradient consistency constraint to modulate the range kernel weights, which suppresses artifacts near strong edges while preserving edge structures. The performance of MA-SART was validated using the Shepp–Logan phantom and wood transverse section datasets. Qualitative results show that images reconstructed using MA-SART closely resemble the reference images, particularly in regions with complex textures under magnification. For quantitative evaluation, the root mean square error (RMSE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), and structural similarity index measure (SSIM) were used to compare MA-SART with ART, SART, SART-GSRRGF, and POCS-TVM. The experimental results demonstrate that MA-SART produces reconstructions that are closer to the original images and outperform the comparison methods in preserving fine structural details.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications · Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging · Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Parcero, E., Flores, L., Sánchez, M.G., Vidal, V., and Verdú, G., Impact of view reduction in CT on radiation dose for patients, Radiat. Phys. Chem., 2017, vol. 137, pp. 173–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.04.00810.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.04.008 ↗
2. Ahmed, A., Verma, N., Barreto, L., and Mohammed, T.L., Low-dose lung cancer screening at an academic medical center: initial experience and dose reduction strategies, Acad. Radiol., 2018, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 1025–1030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2017.12.01710.1016/j.acra.2017.12.017 ↗
3. Lell, M. and Kachelrieß, M., Recent and upcoming technological developments in computed tomography: high speed, low dose, deep learning, multi energy, Invest. Radiol., 2020, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.000000000000060110.1097/RLI.0000000000000601 ↗
4. Zhao, K., Ge, Z., Huo, L., Gao, Y., Zhou, Y., and Yao, Z., Application Progress and Prospect of Defect Detection Technology for Timber Structure Members, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2024, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 455–469. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106183092360131910.1134/S1061830923601319 ↗
5. Gordon, R., Bender, R., and Herman, G.T., Algebraic Reconstruction Techniques (ART) for three-dimensional electron microscopy and X-ray photography, J. Theor. Biol., 1970, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 471–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(70)90109-810.1016/0022-5193(70)90109-8 ↗
6. Andersen, A.H. and Kak, A.C., Simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique (SART): a superior implementation of the ART algorithm, Ultrason. Imaging, 1984, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0161-7346(84)90008-710.1016/0161-7346(84)90008-7 ↗
7. Barber, R., Sidky, E., and Schmidt, T., An algorithm for constrained one-step inversion of spectral CT data, Phys. Med. Biol., 2016, vol. 61, no. 10, pp. 3784–3818. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/61/10/378410.1088/0031-9155/61/10/3784 ↗
8. Graff, C.G. and Sidky, E., Compressive sensing in medical imaging, Appl. Opt., 2015, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.54.000C2310.1364/AO.54.000C23 ↗
9. Chen, Y., Ye, X., and Feng, H., A novel method and fast algorithm for MR image reconstruction with significantly under-sampled data, Inverse Probl. Imaging, 2017, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 223–240. https://doi.org/10.3934/ipi.2010.4.22310.3934/ipi.2010.4.223 ↗
10. Candes, E.J., Romberg, J., and Tao, T., Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 2006, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 489–509. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2005.86208310.1109/TIT.2005.862083 ↗
11. Sidky, E. and Pan, X., Image reconstruction in circular cone-beam computed tomography by constrained, total-variation minimization, Phys. Med. Biol., 2008, vol. 53, no. 17, pp. 4777–4807. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/53/17/02110.1088/0031-9155/53/17/021 ↗
12. Sidky, E., Emil, Y., and Kao, C., Accurate image reconstruction from few-views and limited-angle data in divergent-beam CT, J. X-Ray Sci. Technol., 2006, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 119–139.
13. Ban, X., Li, Z., and Li, B., Sparse image reconstruction based on improved total generalized variation, Laser Optoelectron. Prog., 2018, vol. 55, no. 11, p. 111103. https://doi.org/10.3788/LOP55.11110310.3788/LOP55.111103 ↗
14. Qu, Z., Zhao, X., and Pan, J., Sparse-view CT reconstruction based on gradient directional total variation, Meas. Sci. Technol., 2019, vol. 30, no. 5, p. 055404. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ab0b9d10.1088/1361-6501/ab0b9d ↗
15. Zhang, J. and Qiao, Z., Computed tomography reconstruction algorithm based on relative total variation minimization, CT Theory Appl., 2023, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 153–169.
16. Jin, X., Li, L., and Chen, Z., Anisotropic total variation for limited-angle CT reconstruction, in: IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC), 2010, pp. 2232–2238. https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.2010.587424510.1109/NSSMIC.2010.5874245 ↗
17. Zhao, K., Ge, Z., Liu, G., Gao, Y., Gao, Z., and Ni, Y., Research on Correction Method for Fan-Shaped Beam Digital Radiography Imaging with Linear Array Detectors, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2024, vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 1062–1071. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106183092460217410.1134/S1061830924602174 ↗
18. Zhang, Q., Shen, X., Xu, L., and Jia, J., Rolling guidance filter, Computer Vision–-ECCV 2014. ECCV 2014. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., vol. 8691, Springer, 2014, pp. 815–830. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10578-9_5310.1007/978-3-319-10578-9_53 ↗
19. Aurich, V. and Weule, J., Non-linear gaussian filters performing edge preserving diffusion, Proc. DAGM Symp. (London, 1995), pp. 538–545.10.1007/978-3-642-79980-8_63 ↗
20. Tomasi, C. and Manduchi, R., Bilateral filtering for gray and color images, Proc. 6th Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. (ICCV) (1998), pp. 839–846. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.1998.71081510.1109/ICCV.1998.710815 ↗
21. Qian, X., Guo, L., and Yu, B., Scale-based adaptive smoothing, 2010 2nd Int. Conf. Future Comput. Commun. (FCC) (Wuhan, 2010), pp. 240–244. https://doi.org/10.1109/FCC.2010.2610.1109/FCC.2010.26 ↗
22. Lin, C., Tsai, J., and Chiu, C., Switching Bilateral filter with a texture/noise detector for universal noise removal, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 2010, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 2307–2320. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2010.204790710.1109/TIP.2010.2047907 ↗