Identification and Detection of Debonding at Steel Plate-Concrete Interface Based on Reference-Free Lamb Wave
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Cracks, spalling, cavities and other damages occur in the process of long-term service of concrete, so that the bearing capacity of the building decreases, which needs to be reinforced by the adhesive steel plate reinforcement method. However, debonding phenomenon can occur at the interface between steel plate and concrete, which affects the overall stiffness and load carrying capacity of the structure, so debonding detection at the steel-concrete interface is particularly important. In this paper, a reference-free Lamb wave-based identification detection method for steel plate-concrete debonding is proposed, in which the Hilbert energy spectrum is used as a damage factor. The method does not require a preset reference signal, which is obtained by comparing the debonding signals. Firstly, the simulation is carried out by finite element software, the circular sensor array is arranged on the surface of the steel plate, and each sensor acts as excitation and reception, the Hilbert energy spectrum of the signal is obtained, the damage coefficient is calculated, the probabilistic imaging algorithm is utilized to realize the localization of the debonding position and the imaging, and finally the simulation is verified by experiments. The results show the feasibility of the method in debonding identification detection.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Microwave Imaging and Scattering Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Onaizi, A.M., Amran, M., Tang, W., et al., Radiation-shielding concrete: A review of materials, performance, and the impact of radiation on concrete properties, J. Build. Eng., 2024, p. 110800.10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110800 ↗
2. Yin, Y., Ren, Q., Lei, S., et al., Mesoscopic crack pattern fractal dimension-based concrete damage identification, Eng. Fract. Mech., 2024, vol. 296, p. 109829.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109829 ↗
3. Li, B., Chen, Z., Wang, S., et al., A review on the damage behavior and constitutive model of fiber reinforced concrete at ambient temperature, Constr. Build. Mater., 2024, vol. 412, p. 134919.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.134919 ↗
4. Zhang, J., Peng, L., Wen, S., et al., A Review on concrete structural properties and damage evolution monitoring techniques, Sensors, 2024, vol. 24, no. 2, p. 620.10.3390/s24020620 ↗
5. Xie, M., Hoa, S.V., and Xiao, X.R., Bonding steel reinforced concrete with composites, J. Reinf. Plast. Compos., 1995, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 949–964.10.1177/073168449501400903 ↗
6. Abdallah, S., Fan, M., and Rees, D.W.A., Bonding mechanisms and strength of steel fiber–reinforced cementitious composites: Overview, J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 2018, vol. 30, no. 3, p. 04018001.10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002154 ↗
7. Kucharska, M. and Jaskowska-Lemanska, J., Properties of a bond between the steel reinforcement and the new generation concretes–a review, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., 2019, vol. 603, no. 4, p. 042057.10.1088/1757-899X/603/4/042057 ↗
8. Fedin, K.V. and Marilov, O.K., Detection of hidden defects in composite material using the standing waves method, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2024, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 368–377.10.1134/S1061830924601752 ↗
9. Minghui, W., Hongjun, C., Aihua, D., et al., A new method for wellhead device defect identification with ultrasonic signals, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2023, vol. 59, no. 9, pp. 964–976.10.1134/S1061830923600429 ↗
10. Vasil’ev, A.V., Biryukov, D.Y., and Zatsepin, A.F., Ultrasonic testing of butt joints in electric steel plates using Lamb waves, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2023, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 11–21.10.1134/S1061830923700171 ↗
11. Luo, K., Chen, L., and Liang, W., Numerical simulation of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composite delamination damage identification using Lamb wave and filtered back-projection method, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2022, vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 917–925.10.1134/S1061830922700024 ↗
12. Wu, C., Wei, Q., Zhu, Y., et al., Fatigue microcracks detection and assessment in high-strength marine steel using nonlinear ultrasonic waves: experimental and numerical investigation, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2024, vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 726–739.10.1134/S1061830924601648 ↗
13. Jiang, Y., Han, L., Wang, R., et al., Quantitative detection of internal flaws of action rod based on ultrasonic technology, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2023, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 171–181.10.1134/S1061830922601039 ↗
14. Moravvej, M. and El-Badry, M., Reference-free vibration-based damage identification techniques for bridge structural health monitoring–a critical review and perspective, Sensors, 2024, vol. 24, no. 3, p. 876.10.3390/s24030876 ↗
15. Alem, B., Abedian, A., and Nasrollahi-Nasab, K., Reference-free damage identification in plate-like structures using lamb-wave propagation with embedded piezoelectric sensors, J. Aerosp. Eng., 2016, vol. 29, no. 6, p. 04016062.10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000646 ↗
16. Zhang, L., Cheng, X., Wu, G., et al., Reference-free damage identification method for highway continuous girder bridges based on long-gauge fibre Bragg grating strain sensors, Measurement, 2022, vol. 195, p. 111064.10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111064 ↗
17. Chen, H., Ren, Y., Gan, S., et al., Interfacial debonding detection for steel-concrete composite structures part I: Benchmark test and signal calibration of contact and non-contact measurement, Structures, 2024, vol. 62, p. 106123.10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106123 ↗
18. Guo, C., Xu, C., Xiao, D., et al., Ultrasonic resonance evaluation method for deep interfacial debonding defects of multilayer adhesive bonded materials, Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci., 2024, vol. 63, no. 1, p. 20230172.10.1515/rams-2023-0172 ↗
19. Bu, C.W., Zhao, B., Liu, T., et al., Infrared thermal imaging detection of debonding defects in carbon fiber reinforced polymer based on pulsed thermal wave excitation, Therm. Sci., 2020, vol. 24, no. 6, part B, pp. 3887–3892.10.2298/TSCI2006887B ↗
20. Li, Y., Liu, X., Chen, G., et al., Study on interfacial debonding stress and damage mechanisms of C/SiC composites using acoustic emission, Ceram. Int., 2021, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 4512–4520.10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.10.013 ↗
21. Lai, G.D., Sang, L.P., Bian, Y.L., et al., Interfacial debonding and cracking in a solid propellant composite under uniaxial tension: An in situ synchrotron X-ray tomography study, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2024, p. 110743.10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110743 ↗
22. Alleyne, D.N. and Cawley, P., The interaction of Lamb waves with defects, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, 1992, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 381–397.10.1109/58.143172 ↗
23. Croxford, A.J., Wilcox, P.D., Drinkwater, B.W., and Konstantinidis, G., Strategies for guided-wave structural health monitoring, Proc. R. Soc. A, 2007, vol. 463, no. 2087, pp. 2961–2981.10.1098/rspa.2007.0048 ↗
24. Michaels, J.E., Lee, S.J., and Michaels, T.E., Enhanced differential methods for guided wave phased array imaging, J. Nondestr. Eval., 2011, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 20–30.10.1007/s10921-010-0086-0 ↗
25. Li, L., Wang, F., Shang, F., et al., Energy spectrum analysis of blast waves based on an improved Hilbert–Huang transform, Shock Waves, 2017, vol. 27, pp. 487–494.10.1007/s00193-016-0667-7 ↗
26. Olhede, S. and Walden, A.T., The Hilbert spectrum via wavelet projections, Proc. R. Soc. A, 2004, vol. 460, no. 2044, pp. 955–975.10.1098/rspa.2003.1199 ↗
27. Su, Z., Ye, L., Su, Z., et al., Fundamentals and analysis of lamb waves, in Identification of Damage Using Lamb Waves: From Fundamentals to Applications, 2009, pp. 15–58.10.1007/978-1-84882-784-4 ↗
28. Tian, Z. and Yu, L., Lamb wave frequency–wavenumber analysis and decomposition, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 2014, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1107–1123.10.1177/1045389X14521875 ↗
29. Alleyne, D.N. and Cawley, P., Optimization of Lamb wave inspection techniques, NDT & E Int., 1992, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 11–22.10.1016/0963-8695(92)90003-Y ↗
30. Kessler, S.S., Spearing, S.M., and Soutis, C., Damage detection in composite materials using Lamb wave methods, Smart Mater. Struct., 2002, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 269–278.10.1088/0964-1726/11/2/310 ↗
31. Yeum, C.M., Sohn, H., Lim, H.J., et al., Reference-free delamination detection using Lamb waves, Struct. Control Health Monit., 2014, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 675–684.
32. Chen, S., Wang, M., and Wang, Y., Feature extraction of pulse diagnosis signal based on Hilbert yellow transform, Proc. SPIE, 2021, vol. 11900, pp. 138–146.
33. Cheng, J., Yu, D., Tang, J., et al., Application of frequency family separation method based upon EMD and local Hilbert energy spectrum method to gear fault diagnosis, Mech. Mach. Theory, 2008, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 712–723.10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2007.05.007 ↗
34. Zhao, X., Royer, R.L., Owens, S.E., et al., Ultrasonic Lamb wave tomography in structural health monitoring, Smart Mater. Struct., 2011, vol. 20, no. 10, p. 105002.10.1088/0964-1726/20/10/105002 ↗
35. Leonard, K.R., Malyarenko, E.V., and Hinders, M.K., Ultrasonic Lamb wave tomography, Inverse Probl., 2002, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1795–1808.10.1088/0266-5611/18/6/322 ↗
36. Zhang, W., Su, C., Zhang, Y., et al., Locating and imaging composite damage based on frequency spectrum detection of lamb waves, Front. Phys., 2022, vol. 10, p. 1073206.10.3389/fphy.2022.1073206 ↗