journal article·2025-07

Electronic Paramagnetic Resonance and Thermoluminescence of Polytetrafluoroethylene for Control of Radiation Technologies

E. N. Vazirova, M. Yu. Artyomov, I. I. Mil’man, A. I. Surdo, R. M. Abashev

Publisher page

Abstract

The possibility of implementing the high-dose dosimetry method based on a combination of electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) and thermally stimulated luminescence (TL) phenomena was investigated. Domestically produced polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) was used as an ionizing radiation detector. Detector samples were irradiated with accelerated electrons with an energy of 10 MeV with doses from 10 to 50 kGy. After irradiation, the intensities of the EPR and TL signals were measured from each detector. The dependence of the EPR signal intensity on the radiation dose was linear. The TL parameters were equal to: maximum temperature $${{T}_{{\text{m}}}} = 164~^\circ {\text{C}}$$ , form factor $${{\mu }g} = 0.45$$ , frequency factor $$S = 4.44 \times {{10}^{{11}}}\;{{{\text{s}}}^{{ - 1}}}$$ , activation energy $$E = 1.14$$ eV. The spectral composition of TL had a wide band with a luminescence maximum of approximately 425 nm. The dose dependence of the TL output was also linear in the studied dose range. Annealing of EPR and TL signals occurred in the same temperature range, 160–240°C. The correlation of dose dependences of normalized intensities of EPR and TL signals, the similarity of their temperature ranges of annealing intensities, indicated that the EPR and TL properties of PTFE detectors are associated with changes in the charge states of the same centers.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials · Radiation Effects and Dosimetry · Polymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (13)

Show source-provided references
1. Stepanenko, V.F., Biryukov, V.A., Kaprin, A.D., Galkin, V.N., Ivanov, S.A., Kariakin, O.B., Mardinskiy, Yu.S., Gulidov, I.A., Kolyzhenkov, T.V., Ivannikov, A.I., Borysheva, N.B., Skvortsov, V.G., Akhmedova, U.A., Bogacheva, V.V., Petukhov, A.D., Yaskova, E.K., Khailov, A.M., Lepilina, O.G., Sanin, D.B., Korotkov, V.A., Obukhov, A.A., and Anokhin, Yu.N., Intracavitary offline “in vivo” dosimetry for high dose-rate prostate brachytherapy with Ir-192: Development of technology and first results of its application, Radiat. Risk, 2017, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 72–82. https://doi.org/10.21870/0131-3878-2017-26-2-72-8210.21870/0131-3878-2017-26-2-72-82 ↗
2. Kortov, V.S., Mil’man, I.I., Monakhov, A.V., and Slesarev, A.I., Combined TSL-ESR MgO detectors for ionizing and UV radiations, Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 1993, vol. 47, no. 1–4, pp. 273–276. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a08174910.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a081749 ↗
3. Kortov, V.S., Mil’man, I.I., Slesarev, A.I., and Kijko, V.S., New BeO ceramics for TL-ESR dosimetry, Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 1993, vol. 47, no. 1–4, pp. 267–270. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a08174710.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a081747 ↗
4. Yukihara, E.G., Bos, A.J.J., Bilski, P., and McKeever, S.W.S., The quest for new thermoluminescence and optically stimulated luminescence materials: Needs, strategies and pitfalls, Radiat. Meas., 2022, vol. 158, no. 106846, pp. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2022.10684610.1016/j.radmeas.2022.106846 ↗
5. D’Amorim, R.A.P.O., Teixeira, M.I., Caldas, L.V.E., and Souza, S.O., Physical, morphological and dosimetric characterization of the Teflon agglutinator to thermoluminescent dosimetry, J. Lumin., 2013, vol. 136, pp. 186–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2012.11.04510.1016/j.jlumin.2012.11.045 ↗
6. Mil’man, I.I., Surdo, A.I., Abashev, R.M., Tsmokalyuk, A.N., Berdenev, N.E., Agdantseva, E.N., and Popova, M.A., Polytetrafluoroethylene in high-dose EPR dosimetry for monitoring radiation technologies, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2019, vol. 55, pp. 868–874. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106183091911007X10.1134/S106183091911007X ↗
7. Rokeakh, A.I. and Artyomov, M.Yu., Continuous wave desktop coherent superheterodyne X-band EPR spectrometer, J. Magn. Reson., 2022, vol. 338, no. 107206, pp. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2022.10720610.1016/j.jmr.2022.107206 ↗
8. Pagonis V., Kitis G., Furetta C. Numerical and Practical Exercises in Thermoluminescence, New York: Springer, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-30090-210.1007/0-387-30090-2 ↗
9. Karakirova, Y., Application of amino acids for high-dosage measurements with electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy, Molecules, 2023, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2804174510.3390/molecules28041745 ↗
10. Theory of Thermoluminescence and Related Phenomena, Singapore: World Scientific, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1142/278110.1142/2781 ↗
11. Yukihara, E.G., McKeever, S.W.S., Andersen, C.E., Bos, A.J.J., Bailiff, I.K., Yoshimura, E.M., Sawakuchi, G.O., Bossin, L., and Christensen, J.B., Luminescence dosimetry, Nat. Rev. Methods Primers, 2022, vol. 2, no. 26, pp. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-022-00102-010.1038/s43586-022-00102-0 ↗
12. Demol, G., Paulmier, T., and Payan, D., Characterization of charge traps properties in space used fluoropolymers through thermo-stimulated electrical methods, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., 2023, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 2530–2537. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2023.325530010.1109/TPS.2023.3255300 ↗
13. Vazirova, E.N., Mil’man, I.I., Surdo, A.I., and Abashev, R.M., RF Patent no. 2816340, 2024.