Particle Distribution Measurement of Highly Concentrated Emulsions Based on Ultrasonic Extended Coupled Phase Model
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This paper introduces a method for measuring solute particle size in solution. The working principle of this method is to characterize the particle size by using the ultrasonic extended coupled phase model combined with the acoustic attenuation coefficient of the solution. In the ultrasonic detection of highly concentrated emulsion particles, the inter-particle interaction, namely the structural loss, becomes the main factor affecting the ultrasonic attenuation. In this study, micron-sized emulsions with 10, 15, and 20% concentration were experimentally detected by the extended coupled-phase model, and the inverse calculation of the particle size distribution was carried out using a differential evolutionary algorithm. The detection results showed an average error of 4.266% compared with those of laser particle sizer. The results show that ultrasonic detection based on the extended coupled phase model combined with differential evolution inversion algorithm can achieve accurate measurement of particle size distribution of emulsions with high concentration.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions · Surfactants and Colloidal Systems · Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Efeoglu, E. and Tuna, G., Detection of hazardous liquids using microwave data and well-known classification algorithms, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2020, vol. 56, p. 742. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106183092009003X10.1134/S106183092009003X ↗
2. Mil’man, I.I., Surdo, A.I., Abashev, R.M., Tsmokalyuk, A.N., Berdenev, N.E., Agdantseva, E.N., and Popova, M.A., Polytetrafluorethylene in high-dose EPR dosimetry for monitoring radiation technologies, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2019, vol. 55, p. 868. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106183091911007X10.1134/S106183091911007X ↗
3. Su, M.X., Cai, X.S., Xue, M.H., Dong, L.L., and Xu, F., Particle sizing in dense two-phase droplet systems by ultrasonic attenuation and velocity spectra, Sci. Chin. Ser. E-Technol. Sci., 2009, vol. 52, p. 1502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-009-0172-710.1007/s11431-009-0172-7 ↗
4. Figueiredo, M., Alvarenga, A., and Costa-Félix, R., Ultrasonic attenuation and sound velocity assessment for mixtures of gasoline and organic compounds, Fuel, 2017, vol. 191, p. 170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.11.07610.1016/j.fuel.2016.11.076 ↗
5. Zhang, S., Zhang, Q., Shang, J., Mao, Z., and Yang, C., Measurement methods of particle size distribution in emulsion polymerization, Chin. J. Chem. Eng., 2021, vol. 39, p. 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2021.03.00710.1016/j.cjche.2021.03.007 ↗
6. Su, Q., Tan, C., and Dong, F., Mechanism modeling for phase fraction measurement with ultrasound attenuation in oil–water two-phase flow, Meas. Sci. Technol., 2017, vol. 28, no. 3, p. 035304. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/aa58dc10.1088/1361-6501/aa58dc ↗
7. Weser, R., Wöckel, S., Wessely, B., and Hempel, U., Ultrasonics, 2013, vol. 53, no. 3, p. 706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2012.10.01310.1016/j.ultras.2012.10.013 ↗
8. Khairi, M., Ibrahim, S., Yunus, M., and Faramarzi, M., Contact and non-contact ultrasonic measurement in the food industry: a review, Meas. Sci. Technol., 2015, vol. 27(1), p. 012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/27/1/01200110.1088/0957-0233/27/1/012001 ↗
9. Mondal, S. and Datta, D., An ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation of contents of silica powder and carbon black in nitrile rubbers, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2022, vol. 58, p. 971. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106183092260055110.1134/S1061830922600551 ↗
10. Al-Lashi, R. and Challis, R., Ultrasonic particle sizing in aqueous suspensions of solid particles of unknown density, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 2015, vol. 138, p. 1023. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.492769410.1121/1.4927694 ↗
11. Yu, H., Tan, C., and Dong, F., Measurement of oil fraction in oil-water dispersed flow with swept-frequency ultrasound attenuation method, Int. J Multiphase Flow, 2020, vol. 133, p. 103444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2020.10344410.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2020.103444 ↗
12. Dukhin, A. and Goetz, P., Acoustic and electroacoustic spectroscopy for characterizing concentrated dispersions and emulsions, Adv. Colloid Interface, 2001, vol. 92, nos. 1–3, p. 73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8686(00)00035-X10.1016/S0001-8686(00)00035-X ↗
13. Song, W., Carlo, C., and Chi-Hung, C., Multifractional Brownian motion and quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization for short term power load forecasting: An integrated approach, Energy, 2020, vol. 194(C). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.11684710.1016/j.energy.2019.116847 ↗
14. Karaboga, N., A new design method based on artificial bee colony algorithm for digital IIR filters, J. Franklin Inst., 2009, vol. 346, no. 4, p. 328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2008.11.00310.1016/j.jfranklin.2008.11.003 ↗
15. Ferri, F., Bassini, A., and Paganini, E., Modified version of the Chahine algorithm to invert spectral extinction data for particle sizing, Appl Opt., 1995, vol. 34, no. 25, p. 5829. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.34.00582910.1364/AO.34.005829 ↗
16. Liu, X., Shen, J., Thomas, J., Clementi, L., and Sun, X., Multiangle dynamic light scattering analysis using a modified Chahine method, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 2012, vol. 113, no. 6, p. 489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2011.12.01210.1016/j.jqsrt.2011.12.012 ↗
17. Carstensen, C. and Praetorius, D., Averaging techniques for the effective numerical solution of Symm’s integral equation of the first kind, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 2006, vol. 27, no. 4, p. 1226. https://doi.org/10.1137/04060903310.1137/040609033 ↗
18. Soltanali, S., Halladj, R., Tayyebi, S., and Rashidi, A., Mater. Lett., 2014, vol. 136, p. 138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2014.08.03910.1016/j.matlet.2014.08.039 ↗
19. Clementi, L., Vega, J., and Gugliotta, L., Particle size distribution of multimodal polymer dispersions by multiangle dynamic light scattering. solution of the inverse problem on the basis of a genetic algorithm, Part. Part. Syst. Char., 2010, vol. 27, nos. 5–6, p. 146. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppsc.20100001110.1002/ppsc.201000011 ↗
20. Mohamad, N., Ariffin, M., Ali, A., Mustapha, F., and Salleh, I., Development of genetic algorithm toolbox using MATLAB in cutting tool path optimization, Sci. Res. Essays, 2013, vol. 8(38), p. 1848. https://doi.org/10.5897/SRE10.55010.5897/SRE10.550 ↗
21. Yuan, Q., Sun, R., and Du, X., Path planning of mobile robots based on an improved particle swarm optimization algorithm, Processes, 2023, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr1101002610.3390/pr11010026 ↗
22. Piotrowski, A., Napiorkowski, J., and Piotrowska, A., Particle swarm optimization or differential evolution—A comparison, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intel., 2023, vol. 121, p. 106008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.10600810.1016/j.engappai.2023.106008 ↗
23. Yi, W., Lin, Z., Chen, Y., Pei, Z., and Lu, J., An enhanced adaptive differential evolution approach for constrained optimization problems, CMES-Compr. Model Eng., 2023, vol. 136, no. 3, p. 2841. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2023.02705510.32604/cmes.2023.027055 ↗