Insight into the Interfacial Evolutions between Halide and Sulfide Solid Electrolytes
Source abstract
Abstract
Halide solid-state electrolytes (HSEs) exhibit electrochemical instability with the Li metal anode, which necessitates the adaptation of an interlayer, mostly sulfide solid-state electrolytes (SSEs). So far, the HSE/SSE compatibility has been overlooked, and their interfacial reactions remain undiscovered. Here, we comprehensively unveil HSE/SSE interfacial evolutions using Li 3 InCl 6 (LIC) and Li 6 PS 5 Cl (LPSC) under two typical operating scenarios: static aging and electrochemical aging. We not only visualize the LIC/LPSC interfacial evolutions but also quantify their interfacial reaction determinants, products, and corresponding mechanisms. Our findings reveal that LIC/LPSC interfaces are unstable under all circumstances. Under static aging, the interfacial reactions are diffusion-controlled, and the main reaction products (In 2 S 3 and InP) lead to successive diffusion and deteriorated structure. Under electrochemical aging, the interfacial reactions are both diffusion-controlled and charge-transfer-controlled, and the increased reaction product InCl 3 leads to suppressed diffusion and a preserved structure.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Thermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity · Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Materials Science and Engineering
Southeast University
Funding
Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41586-023-05899-810.1038/s41586-023-05899-8 ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20230154010.1002/adma.202301540 ↗
3. 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2022.016810.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2022.0168 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.cclet.2025.11109610.1016/j.cclet.2025.111096 ↗
5. 10.1002/cssc.20250004410.1002/cssc.202500044 ↗
6. 10.1007/s40820-025-01691-710.1007/s40820-025-01691-7 ↗
7. 10.1002/adfm.20240506010.1002/adfm.202405060 ↗
8. 10.1002/smll.20240027210.1002/smll.202400272 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41467-024-55154-510.1038/s41467-024-55154-5 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsenergylett.4c0278810.1021/acsenergylett.4c02788 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41467-024-45258-310.1038/s41467-024-45258-3 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41467-024-45864-110.1038/s41467-024-45864-1 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsenergylett.4c0147210.1021/acsenergylett.4c01472 ↗
14. 10.1002/anie.20201523810.1002/anie.202015238 ↗
15. 10.1007/s40843-020-1580-310.1007/s40843-020-1580-3 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.4c0230710.1021/acs.chemmater.4c02307 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.1c0014210.1021/acsmaterialslett.1c00142 ↗
18. 10.1039/D2EE00803C10.1039/D2EE00803C ↗
19. 10.1002/anie.20190980510.1002/anie.201909805 ↗
20. 10.1039/C9EE02311A10.1039/C9EE02311A ↗
21. 10.1002/adma.20231035610.1002/adma.202310356 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0166810.1021/acsenergylett.2c01668 ↗
23. 10.1002/aenm.20220367310.1002/aenm.202203673 ↗
24. 10.1002/aenm.20210074810.1002/aenm.202100748 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsenergylett.4c0108410.1021/acsenergylett.4c01084 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.11039110.1016/j.cclet.2024.110391 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.08.11510.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.08.115 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41467-022-34855-910.1038/s41467-022-34855-9 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.09.09710.1016/j.electacta.2015.09.097 ↗
30. 10.1126/sciadv.abi552010.1126/sciadv.abi5520 ↗
31. 10.1039/D3EE00420A10.1039/D3EE00420A ↗
32. 10.1149/2.030207jes10.1149/2.030207jes ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.07.00610.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.07.006 ↗
34. 10.1002/aenm.20230133810.1002/aenm.202301338 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsami.9b2262910.1021/acsami.9b22629 ↗
36. Briggs D. · Phys. Unserer Zeit · 1977 · 10 · 30
37. 10.1002/sia.74015110210.1002/sia.740151102 ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c0380010.1021/acs.chemmater.1c03800 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ensm.2023.10307210.1016/j.ensm.2023.103072 ↗